| 5 | 2/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5953 | 回復: 30 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
F_Shaw捐助貴賓 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
兩個審稿人給出了大改,但Associate Editor給了拒稿 已有3人參與
|
||
|
Dear Dr. XXXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising that we consider accepting your paper after major revision. However the needed revisions are too substantion to allow the paper to proceed without a second round of review. Please consider my rejection this version a "soft" decision. Both reviewers have indicated that they would like to see the revision and they will be invited to review the new submission. Both reviewers have agreed to be identified. XXXX is Reviewer #1, and XXXXX is Reivewer #2. Both reviewers have downloaded files in addition to the comments listed below. Let me know if you have any problems downloading this files. The one issue that must be addressed in a revision is a clear distinguition from previous publihsed papers. It is fine to document how new data supports conclusions made in prior work, but these must be significant advances and you must be clear as to why the new information either proves or disproves previous studies. Considering the extent of revision needed, I have not provided any editorial input to this version. I would be willing to help you with the revision prior to your formal resubmission. The easiest way to do this is for you to email me your revised manuscript (XXXXXXX) and we can work outside of the Elsevier system. ———————————————— Reviewer #1: The purpose of this paper, as poorly stated in lines 90-95,XXXXXX. I completely re-wrote this paper because without doing so, it would have been impossible to understand the aim of the work. Although the paper is very poorly written, it may be worthy of publication with major revisions. I have two major objections (items 1-2 below) and several recommendations for the authors. XXXXXXX ———————————————— Reviewer #2: The manuscript presented a valuable case study on XXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX. The data analysis is logical, the conclusions are convincing in general. The figures and tables are largely adequate to support the points made in the current manusript. The length of the manuscript is about right, although it could be slightly longer if the authors are going to make revisions according to the reviewer's suggestions. Major issues with the current manuscript include the following: XXXXXXXXX ______________________ 兩個審稿人提了很多意見,Associate Editor的意思是在我重投之前,可以協(xié)助我修改,工作量有點大! 各位蟲友有沒有這樣的經(jīng)歷,像這樣機會大不大? [ Last edited by F_Shaw on 2014-4-11 at 13:58 ] |

新蟲 (小有名氣)
![]() ![]() ![]() |
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 070300一志愿211,312分求調(diào)劑院校 +4 | 小黃鴨寶 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求化學調(diào)劑 +11 | wulanna 2026-03-28 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 282求調(diào)劑 +4 | wcq131415 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +6 | 冬十三 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑:一志愿湖南大學 材料與化工(085600),已過六級。 +4 | XX小鄧 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +6 | Amber00 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 352分-085602-一志愿985 +5 | 海納百川Ly 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +5 | 愛羈絆 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +3 | A child 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +12 | PolarBear11 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +6 | HanBeiNingZC 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化學調(diào)劑 +4 | 愛吃番茄的旭 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 林之夕 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | Dendel 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學339材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +3 | 江往賣魚 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 296求調(diào)劑 +4 | 汪!?! 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 各位老師您好:本人初試372分 +5 | jj涌77 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0854人工智能方向招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 章小魚567 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航材料專317分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 炸呀炸呀炸薯條 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求老師收我 +3 | zzh16938784 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|