 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 3824 | 回復(fù): 27 | |||
[交流]
論文被拒，還有希望嗎 已有10人參與
|
|||
 Enclosed are the reviews for your manuscript. Unfortunately, on the basis of the reviewers’ comments and my own careful study of your manuscript, I have decided that your manuscript is not acceptable for publication in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. The main reason for this decision is a serious lack in clarity of the presentation, and a lack of a typical structure to be expected for a scientific manuscript. We receive far more papers than can be published and we must make decisions based on likely scientific impact and interest to our readership. Sincerely, |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
08工學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
-
340求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
311求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
0805 316求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
食品專碩 一志愿雙一流 328
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
材料調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
300分，材料，求調(diào)劑，英一數(shù)二
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
求調(diào)劑，一志愿:南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ，080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩，總分289分
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
085600材料與化工調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工考研調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 小論文外審一天就完成了？被拒的可能性高嗎？
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 文章總是沒有送審就被拒
已經(jīng)有25人回復(fù)
- JMCA被拒，請問有什么雜志可以轉(zhuǎn)投？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- IET論文被拒了，該如何是好
已經(jīng)有25人回復(fù)
- 國內(nèi)會議論文被拒的可能性？
已經(jīng)有27人回復(fù)
- 求助大家，論文因為查重復(fù)率被拒，修改后，還有申述的機(jī)會嗎？
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 投稿被拒多次了，給點建議好嗎
已經(jīng)有22人回復(fù)
- 論文被拒，求幫忙看看拒稿意見
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 編輯給了婉拒的paper還有大修接收的希望嗎
已經(jīng)有21人回復(fù)
- 以缺乏創(chuàng)新性被拒的稿件還有投出去的希望嗎
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 請問JMCA修改稿被拒，加數(shù)據(jù)重寫后再投還有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有37人回復(fù)
- 論文兩個審稿人讓小修，一個審稿人拒絕，結(jié)果編輯拒稿了，這種情況還有希望嗎？
已經(jīng)有41人回復(fù)
- 投稿被拒 能否修改后繼續(xù)投同一個
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 請教---- 論文大修后還有可能被拒嗎？？？
已經(jīng)有32人回復(fù)
- 論文被拒，但編輯說按審稿人的意見修改后再重新提交還是有可能會接受
已經(jīng)有25人回復(fù)
- 論文被拒了，是修改后重投還是另外投一個期刊？
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 文章被拒后重投，被拒的幾率是不是更大？
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 第一次投稿被拒了，大家?guī)臀铱纯催�有沒有希望修改后重投。謝謝�。。。�！
已經(jīng)有10人回復(fù)
- 論文被拒 修改之后可不可以再投原雜志
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
- 文章初審就被拒了。。。
已經(jīng)有74人回復(fù)
- SCI論文從入門到精通（第一版）
已經(jīng)有93人回復(fù)
thanwen
金蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 43 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 1741.6
- 紅花: 4
- 帖子: 222
- 在線: 146.9小時
- 蟲號: 1730696
- 注冊: 2012-04-01
- 專業(yè): 生物技術(shù)藥物
|
直白點說，寫作質(zhì)量太爛了。。 如果沒有經(jīng)過徹徹底底地大修乃至重寫的話，重投沒有意義，還會讓編輯反感，所以先別想接下來是否重投，或者投哪兒。先把文章改好，再想其它的！ 把審稿人的意義仔細(xì)梳理一遍，把其中的實驗、技術(shù)部分整理出來，把這部分問題搞清楚，該補實驗的補實驗。 等所有實驗性的問題都解決后，再把文章重新寫一遍（可在原來的基礎(chǔ)上）。審稿人已經(jīng)給你提出了很多寫作上的問題，這些都要改正，否則寫作水平太差的話，實驗再漂亮人家也不要。寫的時候一定要參照別人有水平的文章，看別人是怎么寫的、怎么布局的，同時要向有經(jīng)驗的老師、同學(xué)多多請教，寫完之后再一遍一遍閱讀，看是否通順，是否有邏輯。 自己寫完之后，再把文章給老師、同學(xué)修改，不要嫌別人水平差，三人行必有我?guī)�，有些問題自己是看不出來的。 最后，視乎文章質(zhì)量看看投哪個雜志。JAFC作為農(nóng)業(yè)食品類的一區(qū)雜志，要求確實比較高，不行的話也可以考慮其它的一些食品類雜志。 |
9樓2015-05-15 02:16:43
匿名
用戶注銷 (文壇精英)
- 應(yīng)助: 47 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 21166.2
- 紅花: 18
- 沙發(fā): 5
- 帖子: 20161
- 在線: 728.2小時
- 蟲號: 0
- 注冊: 2015-02-19
- 專業(yè): 物理有機(jī)化學(xué)
2樓2015-05-14 23:13:44
3樓2015-05-14 23:36:52
xiejf
專家顧問 (文學(xué)泰斗)
麥麥爸爸愛小牛
-
專家經(jīng)驗: +509 - 應(yīng)助: 2943 (講師)
- 貴賓: 2.534
- 金幣: 109942
- 散金: 58010
- 紅花: 693
- 沙發(fā): 2
- 帖子: 84684
- 在線: 3387.6小時
- 蟲號: 1003879
- 注冊: 2010-04-23
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 固體無機(jī)化學(xué)
- 管轄: 復(fù)合材料
4樓2015-05-14 23:42:39
小螞蟻蟲
木蟲 (著名寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 36 (小學(xué)生)
- 金幣: 3331.1
- 散金: 500
