| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4893 | 回復(fù): 9 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿(mǎn)足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
詹水清金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[求助]
修改意見(jiàn)是小修還是大修?已經(jīng)又返回去外審了,不懂!求教! 已有6人參與
|
|
|
請(qǐng)教各位,我的稿件之前已經(jīng)修改過(guò)一次,第一次給的修改意見(jiàn)較多;這次又叫我修改第二次,下面為編輯發(fā)來(lái)的修改意見(jiàn),這次不知道是大修還是小修;兩次修改回來(lái)的狀態(tài)都是revise,看不出大修還是小修;可是這次修改后,實(shí)際上自己修改的地方不多,提交后編輯又送外審了;請(qǐng)問(wèn)大家我這種情況最終錄用的概率有多大? Ms. Ref. No.: ******* Dear Dr.******* Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Your username is: Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The paper revised substantially according to the reviewers' comments. The bubble driven flow is difficult to model as the authors claimed, and a simplified model is applied in this work. Actually, there are progresses on the bubble driven flow work in the literature that can be referenced: Kaiyu Zhang, Yuqing Feng, Phil Schwarz, Zhaowen Wang and Mark Cooksey, Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling of bubble dynamics in the aluminum smelting process, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2013, 52 (33), pp 11378-11390 Y.Q. Feng, W. Yang, M. Cooksey and P. Schwarz, "Development of bubble driven flow CFD model applied for aluminium smelting cells", The Journal of Computational Multiphase Flow, 2010, 2, 179-188. Note that the bubble induced turbulence play an important role for alumina dispersion. The drag coefficient in ACD is different from the free rising region. While it is ok to use a simplified model, at least the others' model development work should be fairly cited. Otherwise, the paper gives an impression that the authors want to hide their weakness, e,g. the bubble driven model is even not mentioned in their first draft. Reviewer #2: Greatly improved paper since first version. Looking forward for following publications as the work presented in this paper is only the beginning! I hope you will also be presenting that work or even better some follow-up work at the ICSOBA 2014 conference in October: http://www.icsoba.info/icsoba-2014 On second reading, I think that there is even more physic involved than you are describing in your model! In order to solve the heat transfer model, you must also solve for the bath temperature (TL) yet you are not discussing about that at all. In addition to the heat exchanged with the colder alumina particles, the bath is gaining heat from the Joule heating and is loosing heat through the ledge, anodes and metal pad. I assume that you are not solving for the local variation of the bath temperature in your model? Yet, a local addition of cold alumina particles will significantly drop the bath temperature at that location. If the bath temperature is considered constant, please comment on the impact of that simplification on the alumina dissolution rate prediction. Even more important, the liquidus temperature (Tliq) depends on the bath dissolved alumina concentration http://www.peter-entner.com/E/Theory/ElProp/LiquTemp.aspx, you could compute Tliq locally as function of the local dissolved alumina concentration, are you doing it? If not, please again comment on the impact of that simplification on the alumina dissolution rate prediction. First paragraph of section 3, it is still not clear how you add alumina particles. There is a feeding period of 144 seconds so every 144 seconds 7.2 kg of alumina particles are added to the cell. But this is not a continuous addition, clearly from figure 5 we can see that at time 10 seconds, no more particles are added. What is the mass flow rate of the alumina particles addition or the duration of the alumina particles addition at the beginning of the simulation? You commented on the fact that "only" 0.063 kg of particles is felt at the end of the 144 seconds feeding cycle in the Model verification section. Clearly you cannot sludge a cell in a single feeding cycle, but at 144 seconds per feeding cycle, that represent 600 feeding cycles per day so 37.8 kg of sludge accumulation per day. Without back feeding, this sludge will keep accumulating day after day! [ Last edited by cxksama on 2014-8-7 at 09:45 ] |

鐵蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)

|
本帖內(nèi)容被屏蔽 |
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +3 | 陽(yáng)陽(yáng)哇塞 2026-03-14 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +4 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[教師之家] 焦慮 +8 | 水冰月月野兔 2026-03-13 | 10/500 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 被我言中:新模板不強(qiáng)調(diào)格式了,假專(zhuān)家開(kāi)始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +5 | 搗蛋豬豬 2026-03-11 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 考研化學(xué)學(xué)碩調(diào)劑,一志愿985 +4 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專(zhuān)碩326求調(diào)劑 +6 | 墨煜姒莘 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工專(zhuān)碩調(diào)劑 +5 | heming3743 2026-03-16 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 267一志愿南京工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工求調(diào)劑 +6 | SUICHILD 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +3 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703 物理化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | 我可以上岸的對(duì)?/a> 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0856專(zhuān)碩279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 加油加油!? 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料080500調(diào)劑求收留 +3 | 一顆meteor 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | ?醬給調(diào)劑跪了 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工(0856)304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑 +6 | 邱gl 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑一志愿 985 總分 295 +8 | dream…… 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 工科,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 我887 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 18880831720 2026-03-11 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211化學(xué)學(xué)碩310分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 努力奮斗112 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 070303一志愿西北大學(xué)學(xué)碩310找調(diào)劑 +3 | d如愿上岸 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|