 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2483 | 回復(fù): 5 | ||
machi188新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
Optics letters 這樣的審稿意見，有必要重投嗎？還是按審稿意見修稿后投OE
|
|
Optics letters 返回審稿意見，一個(gè)小修，其余兩個(gè)貌似是給大修，編輯給拒稿，大家?guī)兔纯词切薷闹赝禣E的希望大不大？ Manuscript ID: 。。。。 Type: research article Title:。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 Author:。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 Dear Sir/Madam: A decision has been made on the above manuscript. As a co-author, I thought you'd be interested in seeing the referee comments. In view of their recommendations, I cannot accept the manuscript for publication in Optics Letters. If there are no reviewer comments below, please contact the corresponding author to view them. Sincerely, 。。。。。。。。。。。 Topical Editor, Optics Letters PS - If the below reviewer response refers to uploaded comments, you must ask the corresponding author for this information. Only he/she has access to it. --------------------------- Reviewer comments are provided here: Reviewer 1 The authors present and numerically analyze a waveguide based on hybrid surface plasmon polaritons. The structure possesses a higher mode confinement with one order of magnitude smaller normalized mode area as compared to previous designs. Fabrication tolerance is studied and a thorough comparison with previously reported HNWSPPs is presented. While the authors perform an excellent job in presenting their results, the manuscript could benefit from a couple of minor changes outlined below. 1. In paragraph 3 the permittivities of SiO2 and Si are given. It is stated that the “permittivities of SiO2 and Si are assumed to be 2.25 and 12.25.” Where does this assumption come from? It would be beneficial to include references as well as mention the wavelength at which these values hold true (the 1550nm wavelength is defined a little later in the manuscript). 2. In paragraph 4 it may sound better to say “we first investigated” instead of “we firstly investigated.” Reviewer 2 The authors reported a new hybrid plasmonic waveguide structure consisting of two high-index dielectric nanowire located on both sides of a nanowedge-patterned metal film. The normalized mode areas of the proposed structure are improved by one order of magnitude compared to a previous design without the nanowedges on metal film (Ref. 8). Some following questions are needed to be addressed. 1. I recommend the authors consider more realistic rounded tip of the nanowedge with different curvature not sharp tip with zero radius. Moreover, the numerical accuracy is significantly affected by meshing the density of elements. 2. In page 2, the propagation length increases first and then decreases as the tip angle increases from 20 to 160 degrees. The physical meaning of the transition needs to be explained. 3. The structure seems not to be simple to fabricate, the authors need to provide the fabrication processes. 4. In Fig. 3, the authors indicate that “this also shows there is a trade-off between mode confinement and propagation length”. However, Figure 3 shows that smaller refractive index of the cladding is better for both mode area and propagation length. Please correct the statement. 5. In Page 3, please explain the physical meaning of why both the propagation length and the normalized mode area increase as the misalignment distance s of the two tips. 6. For clearly seeing the labels in Figs. 2, 3, and 4, please magnify the sizes of the labels. Reviewer 3 In this paper the authors have proposed a new design of the hybrid plasmonic waveguide by introducing a wedge shape waveguide parallel to a silicon nano wire. On the positive side, I should say that by introducing the wedge shape in the structure there is one order of magnitude enhancement in the effective mode area while the imaginary part of the effective refractive index of the mode remains almost the same compared to ref [8]. This field enhancement could be useful in many ways including integrated lasers. But on the other hand there are some issues with this design which address novelty and the feasibility of fabrication: 1-The designs in ref [6] and [8] are simpler than their counter part in this work. In those references the silicon nano wire will be formed in close proximity of a silver Layer, but in the proposed design the nano wire needs to be fabricated on a sharp wedge shape which could be challenging from fabrication point of view. 2-Usually in sharp edge fabrication if fabrication is not limited with atomic planes then for most of the cases we will end up having a smooth round edge rather than a sharp one. Although in ref [7], the authors have suggested to make the edges sharper to improve the effective area but I believe they didn’t pursue it because it was not physically feasible. Also except the symmetry and the sharp edge I don’t see any differences between this work and ref [7]. Therefore I can conclude that this work sets an ideal upper limit for what has been done in ref [7] but physically one might get the results close to what has been achieved in ref [7] in best conditions. Therefore I should say that this work is an incremental version of ref [7] and does not meet the novelty requirements of a separate manuscript. 3-In ref[7] and figure 2 of this work the authors have shown that there is a maximum in propagation length of the waveguide at an angle around 100 degrees, but they haven’t explained the reason behind it, in other words what are the dominant mechanisms behind the drop in the propagation length above and below a specific angle. (What I mean is a qualitative explanation and possible analysis on the dominant effects controlling the propagation length). This might be a helpful analysis to improve the novelty of this work. 4-All over the manuscript microns have been shown with um which is less common and usually the symbols are preferred (μm). 5-Please include more points in your simulation in figure 3 in order to give a better picture of the trend and slope of the changes. With 2 points in the middle the reader can only see the tradeoff between propagation length and the effective area and it is not obvious how the slopes change. This is extremely important if the reader wants to design the structure. 6-Since metals show different behaviors at different wavelengths, therefore another option for improving the novelty of this work is to do the simulations at other wavelengths (namely in the 500-700 nm region far from 1550nm) or even do a broadband simulation to observe the behavior of the mode. Sometimes in this type of broadband analysis there are some interesting exceptional peaks. |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