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 1081
- 在線: 175.9小時
- 蟲號: 1828283
- 注冊: 2012-05-21
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 細(xì)胞信號轉(zhuǎn)導(dǎo)
5樓2015-05-14 23:58:24
ssssllllnnnn 
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
Translator and Proofreader
- 應(yīng)助: 452 (碩士)
- 金幣: 31580.9
- 紅花: 100
- 帖子: 7681
- 在線: 19966.6小時
- 蟲號: 3328089
- 注冊: 2014-07-17
- 專業(yè): 腫瘤發(fā)生
6樓2015-05-15 00:00:17
|
Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Do not publish. Comments: The paper shows serious problems in any part and this demonstrates lack of education in writing a scientific paper: • most sentences of “Results” paragraph should have been included in “Introduction”. • several references do not include what the authors report and I suspect they did not read it. • most references are very dated. • some acronyms are not defined (e.g. NLs, PLs, MCFA, AA, DHA) or wrong (line 215: C18:2n9cnt instead of C18:2 conj) • two softwares were applied (lines 161-163) just to calculate mean and standard deviation • the indications of company producing columns and apparatus are absent or not complete. • for the human milk samples analysed, the terms “colostrum” and “milk” are used without distinction. • several sentences and conclusions are repeated more and more times, are often meaningless, state the obvious and are not worthy to appear in a scientific paper. Below are reported some examples o lines 67-68 - This sentence is exactly the same as lines 71-73 o lines 388-403 These lines report sentences already written in the text. o reference 25 is the same as reference 6 o line 85 – Really the Chinese mothers have 1 week of gestation ? o lines 256-257 : “This may suggest that in human body there isn’t a ruminant stomach with ruminant bacteria which.......” This can be really suggested on the basis of the results of this research??? o lines 258- 260: “Studies of the branched chain fatty acids in ruminant milk fat are a little bit more, which may be due to the fact that its commercialization is far higher than that of human milk” . Is the human milk commercialized in China? Well I never! For all the above-mentioned reasons, the reading and the evaluation of the results is very difficult. Nevertheless, trying to overlook also the high number of English mistakes, the paper seemed to me not to provide any new and interesting contribution, particularly with respect to milk fat composition. Originality: Poor Technical Quality: Fair Clarity of Presentation: Poor Importance to Field: Poor Reviewer: 2 Comments: ABSTRACT: Ln 21-23. Sentence „ Rumen microorganizm…” is general information not resulting from the research. The abstract should include information summarizing the results of the presented research. INTRODUCTION Ln 34-35. Giving specific results, the author of the research must be given. Ln 46-50. The statements are not related to the topic of the manuscript. Recalling of bacterial synthesis of BCFA in the introduction, the results of other studies must be quote (cite research). It should be emphasized that content of BCFA in cow’s milk fat from affects feeding system (e.g. conventional vs. organic, or the possibility of nutritional supplementation). Referring also to the effect of the milk rich in BCFA on human’s health. Results of a study on the topic of healthy properties BCFA (e.g. 13-MTD) can be cited. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ln 83-91. Lack of correlation between research colostrum/milk of women and the sample taken from the cow and goat (sampling for testing without linking to each other). In order to work (Line 79-81) assessment of the relationship is impossible. Further compared with composition of women’s colostrum/milk in 1 week of gestation, while not specified phase of lactation in ruminants and number of samples taken. Ln 161. There is no known number of samples taken of milk cows and goats, with 3 repetition it is difficult to talk about statistical analysis. It is a kind of monitoring of selected FA concentration. The instrumental methods are acceptable RESULT AND DISCUSSION This section is too extensive, the discussion should be more specific, recent researches must be cited. All abbreviations should be explained.LN 186. W mleku wykryto ponad 400 FA. Ln 190-191. Giving values, researches must be invoke on other researched. Ln 194-205.In this study a number of PUFA (table 4) is not determined, why then the discussion about their content in milk. Ln 209. Absorbet? Ln 220. Human milk contains more than 6% trans fatty acids (dominant content TVA). 