 |
 |
 |
| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
- >論壇更新日志 (4548)
- >導(dǎo)師招生 (937)
- >考研 (936)
- >文獻(xiàn)求助 (238)
- >蟲(chóng)友互識(shí) (145)
- >考博 (117)
- >論文投稿 (107)
- >基金申請(qǐng) (85)
- >碩博家園 (79)
- >招聘信息布告欄 (71)
- >休閑灌水 (69)
- >論文道賀祈福 (43)
- >博后之家 (40)
- >教師之家 (22)
- >公派出國(guó) (21)
- >外文書(shū)籍求助 (16)
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1128 | 回復(fù): 4 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
lavender_12新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[求助]
求助：審稿人的問(wèn)題該如何回答？ 已有3人參與
|
|
|
審稿人是這么問(wèn)的： Q1: In the final paragraph of the introduction, it is stated that "the influence of hydrogen ions" as one of the main parameters will be discussed, but, such an issue was not addressed in the text. 我是這么回答的 A1: We agree with the reviewer's comments. We listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters; however, it is not acceptable for inclusion in the manuscript. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 我的回答是否合適？ |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
一志愿 西北大學(xué) ，070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩，總分287，雙非一本，求調(diào)劑。
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
0856求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
一志愿 南京郵電大學(xué) 288分 材料考研 求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工（085600）296求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
275求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
274求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
-
總分293求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
-
北科281學(xué)碩材料求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
-
尋找調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 急求投稿時(shí)這樣的問(wèn)題應(yīng)該怎樣回答？
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 文章大修，審稿人問(wèn)題比較尖銳
已經(jīng)有31人回復(fù)
- 文章的審稿意見(jiàn)回來(lái)了，覺(jué)得審稿人意見(jiàn)有問(wèn)題，想寫(xiě)argue，請(qǐng)教怎么寫(xiě)argue
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見(jiàn)不好回答的問(wèn)題該如何解釋?zhuān)壳蠼?jīng)驗(yàn)！
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 審稿人意見(jiàn)如何答復(fù)！
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 如何回復(fù)審稿人意見(jiàn)
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
- 主編回復(fù)小修接收，但是沒(méi)有發(fā)審稿人的意見(jiàn)，該如何辦？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 如果確實(shí)沒(méi)有條件補(bǔ)實(shí)驗(yàn)，該怎么回答審稿人合適？
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 怎樣回答審稿人的問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 審稿人的問(wèn)題需要都回答嗎
已經(jīng)有42人回復(fù)
- 語(yǔ)言方面的問(wèn)題，如何回復(fù)審稿人？
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- 審稿人提的問(wèn)題太大，解決不了，如何回復(fù)審稿人？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 如何回復(fù)審稿人的意見(jiàn)
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 如何回答審稿人問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 不知道怎么回答審稿人的問(wèn)題，求助大家,(關(guān)于分子篩MCM-41的）
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 高分求助：如何給編輯寫(xiě)email駁斥審稿人的審稿意見(jiàn)
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 如何回答審稿人的這個(gè)問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 審稿人沒(méi)有大問(wèn)題，就是對(duì)我的一個(gè)方法產(chǎn)生懷疑，怎么解釋?zhuān)?/a>
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 關(guān)于推薦審稿人的一個(gè)問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
- 急急急�。�！求助各位蟲(chóng)友，如何回答審稿人補(bǔ)充實(shí)驗(yàn)的問(wèn)題
已經(jīng)有28人回復(fù)
- 重金求助如何回答審稿人提出的改投它刊的建議
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 怎么回復(fù)審稿人？
已經(jīng)有16人回復(fù)
- 審稿人意見(jiàn)求助，怎么回答呢
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)教如何回答這個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
自私的貓1988
榮譽(yù)版主 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 4800 (副教授)
- 貴賓: 6.746
- 金幣: 50040.4
- 散金: 11517
- 紅花: 256
- 沙發(fā): 134
- 帖子: 11684
- 在線: 1473.7小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 2004083
- 注冊(cè): 2012-09-16
- 性別: GG
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 有機(jī)分子功能材料化學(xué)
- 管轄: 論文投稿
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★ ★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
lavender_12: 金幣+4, ★★★很有幫助, We had listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters in the original manuscript; and this part of the influence of hydrogen ions was deleted when we revised the paper, since it is not necessary to include the effect of hydrogen ions in the manuscript. However, we missed to delete "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction because of our carelessness. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 2015-01-17 16:48:58
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
lavender_12: 金幣+4, ★★★很有幫助, We had listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters in the original manuscript; and this part of the influence of hydrogen ions was deleted when we revised the paper, since it is not necessary to include the effect of hydrogen ions in the manuscript. However, we missed to delete "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction because of our carelessness. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 2015-01-17 16:48:58
|
We agree with the reviewer's comments. We listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters; however, it is not acceptable for inclusion in the manuscript. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed. The revision is highlighted on page 3. ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————— We agreed with the reviewer's comments. The hydrogen ions was listed as one of the main parameters surely. However, with respect to the manuscript, it was a dispensable part. Therefore, we deleted the part of the influence of hydrogen ions. Deleting "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction was missed(這句話沒(méi)看懂，可以去掉吧). The revision was highlighted on page 3. |
4樓2015-01-17 14:20:10
yiranyiqiong
銀蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 231 (大學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 500.7
- 散金: 400
- 紅花: 6
- 帖子: 826
- 在線: 66小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 3569905
- 注冊(cè): 2014-12-01
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 環(huán)境工程
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
★ ★ ★
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
lavender_12: 金幣+3 2015-01-17 16:49:27
感謝參與，應(yīng)助指數(shù) +1
lavender_12: 金幣+3 2015-01-17 16:49:27
|
你可以簡(jiǎn)要說(shuō)明這是可能因素，在后期實(shí)驗(yàn)或者插入?yún)⒖嘉墨I(xiàn)指出，點(diǎn)到即可，而不是簡(jiǎn)要?jiǎng)h除這個(gè)問(wèn)題，能提出一個(gè)小問(wèn)題也是很好的，畢竟大家都會(huì)認(rèn)同這個(gè)觀點(diǎn) [ 發(fā)自手機(jī)版 http://www.gaoyang168.com/3g ] |
2樓2015-01-16 23:12:02
3樓2015-01-17 08:17:29
lavender_12
新蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 11 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 6.6
- 散金: 72
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 407
- 在線: 267.6小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 1054230
- 注冊(cè): 2010-07-08
- 性別: MM
- 專(zhuān)業(yè): 環(huán)境污染化學(xué)
送紅花一朵 |
We had listed hydrogen ions as one of the main parameters in the original manuscript; and this part of the influence of hydrogen ions was deleted when we revised the paper, since it is not necessary to include the effect of hydrogen ions in the manuscript. However, we missed to delete "hydrogen ions" in the final paragraph of the introduction because of our carelessness. The revision is highlighted on page 3. 請(qǐng)您幫我看下，我的回答還有沒(méi)有不合適的地方。dispensable和not necessary用哪個(gè)更合適？另外你沒(méi)看懂的那句意思是由于我的疏忽，我忘記了刪除"hydrogen ions"。 |
5樓2015-01-17 16:54:35
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
