| 24小時熱門版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 3/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 5895 | 回復(fù): 30 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
F_Shaw捐助貴賓 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
兩個審稿人給出了大改,但Associate Editor給了拒稿 已有3人參與
|
||
|
Dear Dr. XXXX, Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising that we consider accepting your paper after major revision. However the needed revisions are too substantion to allow the paper to proceed without a second round of review. Please consider my rejection this version a "soft" decision. Both reviewers have indicated that they would like to see the revision and they will be invited to review the new submission. Both reviewers have agreed to be identified. XXXX is Reviewer #1, and XXXXX is Reivewer #2. Both reviewers have downloaded files in addition to the comments listed below. Let me know if you have any problems downloading this files. The one issue that must be addressed in a revision is a clear distinguition from previous publihsed papers. It is fine to document how new data supports conclusions made in prior work, but these must be significant advances and you must be clear as to why the new information either proves or disproves previous studies. Considering the extent of revision needed, I have not provided any editorial input to this version. I would be willing to help you with the revision prior to your formal resubmission. The easiest way to do this is for you to email me your revised manuscript (XXXXXXX) and we can work outside of the Elsevier system. ———————————————— Reviewer #1: The purpose of this paper, as poorly stated in lines 90-95,XXXXXX. I completely re-wrote this paper because without doing so, it would have been impossible to understand the aim of the work. Although the paper is very poorly written, it may be worthy of publication with major revisions. I have two major objections (items 1-2 below) and several recommendations for the authors. XXXXXXX ———————————————— Reviewer #2: The manuscript presented a valuable case study on XXXXX. XXXXXXXXXX. The data analysis is logical, the conclusions are convincing in general. The figures and tables are largely adequate to support the points made in the current manusript. The length of the manuscript is about right, although it could be slightly longer if the authors are going to make revisions according to the reviewer's suggestions. Major issues with the current manuscript include the following: XXXXXXXXX ______________________ 兩個審稿人提了很多意見,Associate Editor的意思是在我重投之前,可以協(xié)助我修改,工作量有點大啊! 各位蟲友有沒有這樣的經(jīng)歷,像這樣機會大不大? [ Last edited by F_Shaw on 2014-4-11 at 13:58 ] |

捐助貴賓 (著名寫手)

![]() ![]() ![]() |
鐵桿木蟲 (知名作家)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿天大材料與化工(085600)總分338 +4 | 蔡大美女 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 324分 +8 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 能源材料化學(xué)課題組招收碩士研究生8-10名 +4 | 脫穎而出 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 267一志愿南京工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工求調(diào)劑 +8 | SUICHILD 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國海洋大學(xué),生物學(xué),301分,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 1孫悟空 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 314求調(diào)劑 +8 | 無懈可擊的巨人 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工一志愿南昌大學(xué)327求調(diào)劑推薦 +8 | Ncdx123456 2026-03-13 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +8 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑,一志愿華南理工大學(xué)071005 +4 | ioodiiij 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +4 | A_JiXing 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 梁成偉老師課題組歡迎你的加入 +8 | 一鴨鴨喲 2026-03-14 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | heming3743 2026-03-16 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 諾貝爾化學(xué)獎覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703 物理化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 我可以上岸的對?/a> 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求材料調(diào)劑 085600英一數(shù)二總分302 前三科235 精通機器學(xué)習(xí) 一志愿哈工大 +4 | 林yaxin 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +9 | Koxui 2026-03-12 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +4 | 芬達(dá)46 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 26讀博 +4 | Rui135246 2026-03-12 | 10/500 |
|