 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2062 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
yang3kui新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
大家?guī)兔纯催@個 decision letter 還有 argue的空間嗎？
|
|
Reviewer Comments: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: R - Reject (Paper Is Not Of Sufficient Quality Or Novelty To Be Published In This Transactions) Comments: The two main claims of the authors are: (1) One can use recursions to compute the bilateral filter. (2) DCT kernels are a *better* option than raised cosines. As for (1), it is possible that the authors overlooked the fact that the recursions derived in the paper is just another way of writing the recursions in (**). It all boils down to the fact that as soon we have a constant spatial filter and a shiftable range filter, we can use recursions. The case where the spatial filter is not flat is more challenging. It was proposed in (**) that this can also be accounted for by approximating the spatial filter using shiftable kernels. This is exactly what is observed just before Section 3.2. Coming to point (2), note that it is clear from Fig. 2 that the DCT approximation has the same problem as Taylor polynomials, namely, they are not guaranteed to be monotonic and non-negative, and can oscillate. As was observed in (*) for Taylor polynomials, this can introduce artifacts in the final output, particularly close to edges. Morally speaking, the DCT kernel is just another linear combination of cosines. And so the idea of using DCT over raise cosines cannot be regarded as very original. (*) K. N. Chaudhury, D. Sage, and M. Unser, "Fast O(1) Bilateral Filtering Using Trigonometric Range Kernels," IEEE Trans. Image Process., 2011. (**) K. N. Chaudhury, "Constant-Time Filtering Using Shiftable Kernels," IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 18, 2011. Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in these transactions?: Yes 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes Explain: 1. Is the paper technically sound?: Yes why not?: 2. Is the coverage of the topic sufficiently comprehensive and balanced?: Treatment somewhat unbalanced, but not seriously so. 3. How would you describe technical depth of paper?: Appropriate for the Generally Knowledgeable Individual Working in the Field or a Related Field 4. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel 1. How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?: Could be improved 2. Are the title and abstract satisfactory?: Yes Explain: 3. Is the length of the paper appropriate? If not, recommend how the length of the paper should be amended, including a possible target length for the final manuscript.: Yes 4. Are symbols, terms, and concepts adequately defined?: Yes 5. How do you rate the English usage? : Needs improvement 6. Rate the Bibliography: Satisfactory null: 1. How would you rate the technical contents of the paper?: Fair 2. How would you rate the novelty of the paper?: Slightly Novel 3. How would you rate the "literary" presentation of the paper?: Mostly Accessible 4. How would you rate the appropriateness of this paper for publication in this IEEE Transactions?: Good Match Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: RQ - Review Again After Major Changes Comments: -The whole process if represented in a flow diagram would be better - More examples and more data is necessary - Some grammatical errors in page 1 - As you're concluding that UBF is a better approach than the previous approaches, a more detailed comparison of the complexity, run-time and various factors leading to this conclusion is necessary - More info on how the results were validated would be helpful for the readers Additional Questions: 1. Is the topic appropriate for publication in these transactions?: Perhaps 2. Is the topic important to colleagues working in the field?: Yes Explain: 1. Is the paper technically sound?: Yes why not?: 2. Is the coverage of the topic sufficiently comprehensive and balanced?: Treatment somewhat unbalanced, but not seriously so. 3. How would you describe technical depth of paper?: Appropriate for the Generally Knowledgeable Individual Working in the Field or a Related Field 4. How would you rate the technical novelty of the paper?: Somewhat Novel 1. How would you rate the overall organization of the paper?: Could be improved 2. Are the title and abstract satisfactory?: Yes Explain: 3. Is the length of the paper appropriate? If not, recommend how the length of the paper should be amended, including a possible target length for the final manuscript.: Yes 4. Are symbols, terms, and concepts adequately defined?: Not always 5. How do you rate the English usage? : Satisfactory 6. Rate the Bibliography: Satisfactory null: 1. How would you rate the technical contents of the paper?: Good 2. How would you rate the novelty of the paper?: Sufficiently Novel 3. How would you rate the "literary" presentation of the paper?: Mostly Accessible 4. How would you rate the appropriateness of this paper for publication in this IEEE Transactions?: Good Match 我覺得第一個審稿人的兩條意見，我都很難贊同，特別是第一條。我覺得他沒有理解 我的論文和**論文，以至于 從表面上看感覺一樣， 其實他們的本質(zhì)有很大的差別。 第二條 也有問題，我承認(rèn)沒有解決他說說的那兩個問題，但是至今都沒人解決。而我的算法比之前的more efficient。并能適用于更多場合。 覺得不服氣，想要 argue。但是沒經(jīng)驗，求高人賜教 第一篇 IEEE Transaction 不想被打擊。。。 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
271材料工程求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
281求調(diào)劑（0805）
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
-
304求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
材料工程專碩調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿天大材料與化工（085600）總分338
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
085700資源與環(huán)境308求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
求材料調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
294求調(diào)劑材料與化工專碩
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
一志愿華中科技大學(xué)，080502，354分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
一志愿吉林大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩321求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- PRL argue Letter 怎么遞交？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 這種情況可以argue嗎？審稿人認(rèn)為不適合發(fā)letter，應(yīng)該寫成長文章……
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 有經(jīng)驗的蟲蟲幫看看decision letter（JOTE），是否有繼續(xù)修改的必要？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒，是否申訴？
已經(jīng)有25人回復(fù)
- 頭疼，怎么argue?
