| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 6948 | 回復(fù): 18 | |||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||||
linlufen424新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
大修被編輯秒拒,已經(jīng)按照審稿人的意見認(rèn)真修改了,是否應(yīng)該申訴? 已有17人參與
|
||||
|
LZ之前投STARCH,一個(gè)月以后回來的意見是大修,三個(gè)審稿人的意見都不多,一個(gè)是認(rèn)為要further discuss, 一個(gè)說interesting,沒提意見,還有一個(gè)說要minor revision. Reviewer: 1 Comments to the Author Why not use the Statistica program for analysis of resulados? Figure 1 only shows the results before the microwave treatment. Where are the results after the microwave treatment? The results were not enough compared to the results in the literature. It is necessary to further discussion. Reviewer: 2 Comments to the Author This article addresses factors commenting relationship between radical generation and microwave irradiation for various types of rice flour. The subject is not a new but analysis is interesting and within the scope of the Starch Journal. Reviewer: 3 Comments to the Author Dear Editor, The manuscript has been reviewed precisely. The hidden hazards of Microwave are since several years in the centre of interest. Therefore efforts to proving the truth are welcome. The study has been designed thoughtful and contains some useful data, thus this article is deserved to be published in STARCH after minor corrections. The followings must be taken into consideration: - Radical generation mechanism as well as radical generation and losses kinetics must be included in text. LZ按照審稿人的意見補(bǔ)了實(shí)驗(yàn),補(bǔ)充了discussion,還用SPSS處理了數(shù)據(jù),害怕時(shí)間拖太長(zhǎng),三周后就提交了修改稿和response letter.然而提交以后兩天內(nèi)就收到了編輯的拒信,理由只有一句話,而且完全沒有審稿人的意見。 Dear Author(s), I regret to inform you that your manuscript star.201500106.R1 has not been accepted for publication in Starch. The English and content of this paper has not been improved sufficiently for publication and therefore is rejected. Please note that this decision is final. Where review/further review was sought for the decision, the reviewers' comments are included at the end of this letter. Hopefully this will not deter you from making new submissions in the future. Yours faithfully, Prof. Richard Tester Editor Referee(s)' Comments to Author: 看到拒信頓時(shí)心涼了半截,辛辛苦苦修改的文章就這么莫名其妙被拒了。實(shí)在是想不明白。導(dǎo)師也很氣憤,建議我給編輯發(fā)郵件詢問原因,說明自己已經(jīng)認(rèn)真修改的情況。求助大家,請(qǐng)問發(fā)這封郵件有必要嗎?如有必要,需要怎么說呢? 現(xiàn)在真的很絕望,希望能得到大家的意見,謝謝大家~ |
論文投稿交流的收集 | 投稿 |
新蟲 (正式寫手)

金蟲 (小有名氣)
金蟲 (著名寫手)

新蟲 (正式寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 南昌大學(xué)材料專碩311分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 77chaselx 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專業(yè)(081702)315分求調(diào)劑 +12 | yangfz 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +3 | Jack?k?y 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調(diào)劑 +9 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專業(yè)求調(diào)劑 +6 | hanamiko 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿蘇州大學(xué)材料求調(diào)劑,總分315(英一) +5 | sbdksD 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +12 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-19 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 本人考085602 化學(xué)工程 專碩 +19 | 不知道叫什么! 2026-03-15 | 21/1050 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Mqqqqqq 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0817 化學(xué)工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章 +22 | rare12345 2026-03-18 | 22/1100 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國(guó)海洋大學(xué),生物學(xué),301分,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1孫悟空 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +4 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑 +15 | 大米飯! 2026-03-15 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 334求調(diào)劑 +3 | 志存高遠(yuǎn)意在機(jī)?/a> 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 有沒有大佬發(fā)小論文能帶我個(gè)二作 +3 | 增銳漏人 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 文思客 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 諾貝爾化學(xué)獎(jiǎng)覬?/a> 2026-03-15 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +5 | 大米飯! 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 080500,材料學(xué)碩302分求調(diào)劑學(xué)校 +4 | 初識(shí)可樂 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|