| 查看: 2818 | 回復(fù): 15 | |||
kiger銅蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
審稿人說可以重投,而編輯直接拒稿,怎么辦?
|
||
|
兩個(gè)月前投了一篇論文到本學(xué)科頂級(jí)的期刊EPSL,今天收到意見,兩個(gè)審稿人的大概意見如下: Reviewer 1: As such I recommend that the paper be rejected at this time, but would encourage the authors to resubmit once the above concerns are addressed. Reviewer 2: I regret to recommend that this manuscript be rejected by EPSL in its present form but I suggest that the authors be encouraged to re-submit their work. I stay available to the authors and to the editor should you have questions about that review. 而編輯意見如下: Reviewers' comments on your work have now been received. You will see that they are advising against publication of your work. I am sorry for this outcome and hope you will find the reviews useful for your future submission to another journal. For your guidance, I append the reviewers' comments below. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to consider your work. 我的理解是,編輯想直接拒稿,不歡迎重新投稿,希望投往其他雜志。但是,審稿人的意見都是給的重投,我本人也傾向于認(rèn)真修改后重投,大家給個(gè)意見,是否可以重投? |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (正式寫手)

至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
木蟲 (文學(xué)泰斗)

至尊木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
超級(jí)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
No gains, no pains.
![]() |
專家經(jīng)驗(yàn): +21105 |
|
銅蟲 (小有名氣)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|