| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1226 | 回復: 8 | ||
| 本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個 翻譯EPI ,點擊這里進行查看 | ||
喲喲william木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[求助]
小段英文翻譯,求助。各路大神速來呀。!
|
|
|
To understand the reason for the superior electrochemical performance of the sulfur–carbon composite synthesized by the in situ sulfur-deposition route, EIS measurements were carried out with the coin cells. The Nyquist profiles of the pure sulfur and sulfur–carbon composite cathodes and the equivalent circuits are shown in Fig. 8. Re refers to the resistance of electrolyte, Rct refers to the charge transfer resistance between the interfaces of carbon/ sulfur/electrolyte, Wo refers to the Warburg impedance, and CPE refers to the constant phase element [23]. The resistance of electrolyte was estimated from the intersection of the front end of semicircles with the Z axis, which is similar for both the cathodes. The diameter of the impedance semicircles is related to the charge transfer resistance, which is a measure of the difficulty involved for charges crossing the boundary between the electrode and electrolyte. Before cycling, the sulfur–carbon composite cathode has a slightly lower charge transfer resistance value than the pure sulfur cathode, which is expected considering its higher first discharge capacity compared to that of the pure sulfur cathode. The close contact between the conductive carbon black and the insulating sulfur lowers the resistance for electrons transferring across the interface between them. In the subsequent cycles (1st, 25th, and 50th), the charge-transfer resistance of the pure sulfur cathode grows much larger than that found with the sulfur–carbon composite cathode. The main reason for this is the porous structure of the cycled pure sulfur cathode. Electrons passing across the boundary between conductive carbon and active material are impeded by the irreversible formation of the Li2S layer in the pores [10]. The EIS measurements thus reveal that the sulfur–carbon composite cathode exhibits better electronic conductivity and lithium-ion transport than the pure sulfur cathode due to the stable network structure of carbon black wrapping around the sulfur. The impedance of the sulfur–carbon composite after 50th cycles does not increase much, suggesting that the network structure maintains its integrity during the cycling process. |

木蟲 (著名寫手)

木蟲 (小有名氣)

木蟲 (著名寫手)

木蟲 (小有名氣)

木蟲 (著名寫手)

木蟲 (小有名氣)
| 為了更好的理解通過原位硫沉積法制備的硫-碳復合物電極具有良好電化學性能的原因,我們使用扣式電池進行了電化學阻抗譜的測試。圖8中所表示的是純的硫,硫碳復合物電極,以及對應電路的尼奎斯特圖像。其中,Re代表電池液的電阻,Rct代表碳/硫/電池液界面間電荷轉(zhuǎn)移的阻力,Wo代表瓦爾堡阻抗,CPE代表常相角元件。電池液以及陰極的電阻通過圖線中半圓形曲線的前端與Z軸的交點確定。阻抗曲線的直徑與電荷轉(zhuǎn)移的阻力相關,通過該值可以測定電荷穿越電極和電池液界面的難易。在循環(huán)前,硫碳復合物電極的電荷傳遞阻力值略小于單純硫電極,考慮到它與單純硫電極相比較高的首次放電能力,這一點是可以理解的。導電炭黑與絕緣體硫的緊密接觸減小了兩者界面上電子傳遞的阻力。在后面的循環(huán)中(第一次,第25次,第50 次),單純硫電極的電荷傳遞阻力增大程度要遠大于硫碳復合物電極。單純硫電極的多孔結構導致了這一現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn)。電子在穿過導體碳和活性材料之間的界面時,被孔中不可逆生成的Li2S層阻礙。電化學阻抗譜的測試結果顯示,硫碳復合物電極中,炭黑包裹在硫的表面生成穩(wěn)定的網(wǎng)絡結構,使其與單純硫電極相比具有更好的電子傳導性能以及鋰離子傳輸性能。硫碳電極在50次循環(huán)后,阻抗并沒有明顯的增加,顯示了其網(wǎng)絡結構在循環(huán)過程中保持了很好的完整性。 |
木蟲 (小有名氣)

