| 10 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1692 | 回復(fù): 9 | ||
[求助]
Waste Management編輯回復(fù),大牛來(lái)看看,這是為啥??????????? 已有1人參與
|
|
The above referenced manuscript was recently submitted to Waste Management with a view to publication and was sent for peer review. Based on the comments and recommendations received from the reviewers and on my review of your manuscript, I regret to inform you that we are not in a position to accept your manuscript for publication in Waste Management in its current form. However, I feel that the paper contains information of potential interest to readers of Waste Management. Therefore, I wish to invite you to address all points raised by reviewers, taking all time you may deem necessary, and to resubmit a new version of the paper to the journal via the EES system. It should be underlined that the paper would not be considered as a revised version but as a new manuscript, and would once again be forwarded to the peer-review process. I am sorry our decision could not be more positive, but I look forward to receiving a re-submitted version of the paper. Kind Regards Ian D. Williams Associate Editor Waste Management 三個(gè)評(píng)審都是小修,而且表示了濃厚的興趣,為啥還給拒稿了,并且竟然還邀請(qǐng)按照評(píng)審意見(jiàn)修改后重新投稿!這是啥意思啊?麻煩大牛來(lái)看看,給點(diǎn)意見(jiàn)! |

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
木蟲 (著名寫手)


銅蟲 (正式寫手)
|
樓主,你好。我也遇到你waste management 當(dāng)年一樣的問(wèn)題,我不知道該怎么辦了,想問(wèn)一下你當(dāng)年的文章最后是怎么樣的。是改完后又重新投到了這個(gè)雜志,然后被送外審再走一遍流程?還是直接就錄用了。 The above referenced manuscript was recently submitted to Waste Management with a view to publication and was sent for peer review. Based on the comments and recommendations received from the reviewers and on my review of your manuscript, I regret to inform you that we are not in a position to accept your manuscript for publication in Waste Management in its current form. However, I feel that the paper contains information of potential interest to readers of Waste Management. Therefore, I wish to invite you to submit a new manuscript on this topic. If you elect to submit a new manuscript, then should must (1) list the original manuscript in the cover letter, (2) include a point by point response to the reviewer's comments, and (3) submit the revised manuscript within 6 months of the date of this letter. It should be that the paper will not be considered as a revised version but as a new manuscript, and would once again be forwarded to the peer-review process. I am sorry our decision could not be more positive, but I look forward to receiving a re-submitted version of the paper. Kind Regards Ph.D. Editor-in-Chief Waste Management |

銅蟲 (正式寫手)
| 10 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|