| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 975 | 回復(fù): 4 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
wohenhao55木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
將軍,啊哈哈
|
[求助]
如何答復(fù)審稿人? 已有3人參與
|
||
|
各位,新年好!年底投了一篇電化學(xué)學(xué)報(bào),審稿意見(jiàn)回來(lái)了,如下: Reviewer #3. This is an interesting contribution but, I am not sure, if it fits well Electrochimica Acta. The electrochemical part, in term of electrochemical characterization is quite limited. The word "electrochemical" in the tule is misleading and it shall be replaced with "physicochemical". The authors need to clarify potential utility of their system to the electrochemcal science and technology starting from Introductioin to Conclusions. 其中“The authors need to clarify potential utility of their system to the electrochemcal science and technology starting from Introductioin to Conclusions. ”像這樣通篇加內(nèi)容的如何修改?沒(méi)遇到這種情況,請(qǐng)前輩指教,謝謝。 [ Last edited by wohenhao55 on 2014-1-28 at 16:20 ] |

鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
|
審稿人的意思是,你的文章不適合這個(gè)雜志,在electrochemical分析部分,你做的實(shí)際是physicochemical。你需要把這部分內(nèi)容改改,要寫(xiě)的更符合electrochemica的方向。 因?yàn)椴欢愕姆较,所以沒(méi)法說(shuō)的更詳細(xì)了 |
木蟲(chóng) (職業(yè)作家)
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|