228-229. It requires consideration of the latest research. Explain „…in human milk are derived from bacteria?”. LN 241. Variation in the composition are obvious. In studies relationship is not correlated, lack of consistency between the composition of fish oil and human milk (found only differences). LN 260-261. The statements must be supported by references, and mechanisms explained precisely. LN 302. (paragraph 295) The results of BCFA content in milk were discussed previously and now with Table 2. No chronology LN 295-320. The research of other authors should be invoke by giving findings, directions of influence. LN 332-362. The results are already given in the table, no need to be excessively repeated. No items of discussion. LN 389. In the present study has not been proven that human body is partly synthesized by bacteria like in ruminant…?. LN 388- 399. The summary should refer to the results of research of its own. LITERATURE CITED Some (mostly) older researches must be removed and new research must be added. Technical Quality: Fair Clarity of Presentation: Fair Reviewer: 3 Comments: BCFA are present in low quantities in food but they may be bioactive molecules which makes it necessary to investigate their role in the diet and in humans. While data on BCFA content in human milk and food has been collected in the past, little information was available on the positional distribution of BCFAs in triacylglycerides. Due to some missing method information and some deficits in the structure of the manuscript, a major revision is required before the ms can be considered for publication. Details are listed below. Major points: Especially the first part of R&D (lines 165-320) is too long and needs to be condensed (see following points). As stated by the authors, the quantification of fatty acids is based on the GC/MS-SIM method of Thurnhofer et al. Therefore, most information listed in line 165-184 is acturally not new and must not be discussed in this chapter. Instead, a brief description may be added to the quantification mode in section Materials and Methods. Much of the text l. 185-232 is repeating literature findings. General findings in the literature should be reported in the introduction and not in section R&D. In the results section, the authors should focus on their own findings and discuss them directly with literature data. For this reason, discussions on trans-fatty acids do not fit into this section because they are not part of the study. Levels of BCFA should be compared and discussed with those in the literature including those reported in reference 12. This paper lists of BCFAs in human milk and similar papers as those chosen in the present study. The number of samples is too low to verify statements such as those in line 256ff. Please avoid extensive discussion of data where it is not covered by the findings of the study (either due to a too low statistic number of samples or data which is not subject of the study (see also next point). China is a big country and it is hard to imagine that the selected ten colostrum samples are representative for China. Likewise, the eating habits were not presented. Therefore, generalizing statements are not justified (line 270ff). The part with the sn-2 positions is the really innovative section of the ms. This method and its validation is only briefly shown. Please provide a better quantitative description how bands in TLC were visualized, how clear the spots were (a photograph of a plate may be added to the Supporting Information) and how reproducible the results. As far as I know. pancreatic lipase (please provide source) only cleaves FAs until C20, which can become