材料考研調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
346求調(diào)劑[0856]
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
281求調(diào)劑（0805）
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
-
294求調(diào)劑材料與化工專碩
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
288求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
328求調(diào)劑，英語六級(jí)551，有科研經(jīng)歷
已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
-
一志愿西安交通大學(xué)材料工程專業(yè) 282分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
085601材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
321求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
一志愿中海洋材料工程專碩330分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 這樣的審稿意見，我是修改再投還是換雜志呢？請(qǐng)大家評(píng)評(píng)
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 責(zé)任編輯給了這樣的審稿意見回信，還有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 這樣的審稿意見如何回復(fù)
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- Optics Letter 返回審稿意見，請(qǐng)大家支招，如何處理？多謝！
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 重新投稿文章需不需要把上次審稿人的意見以及對(duì)應(yīng)的修改上傳？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 文章審稿意見---審稿人是讓我作修改還是夸我做得好呢？？
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
- Optics Letters返回兩個(gè)審稿意見，一個(gè)不用修改直接接收，一個(gè)大改，編輯讓重投。。
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- Optics Letters投稿一周收到編輯回信怎么只有一個(gè)審稿人的意見
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 關(guān)于optics and laser technology 審稿意見的問題
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 這樣的審稿意見可以申訴嗎？
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
- 投了篇small，審稿意見如下，修改后重投有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
- 有誰知道Optics Letters的審稿政策（審稿人多久不回復(fù)就換審稿人？）
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- OE（optics express）這樣的審稿意見還有改的必要嗎？
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)問這樣的審稿意見修改后錄用的幾率大嗎
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 投Applied Optics返回審稿意見，懇請(qǐng)各位看看給點(diǎn)意見
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 大家討論一下 審稿人 幾天就返回審稿意見 該意見是好還是壞？？
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 一個(gè)月前投的PTL，這樣的審稿意見中的機(jī)會(huì)大么？
已經(jīng)有31人回復(fù)
- IEEE 投稿后只返回一個(gè)專家的審稿意見，其它6個(gè)審稿人都拒審，文章還有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- RSC的雜志，拒稿重投（reject and resubmssion）還需要回復(fù)審稿人意見嗎？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- PRB這樣的審稿意見算是大修還是小修？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- chinese optics letters要審稿費(fèi)嗎
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 大家?guī)兔催@樣的審稿意見還有必要改嗎，還是改投別的期刊呀！
已經(jīng)有23人回復(fù)
- 我給國外期刊文章的審稿結(jié)果和審稿意見
已經(jīng)有178人回復(fù)
successfulsbl
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 2006 (講師)
- 金幣: 15721.6
- 紅花: 45
- 帖子: 3388
- 在線: 851.9小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 286119
- 注冊(cè): 2006-10-15
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 有機(jī)分子功能材料化學(xué)
2樓2013-11-11 05:31:44
machi188
新蟲 (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 4.5
- 帖子: 15
- 在線: 10.7小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1147601
- 注冊(cè): 2010-11-15
- 專業(yè): 光學(xué)
3樓2013-11-11 06:10:00
sunmy85
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 31 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 2999.1
- 紅花: 6
- 帖子: 302
- 在線: 117.5小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 609520
- 注冊(cè): 2008-09-22
- 專業(yè): 激光
4樓2013-11-11 08:04:05
qqppaa1
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 110 (高中生)
- 金幣: 5390.4
- 散金: 1814
- 紅花: 16
- 帖子: 1993
- 在線: 842.8小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1129626
- 注冊(cè): 2010-10-22
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 光學(xué)
5樓2013-11-11 09:06:19
6樓2013-11-11 09:31:53
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 machi188 的主題更新
| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料考研調(diào)劑 +3 | xwt。 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 285化工學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑（081700） +11 | 柴郡貓_ 2026-03-12 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085410人工智能專碩317求調(diào)劑（0854都可以） +3 | xbxudjdn 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑，一作一項(xiàng)核心論文五項(xiàng)專利，省、國級(jí)證書40+數(shù)一英一287 +8 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)319求調(diào)劑 +6 | 錦鯉0909 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | pupcoco 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +6 | 簡單點(diǎn)0 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +9 | yy要上岸呀 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 被我言中：新模板不強(qiáng)調(diào)格式了，假專家開始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學(xué) 生命科學(xué)與健康學(xué)院-課題組招收2026級(jí)食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本人考085602 化學(xué)工程 專碩 +16 | 不知道叫什么！ 2026-03-15 | 18/900 |
|
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | p asserby. 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 有沒有道鐵/土木的想調(diào)劑南林，給自己招師弟中～ +3 | TqlXswl 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | 八6八68 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 求調(diào)劑 +13 | enenenhui 2026-03-13 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢(mèng)微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +4 | 學(xué)海漂泊 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +5 | 超級(jí)伊昂大王 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|