 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 3 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1555 | 回復(fù): 2 | ||
aistar新蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
|
[求助]
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors 怎么弄？ 已有2人參與
|
|
小弟投在springer上的Environmental Science and Pollution Research期刊的一篇文章，最近大修后，編輯來(lái)信說(shuō)Ethical Statement(s) missing。查閱 Instructions for Authors，發(fā)現(xiàn)Ethical Responsibilities of Authors那一欄始終打不開(kāi)，換了幾臺(tái)電腦也不行，不知怎么回事。所以現(xiàn)在不知道這個(gè)Ethical Responsibilities of Authors 怎么弄，是附在文章后面，還是附在回信里，或者單獨(dú)上傳一份Ethical Statement。但是也沒(méi)有在submission里看到上傳Ethical Statement的地方。請(qǐng)有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的前輩指點(diǎn)下，若是能替我打開(kāi)Instructions for Authors里Ethical Responsibilities of Authors那一欄，將雜志要求發(fā)回更好了，在此先謝過(guò)！ Instructions for Authors的地址是：http://www.springer.com/environment/journal/11356?detailsPage=pltci_1060392 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
材料求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大總分298分，前三科223分
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
085600 286分 材料求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
086502化學(xué)工程342求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
材料求調(diào)劑一志愿哈工大324
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
328求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
-
340求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑推薦 材料 304
已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
-
291求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
-
331環(huán)境科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 求助：Journal of Signal Processing Systems的格式要求
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 英文文章投稿格式
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- Environmental science and pollution research有人投過(guò)嗎？
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 還是通信作者的問(wèn)題，有沒(méi)有人知道這個(gè)到底有多重要啊？
已經(jīng)有44人回復(fù)
niefeng168
木蟲(chóng) (初入文壇)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 4223
- 帖子: 15
- 在線: 380.8小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 449286
- 注冊(cè): 2007-11-02
- 專業(yè): 環(huán)境污染化學(xué)
2樓2015-02-13 10:06:33
yzc2
鐵桿木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 9 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 7478.9
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 523
- 在線: 1061.2小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 156456
- 注冊(cè): 2006-01-05
- 專業(yè): 信息處理方法與技術(shù)
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
|
http://www.springer.com/environm ... sPage=pltci_1060392 你提到的“Instructions for Authors里Ethical Responsibilities of Authors”，打開(kāi)如下： This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct. Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal, the professionalism of scientific authorship, and ultimately the entire scientific endeavour. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which include: The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration. The manuscript has not been published previously (partly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work (please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”)). A single study is not split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (e.g. “salami-publishing”). No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support your conclusions No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the author’s own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given (this includes material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased), quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions are secured for material that is copyrighted. Important note: the journal may use software to screen for plagiarism. Consent to submit has been received explicitly from all co-authors, as well as from the responsible authorities - tacitly or explicitly - at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted. Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and therefore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results. In addition: Changes of authorship or in the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Requesting to add or delete authors at revision stage, proof stage, or after publication is a serious matter and may be considered when justifiably warranted. Justification for changes in authorship must be compelling and may be considered only after receipt of written approval from all authors and a convincing, detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. In case of changes at revision stage, a letter must accompany the revised manuscript. In case of changes after acceptance or publication, the request and documentation must be sent via the Publisher to the Editor-in-Chief. In all cases, further documentation may be required to support your request. The decision on accepting the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal and may be turned down. Therefore authors are strongly advised to ensure the correct author group, corresponding author, and order of authors at submission. Upon request authors should be prepared to send relevant documentation or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of raw data, samples, records, etc. If there is a suspicion of misconduct, the journal will carry out an investigation following the COPE guidelines. If, after investigation, the allegation seems to raise valid concerns, the accused author will be contacted and given an opportunity to address the issue. If misconduct has been established beyond reasonable doubt, this may result in the Editor-in-Chief’s implementation of the following measures, including, but not limited to: If the article is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction, either an erratum will be placed with the article or in severe cases complete retraction of the article will occur. The reason must be given in the published erratum or retraction note. The author’s institution may be informed. |
3樓2015-02-13 18:44:19
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 aistar 的主題更新
| 3 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 086502化學(xué)工程342求調(diào)劑 +4 | 阿姨復(fù)古不過(guò) 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +4 | hanamiko 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 320分，材料與化工專業(yè)，求調(diào)劑 +6 | 一定上岸aaa 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 272求調(diào)劑 +7 | 腳滑的守法公民 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 舊吢 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小懶蟲(chóng)不懶了 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211，335分，0856，求調(diào)劑院校和導(dǎo)師 +4 | 傾____蕭 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600，310分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +6 | wasdssaa 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +3 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 334分 一志愿武理 材料求調(diào)劑 +4 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 086000生物與醫(yī)藥292求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小小陳小小 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 081700 調(diào)劑 267分 +11 | 迷人的哈哈 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)調(diào)劑一志愿上海交通大學(xué)336分-本科上海211 +4 | 小魚(yú)愛(ài)有機(jī) 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈工大，085400，320，求調(diào)劑 +4 | gdlf9999 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航材料專317分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 炸呀炸呀炸薯?xiàng)l 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | ALULU4408 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +4 | LHHL66 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|