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
wulishi8
專家顧問 (知名作家)
-
專家經(jīng)驗: +373 - SEPI: 5
- 應(yīng)助: 1195 (博后)
- 貴賓: 0.888
- 金幣: 28970.7
- 散金: 4204
- 紅花: 517
- 帖子: 7711
- 在線: 1702.7小時
- 蟲號: 654606
- 注冊: 2008-11-15
- 專業(yè): 凝聚態(tài)物性 II ：電子結(jié)構(gòu)
- 管轄: 論文投稿交流
2樓2013-05-04 00:05:52
goslar
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
我不再應(yīng)助!
- 應(yīng)助: 118 (高中生)
- 金幣: 3592.7
- 紅花: 6
- 帖子: 3115
- 在線: 174.5小時
- 蟲號: 1547023
- 注冊: 2011-12-22
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 免疫生物學(xué)
3樓2013-05-04 09:32:09
yang3kui
新蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 3.5
- 帖子: 7
- 在線: 9.7小時
- 蟲號: 2114214
- 注冊: 2012-11-08
- 專業(yè): 導(dǎo)航、制導(dǎo)與傳感技術(shù)
4樓2013-05-04 12:05:36
 |
5樓2013-05-04 12:06:26
杈杈
榮譽(yù)版主 (文壇精英)
Everyone is the No. one！
- 應(yīng)助: 680 (博士)
- 貴賓: 12.487
- 金幣: 73169.8
- 散金: 34501
- 紅花: 162
- 沙發(fā): 27
- 帖子: 23674
- 在線: 1844.3小時
- 蟲號: 314395
- 注冊: 2007-02-25
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 生物化學(xué)
- 管轄: 學(xué)術(shù)會議
6樓2013-05-04 13:14:47
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 yang3kui 的主題更新
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 【同濟(jì)軟件】軟件（085405）考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2026eternal 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 26調(diào)劑/材料/英一數(shù)二/總分289/已過A區(qū)線 +7 | 步川酷紫123 2026-03-13 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 298-一志愿中國農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)-求調(diào)劑 +7 | 手機(jī)用戶 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩306英一數(shù)二 +10 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-16 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 ，六級已過，有科研經(jīng)歷 +10 | 曦熙兮 2026-03-15 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 0854，計算機(jī)類招收調(diào)劑
+3
|
胡辣湯放糖 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)071000 329分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 我愛生物生物愛?/a> 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +5 | 煙火先于春 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | 為學(xué)666 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +8 | 一定有學(xué)上- 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +6 | 孔志浩 2026-03-12 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | 八旬速覽 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 東南大學(xué)364求調(diào)劑 +5 | JasonYuiui 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 諾貝爾化學(xué)獎覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 求調(diào)劑 +13 | enenenhui 2026-03-13 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 拾光任染 2026-03-15 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考博] 東華理工大學(xué)化材專業(yè)26屆碩士博士申請 +6 | zlingli 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856專碩279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 加油加油！? 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 學(xué)碩285求調(diào)劑 +13 | Wisjxn 2026-03-12 | 46/2300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +5 | 超級伊昂大王 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|