| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1467 | 回復: 5 | ||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
wangyslyh金蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
小白初投CL被拒(允許重投),求大神幫忙看看再投希望大嗎? 已有2人參與
|
|
|
Dear Author(s): The review of the referenced manuscript, CL2014-*, is now complete. I regret to inform you that based on the enclosed reviews and my own reading of your manuscript, I am unable to recommend its publication in IEEE Communications Letters. After reading the whole paper, although the main idea is clearly presented, I don't find a great enthusiasm for recommending this paper for publication in its current form. Indeed, the contribution of this paper is unclear compared to existing works in the literature. Besides, the objective function adopted in the paper requires more explanation. Furthermore, the presentation styles need to be improved. It is for these reasons that I cannot accept the paper in its current form. Suggestion: Reject and Resubmission is Allowed Major comments: [1] The physical meaning of the objective function in equation (1) is not clear to me. In particular, * which needs more explanation. Besides, please indicates the unit of variable y since * . [2] It is known that when the EE maximized, it's possible that the system data rate can be very low . Thus, in the literature, minimum system data rate requirement is added as a constraint to the problem formulation. [3] The current * algorithm achieves a stationary point. However , it's unclear what is the *. [4] In a two-tier network, how do you*? [5] what is *? Minor comments: [1] all the log function should be base 2. [2] After equation (5), W is used as subcarrier bandwidth. However, W is used as total system bandwidth in the simulation section. [3] Please pay attention on the font type: say in equation (1), the font type of "maximize" [4] Please put the optimization variables under the "maximize" operator. You may revise and resubmit your manuscript to IEEE Communications Letters. Additional comments include: The reviewers' comments are found at the end of this email. Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author In this paper, the authors proposed to use* to solve the problem of *. They tried to *. Based on my review, I have the following comments: 1. In Introduction, the authors should specify the differences between this work and existing ones, and then summarize the contributions of this work. 2. The authors should discuss more about the implementation issues, such as the distributed implementation manner as the authors claimed. 3. More explanation should be given to the simulation results, not just tell what we can see in the figures. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This letter studies *, which is an important and timely topic. The quality of presentation is good and generally the paper is well-written. However, I have two basic concerns. 1) Why do you need the metric in (P1) to motivate*? According to the reviewer's opinion * is not a straightforward objective and must be explained better. 2) Please compare your work with [6] in the introduction, since the objective and the analysis followed in this work is similar to yours. Moreover, please add numbers to all the equations in order to facilitate the readers to refer to them. Also, add the following reference: ***, vol. 1, no.1, June 2014 Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author This paper studies *. The *, the optimal solution to which is rigorously characterized. This paper is well-written and technically sound. One suggestion is on further explanation on the objective functions of P1, P2 and Pk. From the title and abstract, it can be seen that * is the aim of this work; and exactly the objective function of P1 is *. However, P1 is not the problem to be solved in this paper, and the actual objective functions of the*. This could lead the audience to an impression that energy-efficiency is not really the objective. Another suggestion is to number all equations. |
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)

金蟲 (初入文壇)
木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 食品工程專碩一志愿中海洋309求調劑 +4 | 小張zxy張 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程求調劑 +11 | 多久上課 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大材料工程290求調劑 +11 | Youth_ 2026-03-30 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 279求調劑 +12 | j的立方 2026-03-29 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 367求調劑 +5 | 芋泥啵! 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 359求調劑 +5 | 王了個楠 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[有機交流] 考研調劑 +8 | watb 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿廈門大學材料工程專碩354找調劑。! +5 | 貝唄鋇鋇 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 08工科,295,接受跨專業(yè)調劑 +3 | lmnlzy 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請] 面上5B能上會嗎? +7 | redcom 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +4 | QiMing7 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 311求調劑 +6 | 冬十三 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調劑 +5 | BrightLL 2026-03-29 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料化工調劑 總分330 +14 | zhubinhao 2026-03-27 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,專業(yè)課化工原理,321分求調劑 +5 | 大饞小子 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 305求調劑 +8 | RuiFairyrui 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 壓國家一區(qū)線,求導師收留,有恩必謝! +7 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調劑 +5 | 舊吢 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 086000調劑 +3 | 7901117076 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理-080500 材料求調劑 +4 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|