a significant problem with fish. Please check and provide validation data. Figures and Tables: The number of illustrative items is quite high and the authors should try to reduce it. For instance, Table 1 can be moved to the supporting information section. Figures 2 and 3, and maybe others, might be merged using a,b style. Minor comments: Language: understandable but some points should be revised All abbreviations need to be introduced (see abstract and later on). Please be consistent and uniform: use on term exclusively for abbreviations (see anteiso-C17:0 versus anteiso-17:0; sn-2 vs. Sn-2 and so on; Some special characters were misprinted in the PDF(e.g. line 90, 108) – please check the PDF upon submission Check for subscript (superscript): H2O (line 124), BF3 (line 130) aso. Add references for statements in line 250, line 272 Line 232: phytanic acid and probably pristanic acid Table 2: n=10 is only given for colostrum or also for cow and goat milk. This is not clearly defined in the experimental part. Likewise, please provide fat content of the milks (whole milk? Defatted milk?) Clarity of Presentation: Fair Reviewer: 4 Comments: The whole manuscript should be revised and re-written because so many sentences have no sense, some of them are too short, connectives are lack, and the English must be revised by a native-speaker. As examples: - 1st paragraph of introduction (lines 29-35): there are 3 sentences beginning with "human milk" instead of using connectives. - The abbreviation BCFA is introduced in line 41 but it is not used sometimes throughout the manuscript (lines 49, 65, ...). - Revise degrees Celsius symbol (lines 90, 91, 108, ..). - Table 3: include the units. - Table 4 and 6: Increase font size. - References should be updated for BCFA topic (check for Egge's articles) and for generalities. Technical Quality: Fair Clarity of Presentation: Poor |
7樓2015-05-15 00:30:06
ssssllllnnnn
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
Translator and Proofreader
- 應(yīng)助: 452 (碩士)
- 金幣: 31580.9
- 紅花: 100
- 帖子: 7681
- 在線: 19966.6小時
- 蟲號: 3328089
- 注冊: 2014-07-17
- 專業(yè): 腫瘤發(fā)生
8樓2015-05-15 00:54:12
老莊_cool
新蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1265.4
- 散金: 2100
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 227
- 在線: 30.4小時
- 蟲號: 1999106
- 注冊: 2012-09-13
- 專業(yè): 食品科學(xué)基礎(chǔ)
10樓2015-05-15 10:25:13
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 yanyy 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +8 | A-哆啦Z夢 2026-03-23 | 13/650 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 306求0703調(diào)劑一志愿華中師范 +10 | 紙魚ly 2026-03-21 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | zzzzfan 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑，跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 305分求調(diào)劑（食品工程） +5 | Sxy112 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【雙一流院校新能源、環(huán)境材料，材料加工與模擬招收大量調(diào)劑】 +4 | Higraduate 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +3 | desto 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +10 | Zhao anqi 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300，一志愿北航320求調(diào)劑 +3 | Jerry0216 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 280分求調(diào)劑 一志愿085802 +4 | PUMPT 2026-03-22 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 石河子大學(xué)（211、雙一流）碩博研究生長期招生公告 +3 | 李子目 2026-03-22 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +11 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | 余意卿 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調(diào)劑 +3 | 鳳凰院丁真 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 南昌大學(xué)材料專碩311分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 77chaselx 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085700資源與環(huán)境308求調(diào)劑 +12 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 13/650 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 294求調(diào)劑材料與化工專碩 +15 | 陌の森林 2026-03-18 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[考研] A區(qū)線材料學(xué)調(diào)劑 +5 | 周周無極 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ，080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|