| 15 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2747 | 回復: 14 | |||
[交流]
屌絲求助!這樣的Decision讓人忍無可忍!!想申述,請問成功的幾率大么?好心人幫忙
|
|||
|
Ms. No.: xxxx Title: xxxx Corresponding Author: xxxx Dear xxx, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to the Journal of Solid State Chemistry. Your paper, referenced above, has been reviewed by experts in the field. Based on the comments of these reviewers, we regret to inform you that we are unable to accept your manuscript for publication in the Journal of Solid State Chemistry. The comments of the reviewers are included below in order for you to understand the basis for our decision, and we hope that their thoughtful comments will help you in your future studies. While you may be disappointed by this decision, I would like to urge you to continue to consider the Journal of Solid State Chemistry for publication of future manuscripts. Reviewers' comments if comments are not present please click on reviewer attachment link in EES)Reviewer #1: In this article the authors present xxx. The article goes well with the new trends in acid-base catalysis. They characterized the catalyst using different techniques (FT-IR, XPS, TEM, N2-adsorption pore distribution, TGA). They examined the catalytic properties of the prepared polymers using Knoevenagel condensation and Michael addition reactions and compared their activity with classical catalysts (CaO, ..). I recommend the publication of this article in JSSC provided the authors address the following points: - Language, grammar, punctuation needs extensive editing - Pores were described in the article as nanopores and mesopores. They all should be classified as nanopores. - XPS figures of C showed two deconvoluted peaks of different intensities. On page 6, the authors assigned them to C=C and C-N of the ring. I believe the high intensity should be assigned to C-C of the backbone of the polymer and the low intensity to the C in the ring. - Figure 3 showing the contact angle is meaningless, it should be omitted. It should be replaced by the TEM figure in the supplementary. - Since the polymers contain basic sites, the authors should report the pH of the surface. Reviewer #2: The manuscript, "xxx" written by xxx presents the result of xxx. The manuscript is not publishable in JSSC because of the following comments. [1] The title "xxxxx" should be modified because it implication is too wide and further English is wrong. [2] In the experimental section, there is no description for the characterization method though the manuscript was submitted as a full length article though it appeared in the supplementary information [3] The supplementary data should be appeared in the main text, not SI only. [4] The adsorption data in Figure 4 has been misinterpreted completely. In the absence of the description on the method for the adsorption measurement, the adsorption data can also be interpreted as the sum of adsorption and absorption. The previous report by the same author showed more reasonable adsorption quantity (xxx) [5] Superhydrphobic may have the same meaning as the superwettability for organic compound. [6] For knoevenagel condensation and michael addition, please use large capital K and M. As a whole, the manuscript is not organized well and it needs complete restructuring. Therefore, the manuscript should be rejected. 本來就很屌絲了!感覺他媽的被黑了 ,請問大家怎么申述?多謝交流幫忙。 |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/391
+1/190
+1/50
+1/42
+2/40
+1/38
+1/37
+1/29
+1/27
+2/18
+1/17
+1/12
+1/11
+1/9
+1/8
+3/7
+1/7
+1/6
+1/5
+1/3
|
遇到這種情況,剛開始都會有憤怒感,可以理解。。。。 但。。!這不是解決思路,不建議你申訴,有許多期刊都是一票否決制,申訴成功的幾率幾乎沒有,而且,以你目前的情緒,申訴恐怕會變成吵架,只會在這個領域給自己樹立敵人,毫無益處,除非你或者你老板和editor熟悉,editor才會有心思瞟一眼你的申訴信,否則,一般都會直接忽略掉,他們收到那么多的投稿,多數都是需要拒掉的,好多都想申訴,他們根本沒心思搭理你的,這個成功的幾率和買彩票差不多。 不如自己把這個放在一邊,緩兩天,調整下情緒,然后仔細讀一讀他們的意見,逐條認真修改,再投,或者轉投其他的。。。 |
| 15 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[基金申請] 面上5B能上會嗎? +4 | redcom 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 296求調劑 +5 | 彼岸t 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調劑 +13 | 新時代材料 2026-03-27 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 食品工程專碩一志愿中海洋309求調劑 +4 | 小張zxy張 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學化學0703總分337求調劑 +5 | niko- 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學求調劑 +9 | 奶油草莓. 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +6 | 蘆lty 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿9,初試成績:338,四六級已過,有科研經歷,求調劑! +4 | Zuhui0306 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工(0856)304求B區(qū)調劑 +8 | 邱gl 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調劑 +12 | PolarBear11 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +3 | 加油沖。 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 08開頭275求調劑 +4 | 拉誰不重要 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 315調劑 +4 | 0860求調劑 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調劑。有半年電池和半年高分子實習經歷 +10 | 材料學257求調劑 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學339材料與化工求調劑 +3 | 江往賣魚 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航 335分 | 0856材料化工 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經歷 +6 | cccchenso 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理-080500 材料求調劑 +4 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 機械學碩總分317求調劑。。。 +4 | Acaciad 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研一志愿蘇州大學初始315(英一)求調劑 +3 | sbdksD 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[有機交流]
20+3
|
FENGSHUJEI 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|