| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1234 | 回復(fù): 3 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
qcd1988至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
審稿意見回復(fù) 已有1人參與
|
|
|
2個審稿人,一個小修同意,一個拒稿,主編給機會大修,該如何回復(fù)。 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. One of the reviewers rejected the manuscript but after careful consideration I have decided to give you a chance to revise the manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. Please give a careful consideration to the criticisms raised. All of them should be taken into account in a revised version of your manuscript. Because of the extensive comments made and the criticism raised, your revised manuscript will be sent to both referees for rereview. If any of the referees declines the revised manuscript or major revisions are requested again, I will have to decline the manuscript since we cannot go back and forth with the reviewers numerous times. So, please try to do a really good job in the revision of the manuscript. Reviewer #1: Overall, this is an interesting investigation providing experimental results on XXX. The research is well designed and carried out with sound conclusions. English language is very good with no grammatical errors. I have only some minor comments that could make the paper even better. Reviewer #2: In this paper about the XXX authors have proposed the promotion of XXX. An experimental result is good situation to XXX. However, such an experimental result has already been reported by some papers. The point is "XXX?" However, the author has not considered this point. Moreover, the author is mentioning the reference 29 as a paper of XXX. However, the principle of the XXX is not shown in the reference 29. Therefore, I think that this paper is imperfect. 一個月大修時間,拒稿這個人意見如何回復(fù),跪求大神。 |

至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)

金蟲 (正式寫手)
| 應(yīng)該還是比較好改的,第一個審稿人的意見非常的正面,這個就不多說了。第二個審稿人的意見中,最關(guān)鍵的一點就是以前有人做過類似的實驗,這個問題一定要回答好,明確說明與審稿人所說的那實驗的不同以及此改動帶來的意義,這個應(yīng)該也還是很好辦的,很多實驗中,一個條件不一樣,就算是兩個完全不同的實驗了。至于審稿人提到的那個神馬點,實驗不能面面俱到是大家都知道的,你只要再強調(diào)下你現(xiàn)在所做實驗的意義就行了,當(dāng)然這個神馬點不能影響到文章所得出的結(jié)論,否則得再修改下結(jié)論給出限制條件。至于講的那個什么參考文獻(xiàn)問題,從學(xué)術(shù)道德上講起來是大問題,但這問題修改起來應(yīng)該是非常容易的,直接換掉就OK了嘛。 |

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工(085600)296求調(diào)劑 +17 | 稻妻小編 2026-03-26 | 17/850 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 309求調(diào)劑 +7 | 誰不是少年 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 356求調(diào)劑 +3 | gysy?s?a 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | wulanna 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +12 | PolarBear11 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +7 | A child 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-314 +3 | LILIQQ 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[材料工程] 一志愿C9材料與化工專業(yè)總分300求調(diào)劑 +8 | 曼111 2026-03-24 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)/290求調(diào)劑/本科經(jīng)歷豐富/工科也可 +9 | 丹青奶蓋 2026-03-26 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大總分298分,前三科223分 +5 | dongfang59 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +11 | 陽陽哇塞 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)280分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 722865 2026-03-23 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 08開頭275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拉誰不重要 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
材料學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑
6+5
|
糖葫蘆888ll 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 351求調(diào)劑 +4 | 麥克阿磊 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | Dendel 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)調(diào)劑一志愿上海交通大學(xué)336分-本科上海211 +4 | 小魚愛有機 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | 話梅糖111 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | ALULU4408 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|