 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2915 | 回復(fù): 34 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
huomingying銀蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[求助]
求鑒定是大修還是小修，還有中的可能！
|
|
|
小弟我之前中了幾篇國內(nèi)的EI，這是小弟第一次嘗試投SCI。去年10月初投的，一直審到今年3月。第一個(gè)評審專家就是讓加一段解釋，兩個(gè)簡單的語法修改，基本算小修吧。第二個(gè)專家很認(rèn)真，把我將近40個(gè)公式從頭到尾推了一邊，其中我確實(shí)有一些敲寫錯(cuò)誤都給我指出了；還把我參考文獻(xiàn)下載看了一下，說參考文獻(xiàn)應(yīng)該是“original source of a work”，有兩個(gè)參考文獻(xiàn)寫錯(cuò)了；另外也讓我在文中加一些解釋；修改意見寫了很多很詳細(xì)，但是基本是以上3類，沒有對研究問題、方法和結(jié)果提出異議。大家說說這樣是大修還是小修呢？這次還需要評審那么長時(shí)間么？我本想要中一篇SCI，這學(xué)期博士開題能夠順利點(diǎn)，不知道計(jì)劃能不能達(dá)成。以下是修改意見（確實(shí)有點(diǎn)多）： Reviewer #1: 5. Numerical Simulations; It would be better if you can explain the physical meanings of the optimization result more. The optimized state/control histories in Fig.7 is very interesting. Readers would like to question why these histories are physically optimal. For example the orbital radius first increases from 1 to 1.05 for about 50 days then decreases to 0.8. Why wouldn't it monotonically decrease from 1 to 0.8? For other example, the zenithal angle first decreases slowly but after 150th day, it rapidly decreases to 80 deg. Why wouldn't it keep the same change rate? Although these histories are NLP result, the physical meaning of these behaviors are not trivial. For the completeness of this paper, I recommend that you add explanation for them. Abstract: the solutions of general mode and geostationary mode <of> electric sail 1. Introduction 1st paragraph: analysis the stability -> analyzed the stability 2. Dynamical Equation: It would be better if the angle alpha and beta are defined(cone and clock) in this section not in the following section. Reviewer #2: The paper investigates displaced orbits using an electric sail. This is an interesting topic and some results are shown. However, there are several parts of this paper that are not clear to evaluate further, so I have the following comments for major revision. General： - This paper does not have enough fundamental explanations. Please specify the following points 1) The reason why authors selected the inertial spherical referenced frame for electric sail. 2) The reason why the transition trajectory is optimized to minimize transfer time. What does 'orbital transfer capability of electric sail' mean? - There are some typographical errors or mathematical mistakes. Please check all equations. If there exits some mathematical mistake, the results become unreliable. - References must be original source of a work. In addition please check if all cite numbers are correct. Specific: Nomenclature: -'a_+' and subscripts '+' are confusing. 1. Introduction: - p.2 line 6. '100kg propellant mass'. Is this not propellant mass but total spacecraft mass? - P.2 line 10 after Fig. 1. 'The results show that the thrust force of the solar sail decays as (1/r)^2, and that of the electric sail decays as (1/r)^(7/6)'. Mengali [12] also refer Janhunen [9]. Therefore this sentence is confusing. 2. Dynamical Equations - Eq.(2). K=cos_theta i '+' sin_theta j. Is this equation correct? If this is correct, Eq.(3) and (5) are wrong. Or K=cos_theta i '-' sin_theta j ? - Eq.(5). 'phi'sin_theta i. typographical error. 'phi_dot'sin_theta i - Eq.(9). There exists mathematical mistake. The third term about vector k, not '2(r_dot)(phi_dot)cos_theta', but '2r(phi_dot)(theta_dot)cos_theta'. Also, Eq. (13) has mistake. - p.2 line 1 before Eq. (11). Is the reference [13] correct? - Eq. (11). Please explain from what the coefficient k(kappa) is given. Is this variable value through a mission? Or specify reference about the coefficient. 3. Displaced Electric Sail Orbits - Please check the subscripts about acceleration. 'a_+' and 'a_+d' are confusing. Eq. (11) and (12) use 'a_+', but Eq. (16) use 'a_+d'. Is this 'a_+'? Is 'a_+' of Eq.(11) acceleration of the sail on Earth's orbit? On the other hand, what does 'a_+d' of Eq.(19) and (23) mean? Is this required acceleration on Earth's orbit or displaced orbit? Is this equal to magnitude of 'a_s'? 5. Numerical Simulations - p.6 line 10 after '5. Numerical Simulations'. This is not principle discussion. Therefore it cannot be mentioned that 'So that the electric sail is more competent than solar sail in the application of displaced orbit.' What does 'existing technology' mean? Acceleration of a solar sail is determined by total spacecraft mass and sail area mainly. I recommend comparison of, for example, payload mass fraction because that of electric sail is shown. - Fig. 7. History of |a_s| in Eq. (11) should be shown. |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
0703化學(xué)
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工272求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
