| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3708 | 回復(fù): 8 | ||
shaka-fz新蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[求助]
大修之后小修,小修之后被拒了,但是有重投機會,求問我該怎么辦? 已有1人參與
|
|
我之前投了一篇文章給Biosensors and Bioelectronics。第一次審稿意見是大修,兩個審稿人,我修回之后,又要求重修。然后回來的意見是一個收一個拒。編輯說有機會重投。我截取編輯和審稿人意見到下面,求高手幫我分析一下我該怎么辦? Dear Prof. *****, Your paper has been reviewed and we have carefully considered all our referees' comments concerning your manuscript and reviewed your manuscript. We have unfortunately decided not to publish your paper in Biosensors and Bioelectronics on this occasion. However, we would be happy to review your re-submission, as a new submission via the website, if you would like to revise your paper according to our reviewers' comments. In order for us to deal with this rapidly could you please provide a detailed letter containing the manuscript number and your responses specifically and clearly to EACH point raised in the referees' reports. For each point, please (a) list the Referees questions; (b) indicate whether you agree or disagree with the referee and why; (c) describe what specific changes have been made in response to the points in the revised manuscript and in which pages. Please also highlight the changes to the manuscript in RED. We trust that you will not be discouraged from submitting further papers to us in the future. We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for choosing Biosensors and Bioelectronics as your publishing medium. We have done our utmost to process your manuscript swiftly and fairly. You are welcome to write to us if you believe that we have made a factual error, but in matters of discretion the Editors' decision is final. Biosensors and Bioelectronics is the principal international journal in its field and is seeking to maintain and continually improve its reputation for publishing top quality papers. We wish you every success with your future endeavours and hope that we will receive further submissions from you in the future. The reviewers' comments are appended below. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: In the second revision of manuscript, The author just answered my questions, no additional experiment and analysis were added. I still did not satisfy the quality of the manuscript and am not sure if it can be published in BB. It may be batter to ask another reviewer to review this manuscript. The reviewer I suggested is Prof****** (這里他推薦了另一個審稿人) who works on ……(這里是那個審稿人的研究領(lǐng)域)。 請問我該怎么辦?是加數(shù)據(jù)還是?因為那些數(shù)據(jù)是不適合加的,而這個審稿人執(zhí)意要我加,我解釋過,他居然就不給機會直接拒了。如果我現(xiàn)在加了數(shù)據(jù)重新投稿,結(jié)果不是送給這個審稿人,那豈不是又要被挑刺?如果我不加數(shù)據(jù)直接投稿,如果送回給這個審稿人,那肯定悲劇,而且編輯肯定也不會高興的。 |
榮譽版主 (文壇精英)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
榮譽版主 (文壇精英)
榮譽版主 (文壇精英)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
榮譽版主 (文壇精英)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
榮譽版主 (文壇精英)
| 9 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +3 | pupcoco 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +11 | zjl的號 2026-03-16 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +4 | knight344 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學(xué) 生命科學(xué)與健康學(xué)院-課題組招收2026級食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +4 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | heming3743 2026-03-16 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | 八旬速覽 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +6 | 步川酷紫123 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 文思客 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 諾貝爾化學(xué)獎覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085600調(diào)劑 +5 | 漾漾123sun 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉夢微 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 本科南京大學(xué)一志愿川大藥學(xué)327 +3 | 麥田耕者 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 中科大材料專碩319求調(diào)劑 +3 | 孟鑫材料 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 招收0805(材料)調(diào)劑 +3 | 18595523086 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大,材料專碩317求調(diào)劑 +5 | lx8568 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +9 | 小羊小羊_ 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +9 | Koxui 2026-03-12 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑(食品/專碩) +3 | xc321 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|