| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1697 | 回復(fù): 2 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
曉霧迷晨鐵蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
論文被electrochemica Acta 拒搞,編輯建議修改重投,有戲嗎?
|
||
|
On the whole, the recommendations could leave some chance for the paper to be prepared in a more acceptable form for publication, but it is however clear that the manuscript has to be substantially revised and improved, practically rewritten. In particular, the comments of Referee 1 are especially severe. Under similar circumstances, from an editorial point of view the manuscript can only be PROVISIONALLY REJECTED. This means that, if you wish, you may resubmit a new manuscript based on this work. It is up to you to judge whether you will be able to present convincing arguments to the referees, particularly to Referee 1. In resubmitting a new version, please be aware that the new manuscript has to go to the relevant reviewers for further perusal and should thus either conform to or adequately rebut their requests. In any case the new manuscript will receive a different registration number. In particular, I urge you to conform to the TECHNICAL EDITORIAL ISSUES as well as to the guidelines regarding HIGHLIGHTS. Reviewer #1: The revised manuscript does not address the main points of the review comments. To make my comments clear (….the influence of length and morphology on the photoactivity……)In the manuscript, the increase of photoconversion efficiency for the tubes from different electrolytes is associated to different reasons. In the present state the results are not really convincing to support the conclusions. Therefore I cannot recommend the manuscript to be published. 審稿人1第一次說(shuō)我的文章沒(méi)有新意,修改后回復(fù)如上,說(shuō)文章分析不全面,和目前很多文章不太吻合之類,堅(jiān)持cannot recommend the manuscript to be published。 Reviewer #2: The authors have adequately addressed the reviewers' concerns, especially those pertaining to the quality of the sample preparation. The revised manuscript has been improved and therefore, I recommend publication in Electrochimica Acta after a refinement of the English on the revised/new text. 審稿人2覺(jué)得修改的可以,推薦錄用了~再改改語(yǔ)言 然后編輯給了rejected,這種情況修改重投希望大嗎?或者直接換個(gè)影響因子低 一點(diǎn)的投? |
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
銀蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 330分求調(diào)劑 +5 | qzenlc 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 各位老師好,我的一志愿為北京科技大學(xué)085601材料專碩 +7 | Koxui 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +3 | 種圣賜 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 爭(zhēng)取九點(diǎn)睡 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 311(085601)求調(diào)劑 +4 | liziyeyeye 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程,267求調(diào)劑 +16 | minht 2026-03-26 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +15 | hhhhxn.. 2026-03-23 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研] 材料292調(diào)劑 +12 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +3 | 加油沖啊! 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
材料學(xué)碩,求調(diào)劑
6+5
|
糖葫蘆888ll 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研]
|
鐘llll 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 336材料求調(diào)劑 +7 | 陳瀅瑩 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 總分293求調(diào)劑 +6 | 加一一九 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 309求調(diào)劑 +4 | gajsj 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 303求調(diào)劑 +6 | 藍(lán)山月 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +6 | 032500 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理-080500 材料求調(diào)劑 +4 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械學(xué)碩總分317求調(diào)劑。。! +4 | Acaciad 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +3 | whh869393 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山東大學(xué)藥學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | 開(kāi)開(kāi)心心沒(méi)煩惱 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|