| 8 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2296 | 回復(fù): 7 | |||
jstxrb至尊木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
看看這是大修還是小修啊
|
|
大家?guī)涂聪率切⌒捱是大修 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. When submitting your revised manuscript, please ensure that you upload the source files (e.g. Word). Uploading a PDF file at this stage will create delays should your manuscript be finally accepted for publication. If your revised submission does not include the source files, we will contact you to request them. When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items: Response to Reviewers (mandatory) This should be a separate file labeled "Response to Reviewers" that carefully addresses, point-by-point, the issues raised in the comments appended below. You should also include a suitable rebuttal to any specific request for change that you have not made. Mention the page, paragraph, and line number of any revisions that are made. Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory) We cannot accommodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal formatting guidelines. Figures and tables may be embedded within the source file for the submission as long as they are of sufficient resolution for Production. Refer to the Guide for Authors for additional information. Highlights (mandatory) Highlights consist of a short collection of bullet points that convey the core findings of the article and should be submitted in a separate file in the online submission system. Please use 'Highlights' in the file name and include 3 to 5 bullet points (maximum 85 characters, including spaces, per bullet point). See the following website for more information Graphical Abstract (optional) Graphical Abstracts should summarize the contents of the article in a concise, pictorial form designed to capture the attention of a wide readership online. Refer to the following website for more information: http://www.elsevier.com/graphicalabstracts PLEASE NOTE: would like to enrich online articles by displaying interactive figures that help the reader to visualize and explore your research results. For this purpose, we would like to invite you to upload figures in the MATLAB .FIG file format as supplementary material to our online submission system. Elsevier will generate interactive figures from these files and include them with the online article on SciVerse ScienceDirect. If you wish, you can submit .FIG files along with your revised submission. |
專(zhuān)家顧問(wèn) (著名寫(xiě)手)
![]() |
專(zhuān)家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +218 |
專(zhuān)家顧問(wèn) (正式寫(xiě)手)
Chemical NMRer
![]() |
專(zhuān)家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +63 |

至尊木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
|
第一個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn):Though some relevant references are quoted the authors of this paper show no real understanding of the vapor-gas diffusion problem which has been studied theoretically and experimentally for more than 50 years. Many relevant references are not given. The findings are qualitatively as one would expect. The quantitative results may be of value for those who might want results for this particular gas-vapor combination and the ranges of flow rates and conditions of these tests. The correlations given would be extremely unlikely to be valid in other circumstances. One would have expected to see Schmidt number in the equations. A purely theoretical solution could be done for the case of annular flow of condensate - very straightforward if gravity is neglected and the flow assumed laminar. This could form the basis of more general correlation but measurements other vapor-gas combinations would be needed. In short I consider this to be a beginning of what could be a useful investigation but much more work is needed.; 第二個(gè)審稿人都是技術(shù)問(wèn)題比較好解答; 我是屬于拒搞重投,第一個(gè)人審稿人還是原來(lái)的,我能直接問(wèn)他我要引用哪些論文嗎,貌似別人引用的我也引用了啊 |
至尊木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
|
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
專(zhuān)家顧問(wèn) (著名寫(xiě)手)
![]() |
專(zhuān)家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +218 |
| 8 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 081700化工學(xué)碩調(diào)劑 +3 | 【1】 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 ,六級(jí)已過(guò),有科研經(jīng)歷 +12 | 曦熙兮 2026-03-15 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考博] 東華理工大學(xué)化材專(zhuān)業(yè)26屆碩士博士申請(qǐng) +8 | zlingli 2026-03-13 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專(zhuān)業(yè)(081702)315分求調(diào)劑 +11 | yangfz 2026-03-17 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿:南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩,總分289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑,英語(yǔ)六級(jí)551,有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-16 | 12/600 |
|
|
[教師之家] 焦慮 +9 | 水冰月月野兔 2026-03-13 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +6 | knight344 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑 +15 | 大米飯! 2026-03-15 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +6 | 26研0 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研]
|
胡辣湯放糖 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +6 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +5 | 煙火先于春 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yy7400 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 太想進(jìn)步了0608 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢(mèng)微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 本科南京大學(xué)一志愿川大藥學(xué)327 +3 | 麥田耕者 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大材料324分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 閆旭東 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +4 | 學(xué)員97LZgn 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|