-
一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
-
317求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
332求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
085404求調(diào)劑，總分309，本科經(jīng)歷較為豐富
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
332求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
318求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
295求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 修改意見是小修還是大修？已經(jīng)又返回去外審了，不懂！求教！
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 大修小修之后還會(huì)被拒么，有點(diǎn)怕啊
已經(jīng)有35人回復(fù)
- 審稿狀態(tài)是revise是大修還是小修？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- SCI投稿——大修之后返回小修還會(huì)不會(huì)被拒？（已被接受）
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 有三個(gè)大修，一個(gè)小修，一個(gè)據(jù)稿，但是沒有什么實(shí)質(zhì)的問題，是否argue呢？
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 投英國JMES先是大修，然后小修，最后居然是拒稿，求分析��！
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 一天大修變小修，什么情況？
已經(jīng)有28人回復(fù)
- 小修變成了大修，會(huì)不會(huì)悲劇啊
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- 兩個(gè)審稿人建議小修，主編給了大修
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- 論文修改第二次了，也沒有寫大修還是小修，都是revise，第二次修改都半個(gè)月還沒消息
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
- 編輯的意思是大修還是小修啊這是？
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
- 一年后收到初審意見沒標(biāo)明大修還是小修
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 我的第一SCI投稿返回意見了，這個(gè)算大修還是小修？ Physica A
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 這屬于大修還是小修？
已經(jīng)有37人回復(fù)
- 請看下這個(gè)是大修還是小修
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
- 小修或者大修一般多久給消息？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 文章狀態(tài)－大修還是小修？？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 幫我看看啊:編輯是要大修還是小修？
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
huomingying
銀蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 52 (初中生)
- 金幣: 399.6
- 散金: 1270
- 紅花: 9
- 帖子: 581
- 在線: 235小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 2007285
- 注冊: 2012-09-17
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 導(dǎo)航、制導(dǎo)與傳感技術(shù)
4樓2013-05-03 13:42:45
huomingying
銀蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 52 (初中生)
- 金幣: 399.6
- 散金: 1270
- 紅花: 9
- 帖子: 581
- 在線: 235小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 2007285
- 注冊: 2012-09-17
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 導(dǎo)航、制導(dǎo)與傳感技術(shù)
2樓2013-05-03 13:28:20
yoyopku
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 260 (大學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 2919.1
- 散金: 14
- 紅花: 7
- 帖子: 1299
- 在線: 175.4小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1876795
- 注冊: 2012-07-03
- 專業(yè): 國際政治學(xué)
3樓2013-05-03 13:41:06
yuxinnick
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 722 (博后)
- 金幣: 3387.1
- 散金: 1171
- 紅花: 7
- 帖子: 1111
- 在線: 666.6小時(shí)
- 蟲號: 1333642
- 注冊: 2011-06-29
- 專業(yè): 電能儲存與節(jié)電技術(shù)
5樓2013-05-03 13:44:10
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +7 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 椰椰。 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +8 | 蕉蕉123 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 394求調(diào)劑 +3 | 好事多磨靜候佳?/a> 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 一志愿廈門大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩307求調(diào)劑
+10
|
y7czhao 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300求調(diào)劑306分 +4 | 26要上岸 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +9 | lin0039 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +14 | 鵝鵝鵝額額額額?/a> 2026-03-25 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯滴的基本都 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南師大0703化學(xué) 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | Ripcord上岸 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +10 | A-哆啦Z夢 2026-03-23 | 16/800 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑 +5 | 求求讓我有書讀?/a> 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 08開頭275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拉誰不重要 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +4 | 贈(zèng)我一本書 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 335 分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拒絕冷暴力 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 26考研-291分-廈門大學(xué)（085601）-柔性電子學(xué)院材料工程專業(yè)求調(diào)劑 +3 | min3 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +3 | plum李子 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | 話梅糖111 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 上海電力大學(xué)材料防護(hù)與新材料重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室招收調(diào)劑研究生（材料、化學(xué)、電化學(xué)，環(huán)境） +4 | 我愛學(xué)電池 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +4 | 鵝鵝鵝額額額額?/a> 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|