 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5070 | 回復: 17 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
liusongkai新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 初審意見如下，大神們幫小弟看看！散盡金幣！ 已有1人參與
|
||
|
Body: After careful review we have determined that your paper might be of interest for publication in the IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, after revisions, if those revisions fully and properly address the concerns of the reviewers. The comments from the reviewers appearing below may include specific revisions that are mandatory and other changes suggested. You may have to make broader changes if necessary based on general comments provided by the reviewers. I wish to emphasize that this is not a conditional acceptance. It is, rather, a recognition by our reviewers and editors that your paper merits some interest. The reviewers of the original draft will be approached to assess the revised manuscript; at the discretion of the editor, additional reviewers may be included. Please submit your revised paper within 60 days of receiving this letter. After 60 days the revision will expire and you will need an extension in order to submit the revised paper. We encourage you to include an explanation of how you responded to the comments by the reviewers to help expedite our review. Please include this explanation in the space provided for "response to reviewers" and "response to editor" when you upload the revision. Please note that you should submit your revised paper following the latest author's guidelines (We have had direct author upload since January 7, 2002). See the Author's Kit on: www.ieee.org/organizations/society/power/subpages/authors.html Also, directions are contained at the end of this email. WE ARE AUTOMATICALLY INFORMED WHEN YOU UPLOAD YOUR REVISION AND RESPONSES SO PLEASE DO NOT SEND EMAIL TO ME THAT YOU SUBMITTED YOUR PAPER, AND PLEASE DO NOT SEND ME YOUR PAPER AS EMAIL ATTACHMENT. Thanks, Prof. Antonio Conejo, Editor in Chief, Transactions on Power Systems COMMENTS TO THE AUTHORS: Editor's Comments: Editor Comments to the Author: The reviewers indicated several concerns related to this paper with which I agree. Reviewer # 1 (private communication) has expressed concerns about publication and makes two important points regarding the nature of the assumptions adopted in the paper and the lack of novel ideas. Reviewer # 2, on the other hand, raises additional issues and asks for clarifications to the proposed method. These are very serious issues that require a clear and unambiguous response. Please respond in full to all of the reviewers’ concerns and revise and resubmit your paper. Reviewers' Comments: Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author This paper proposes a data mining approach for estimating the voltage stability margins. The simulation data from a simple model and a medium size model are used to establish and validate the estimation models. The study is done reasonably well. Yet, there are some concerns from the reviewer on the approach used. 1) When a generator reaches its VAR limits, the corresponding PV bus shall be changed to a PQ bus. This is a sudden change of the power flow model and corresponding Jacobian matrix. Please discuss how the conversion of PV to PQ bus may influence the proposed method. 2) How is the number of sample cases determined? For the 1648-bus system, 17472 cases were used by the authors. For the 21-bus system, 6035 cases were used. Obviously, the larger a system is, the more cases are required. How would a user know whether there are sufficient cases for training a model? When training data are not complete and model structures are not sufficiently, the estimation model established using training data can only reflect partial features of the system. It may be helpful to discuss how a user may determine whether the model and data are sufficient. 3) Because the testing data sets are not publicly available, it is hard to verify results of the proposed data-based estimation approach. 4) Please clarify the definition of x and y axis of Fig 2 on page 2. Are they load changes in MW or not? Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author I would like to comment the authors for the clear writing style they used in this paper. I do have concerns and questions regarding the applicability of the proposed method in this paper: 1- The most important reservation I have about this paper is the constraint on the network topology. Network topology changes according to operational requirements such as economic dispatch or optimal power flow. The network hardly stays the same. Section H. 2nd para says if 3 equipment are out of service in a a large network then the method is not accurate, this would not be acceptable. 2- The method is building a database then matches online measurements to their specific VSM in the database. An online method should do more with online measurements (e.g. building real time dynamic models) and do less with a database built around a network not matching the real time network in most cases 3- The incremental benefit the proposed method would bring vis a vis other methods should be clearer. I do not see a small increase in accuracy versus other transparent methods is enough. 4- The range of the variables data is very big (e. g. look at Fig. 10): DO the authors believe it is possible to obtain such a large range of of measurements is feasible in normal operations? The method should build its foundations on very recent measurements (quasi static measurements) and while the load is going up. The range of variables data should be limited in the study. 5- Line 55 of page 5 says R2 > 0.953 is acceptable based on experimental results, has such results been published? 6- The use of the word 'got' is confusing inside this paper; do the authors mean 'obtained' or 'good'? 08-Mar-2014 |
回復此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 Cover_Letter |
» 猜你喜歡
請問共同通訊和共同一作的認可度問題
已經有4人回復
-
286分調劑
已經有22人回復
-
材料調劑
已經有4人回復
-
085600 295分求調劑
已經有19人回復
-
材料調劑
已經有4人回復
-
302求調劑一志愿華中師范大學
已經有3人回復
-
環(huán)境285分，過六級，求調劑
已經有5人回復
-
08工科求調劑290分
已經有8人回復
-
321求調劑 一志愿 浙江工業(yè)大學生物醫(yī)藥
已經有4人回復
-
266分，一志愿電氣工程，本科材料，求材料專業(yè)調劑
已經有4人回復
» 本主題相關價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 求解XPS
已經有6人回復
wang2005054
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應助: 54 (初中生)
- 金幣: 3792.5
- 散金: 12
- 紅花: 12
- 帖子: 2389
- 在線: 98.7小時
- 蟲號: 279291
- 注冊: 2006-09-16
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 分析儀器與試劑
4樓2014-03-10 13:07:26
2樓2014-03-10 12:47:20
longzexiao
金蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應助: 5 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 835.3
- 散金: 500
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 107
- 在線: 53.1小時
- 蟲號: 2685197
- 注冊: 2013-09-27
- 專業(yè): 電磁場與波
3樓2014-03-10 12:57:23
傷噠心
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應助: 853 (博后)
- 金幣: 37537.8
- 紅花: 32
- 帖子: 8970
- 在線: 973.1小時
- 蟲號: 1333010
- 注冊: 2011-06-28
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 集成電路設計與測試
5樓2014-03-10 13:30:53
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 270求調劑 +8 | 小杰pp 2026-03-31 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 311求調劑 +14 | 藍月亮亮 2026-03-30 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調劑11408 +4 | 劉小鹿lu 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600，材料與化工321分調劑 +8 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調劑0702 +3 | 梅子味晚霞 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學324求調劑 +11 | hanamiko 2026-04-01 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266分，一志愿電氣工程，本科材料，求材料專業(yè)調劑 +10 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-04-01 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 食品學碩362求調劑 +3 | xuanxianxian 2026-04-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調劑0703 +5 | 周嘉堯 2026-03-31 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 358求調劑 +3 | 王向陽花 2026-03-31 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調劑 +7 | BrightLL 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 336材料求調劑 +10 | 陳瀅瑩 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 346求調劑 一志愿070303有機化學 +11 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 318求調劑 +10 | 陳晨79 2026-03-30 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調劑求院校招收 +7 | 鶴鯨鴿 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 08工科，295，接受跨專業(yè)調劑 +6 | lmnlzy 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調劑 +16 | kikiki7 2026-03-30 | 16/800 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085602化工求調劑（331分） +8 | 111@127 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研]
 105500藥學求調劑，一志愿山東大學藥學，348分
+3
|
gr哈哈哈 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085405 考的11408求各位老師帶走 +3 | Qiu學ing 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|