| 查看: 4677 | 回復(fù): 10 | |||
詹水清金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
審稿意見該如何回答,reconsider my decision是啥意思?
|
||
|
請(qǐng)教各位,我有一篇稿件,審稿意見如下,編輯說 I would be pleased to reconsider my decision是什么意思?修改稿還要修回進(jìn)行外審嗎,還是編輯自己會(huì)作決定??jī)蓚(gè)專家提到的加一個(gè)bubble force,以目前的知識(shí)水平目前實(shí)在是做不出來,而且也沒看到有人做,不知道該如何回復(fù)啊。如果我實(shí)話實(shí)說,編輯會(huì)怎么處理呢? Dear Dr. XXX Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: This paper studies the alumina dissolution process in alumina reduction cells using a computational modelling approach. The alumina dissolution determines the local concentration of alumina in an aluminium cell, and plays an important role in determining the cell performance. The topic and results are very interesting and novel. The only drawback is that the bubble driven flow is not considered in this paper. To my understanding, the alumina mixing process is dominantly driven by bubble induced flow, rather than the MHD force. It is better to state this in your revised manuscript. Reviewer #2: I agree that to my knowledge too it is the first paper on the full simulation process of alumina in a cell. Such a model is supposed to address both the sludge formation problem and the anode effect problem. You raise the sludge problem and the fact that at the end of your first and only feed cycle there is still 0.11 kg of undissolved alumina particle but there is no provision for sludge formation (particles crossing the bath-metal interface) and entering the metal in your model. You are acknowledging that the CO2 bubbles have an important impact on the bath flow yet you have decided to neglect that impact altogether. Obviously this means that the results presented in figure 4 due to the MHD flow presented in figure 3 is only a demonstration of concept not valid for industrial application. You are saying that you don't have access to enough computer resources to solve a fully coupled 4 phases flow by adding bubbles to your current model. I would argue that you should first solve a 2 phases flow that consider the MHD Lorentz force and the bubbles drag force on the bath flow. Second you should solve the TPPBM model without any coupling with the CFD flow solution obtained in the first phase as in my view that coupling has a negligible impact on the bath flow except in the 160 mm x 120 mm feeding area for the few seconds that you are actually feeding the particles to the bath. In order for your model to be able to predict anode effect problems, the model should be run enough feeding cycles to get away from your artificial initial uniform 2.5% dissolved alumina concentration in the bath and get to the quasi-steady-state dissolved alumina concentration distribution in the bath (of course using a bath flow that is considering the bubble drag force). Finally, under the current limitations of your model, I would far more interested to see more results in 3D around 1 feeder region. How fast are you adding your 1.8 kg of alumina particles in 1s, 2s 3s? In that region your fully couple CFD-TPPBM model is really ready for industrial applications, would it help alumina dissolution to add that 1.8 kg in 10s 20s? Minor revisions recommendations: -no need to write TAYLOR in capital letters in second page second to last paragraph -reference 22 was published in 2013 not 2010 -please specify the actual flow rate used in the presented results in the phrase: A total of 7.2 kg of alumina is fed ... at the end of the first paragraph of section 3. -the presented results gives the impression that this is only a 2D model, it would be nice to add a close-up figure showing the vertical alumina concentration and particles position at 1 feeder region about 10s to 20 s after feeding. Any particles reaching the bath-metal interface, if so at what speed? |

銅蟲 (小有名氣)
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
金蟲 (正式寫手)

超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
至尊木蟲 (文學(xué)泰斗)
金蟲 (正式寫手)

至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
|
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 請(qǐng)教下大家 2026年國家基金申請(qǐng)是雙盲審嗎? +3 | lishucheng1 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 335求調(diào)劑 +4 | yuyu宇 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境學(xué)碩288求調(diào)劑 +8 | 皮皮皮123456 2026-03-22 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩英一數(shù)二306 +8 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 336求調(diào)劑 +4 | 收到VS 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +9 | chuanzhu川燭 2026-03-18 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求老師收我 +3 | zzh16938784 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 315分,誠求調(diào)劑,材料與化工085600 +3 | 13756423260 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩301分求調(diào)劑 +7 | Liyouyumairs 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
Grand777 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | 余意卿 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +12 | 呼呼呼。。。。 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境總分308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | Mqqqqqq 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 初始318分求調(diào)劑(有工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)) +3 | 1911236844 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小材化本科 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 261求B區(qū)調(diào)劑,科研經(jīng)歷豐富 +3 | 牛奶很忙 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
申請(qǐng)回稿延期一個(gè)月,編輯同意了。但系統(tǒng)上的時(shí)間沒變,給編輯又寫郵件了,沒回復(fù)
10+3
|
wangf9518 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|