| 2 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1170 | 回復(fù): 1 | |||
[交流]
11月18號(hào)投稿,12月2號(hào)收到大修意見,審稿人只有兩個(gè)意見,正常嗎? 已有1人參與
|
|
稿子被三連拒,第四次投稿,上個(gè)月18號(hào)投的(11.18),今天就收到郵件了,這比我預(yù)期的審稿周期提前了好幾個(gè)月……郵件部分內(nèi)容如下: Dear Dr. Wang, We have received the reports from our reviewers on your manuscript, "XXXX", which you submitted to Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. Based on the advice received, I feel that your manuscript could be reconsidered for publication . When preparing your revised manuscript, you are asked to carefully consider the reviewer comments which are attached, and submit a list of responses to the comments. Please refer to the comments and suggestions of the reviewers and incorporate the modifications into the text using a different color. Please also submit your response as separate submission item. 以上應(yīng)該是編輯的話。 下面是審稿人的: Reviewer #1: After to do a careful review of this paper, my comments are: The paper is too long, and hard to read and understand. I recommend to the authors, be more careful in the measurement procedure and calibration of the equipment, and in the certification on the found values, in order to get reliable real values, supported scientifically. Because these values will be published and used as reference for other authors, for dose calculation and health risk. The calibration of the instrument should be in the same conditions as the radon measurements. About the gamma measurements, the authors show a very poor measurement protocol, and no values certification with international standards. The calibration of the instrument should be in the same conditions as the measurements. After these corrections, the paper can be accept, because this topic is very important, and will help to understand the geologic distribution of Uranium, and the radon emanation in the region. 我覺得文章內(nèi)容有欠缺的地方全部沒提,只是嫌我文章太長(zhǎng)了,不好讀懂(這個(gè)應(yīng)該是需要潤(rùn)色了);然后質(zhì)疑測(cè)量的結(jié)果可信度,這種審稿意見我導(dǎo)師都是醉了,表示沒有辦法回復(fù)。 麻煩各位蟲友幫忙看看,這樣的修改意見,希望大不大呢? |
捐助貴賓 (正式寫手)
|
應(yīng)該是語(yǔ)言還有問題 第一次投plos one,plos 讓我去aje潤(rùn)色 網(wǎng)址 https://www.aje.com/c/WQP69 3000元 高級(jí)潤(rùn)色6000 words,后來(lái)這個(gè)文章大修小修各一次,aje也一直幫我潤(rùn)色到發(fā)表。。。 確實(shí)是美國(guó)人潤(rùn)色的,這個(gè)aje在中國(guó)沒有機(jī)構(gòu)都,而且據(jù)我所知,nature communication, plos 系列,bmc系列都是直接推薦潤(rùn)色到aje的。 我潤(rùn)色了6篇了已經(jīng),5篇已經(jīng)發(fā)表了,沒在有語(yǔ)言問題。 |

| 2 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑(0805) +4 | 煙汐憶海 2026-03-16 | 11/550 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 收復(fù)試調(diào)劑生 +3 | 雨后秋荷 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 280求調(diào)劑 +6 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +6 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 301求調(diào)劑 +9 | yy要上岸呀 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 被我言中:新模板不強(qiáng)調(diào)格式了,假專家開始管格式了 +4 | beefly 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 277調(diào)劑 +5 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +9 | 負(fù)心者當(dāng)誅 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩274一志愿211求調(diào)劑 +6 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 278求調(diào)劑 +3 | Yy7400 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)]
今年的國(guó)基金是打分制嗎?
50+3
|
zhanghaozhu 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑,求各位老師收留 +8 | 秋有木北 2026-03-14 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工一志愿南昌大學(xué)327求調(diào)劑推薦 +7 | Ncdx123456 2026-03-13 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 22408總分284求調(diào)劑 +3 | InAspic 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +4 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 310求調(diào)劑 +3 | 【上上簽】 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)考研312分調(diào)劑 +3 | T123 tt 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|