木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
To understand the reason for the superior electrochemical performance of the sulfur–carbon composite synthesized by the in situ sulfur-deposition route, EIS measurements were carried out with the coin cells. 通過對紐扣電池進行電化學阻抗分析,來了解原位硫沉積法合成的碳硫復合物為什么具有良好的電化學特性。 The Nyquist profiles of the pure sulfur and sulfur–carbon composite cathodes and the equivalent circuits are shown in Fig. 8. 純硫陰極電極和碳硫復合陰極電極的 Nyquist剖面和等效電路如圖8所示。 Re refers to the resistance of electrolyte, Rct refers to the charge transfer resistance between the interfaces of carbon/ sulfur/electrolyte, Wo refers to the Warburg impedance, and CPE refers to the constant phase element [23]. 其中,Re代表電解液的電阻,Rct代表碳/硫/電解液界面間電荷轉(zhuǎn)移電阻,Wo代表瓦爾堡阻抗,CPE代表常相位角元件。 The resistance of electrolyte was estimated from the intersection of the front end ofsemicircles with the Z axis, which is similar for both the cathodes.與陰極電阻計算方法相似,電解液的電阻通過圖線中半圓形曲線的前端與Z軸的交點確定。 The diameter of the impedance semicircles is related to the charge transfer resistance, which is a measure of the difficulty involved for charges crossing the boundary between the electrode and electrolyte.阻抗曲線的直徑與電荷轉(zhuǎn)移電阻有關,通過該值可以斷定電荷穿越電極和電池液界面的難易程度。 Before cycling, the sulfur–carbon composite cathode has a slightly lower charge transfer resistance value than the pure sulfur cathode, which is expected considering its higher first discharge capacity compared to that of the pure sulfur cathode. 循環(huán)前,硫碳復合電極的電荷轉(zhuǎn)移阻力值略小于純硫電極,這是由于碳硫復合電極的首次放電容量比純硫電極高。 The close contact between the conductive carbon black and the insulating sulfurlowers the resistance for electrons transferring across the interface between them. 導電炭黑與絕緣硫的緊密接觸減小了兩者界面間電子轉(zhuǎn)移電阻。 In the subsequent cycles (1st, 25th, and 50th), the charge-transfer resistance of the pure sulfur cathode grows much larger than that found with the sulfur–carbon composite cathode.在隨后的循環(huán)中(第1圈,第25圈,第50 圈),純硫電極電荷轉(zhuǎn)移電阻的增加程度要遠大于碳硫復合物電極。 The main reason for this is the porous structure of the cycled pure sulfur cathode. 循環(huán)純硫電極的多孔結構導致了這一現(xiàn)象的出現(xiàn)。 Electrons passing across the boundary between conductive carbon and active material are impeded by the irreversible formation of the Li2S layer in the pores [10]. 在孔內(nèi)單向生產(chǎn)的硫化鋰層阻礙了電子在導電碳和活性材料之間的轉(zhuǎn)移。 The EIS measurements thus reveal that the sulfur–carbon composite cathode exhibits better electronic conductivity and lithium-ion transport than the puresulfur cathode due to the stable network structure of carbon black wrapping around the sulfur. 電化學阻抗譜的測試結果顯示,由于碳硫復合電極具有碳包裹硫的穩(wěn)定網(wǎng)狀結構,它的電子導電性以及鋰離子的轉(zhuǎn)移要比純硫電極好。 The impedance of the sulfur–carbon composite after 50th cycles does not increase much, suggesting that the network structure maintains its integrity during the cycling process. 在50圈循環(huán)后,碳硫復合電極的阻抗并沒有明顯增加,說明在循環(huán)過程中網(wǎng)狀結構保持完整。 參考…… |

| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 華東師范大學-071000生物學-293分-求調(diào)劑 +3 | 研究生何瑤明 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 280求調(diào)劑 +7 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調(diào)劑 +4 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 【考研調(diào)劑】化學專業(yè) 281分,一志愿四川大學,誠心求調(diào)劑 +8 | 吃吃吃才有意義 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 354求調(diào)劑 +5 | Tyoumou 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調(diào)劑 +4 | shxchem 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +5 | 冬十三 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 324求調(diào)劑 +5 | lucky呀呀呀鴨 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +7 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ^O^乜 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | eation27 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調(diào)劑 +10 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-15 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | 為學666 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學 305求調(diào)劑 +4 | FY_yy 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學 生命科學與健康學院-課題組招收2026級食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] [導師推薦]西南科技大學國防/材料導師推薦 +3 | 尖角小荷 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 東南大學364求調(diào)劑 +5 | JasonYuiui 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 機械專碩325,尋找調(diào)劑院校 +3 | y9999 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0856專碩279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 加油加油!? 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|