| 查看: 6566 | 回復(fù): 31 | ||
[求助]
Advanced Materials兩個(gè)接收一個(gè)拒能申訴嗎? 已有16人參與
|
||
|
Advanced Materials兩個(gè)接收一個(gè)拒,并且拒的理由是誤解了我的材料而說我沒有新意能申訴嗎? Reviewer's Responses to Questions Please rate the importance of this submission. Reviewer #1: Should be published in this journal Reviewer #2: Should be published as a VIP paper Reviewer #3: (No Response) -------------------- Please rate the originality of this submission. Reviewer #1: Acceptable level of new results Reviewer #2: Acceptable level of new results Reviewer #3: (No Response) -------------------- Please rate the scientific and technical content of this submission. Reviewer #1: Fully consistent and accurate Reviewer #2: Minor inconsistencies or inaccuracies Reviewer #3: (No Response) -------------------- Please rate the length of this submission. Reviewer #1: Concise and correct length Reviewer #2: Requires additional information Reviewer #3: (No Response) 第三個(gè)審稿人所有都是noresponse,審稿意見說我文章那個(gè)材料做這個(gè)應(yīng)用的有很多,說我文章沒新意,而且他說我表征不清楚兩種納米材料之間的作用,可是我的新意明明就是在一步合成的復(fù)合材料兼具兩種材料的優(yōu)勢而不是單獨(dú)的兩種納米材料相互組合啊,他根本沒理解我到底在做啥就提了三條意見,前兩條就是一個(gè)表征不清楚,而是有人做了沒新意,第三條是說文章需要潤色。。。這個(gè)審稿人是不是態(tài)度不認(rèn)真啊,申訴可能性大不大? 有沒有哪位蟲友有過類似經(jīng)歷? 謝謝大家! |

銀蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (著名寫手)
金蟲 (正式寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
沈益鋒

木蟲 (初入文壇)
chem

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|