| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2494 | 回復(fù): 5 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者三流作者將贈(zèng)送您 5 個(gè)金幣 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
三流作者金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[求助]
Optical Engineering投稿被拒,兩個(gè)評(píng)審意見相差很大,有必要申訴嗎?
|
|
|
以下為編輯拒稿信: The reviewers of the manuscript you submitted find that, although your work appears to be correct, the specific subject is not appropriate for Optical Engineering. After careful thought, I have decided to follow their recommendation. The reviewers' comments are included below. Perhaps they will be of help in finding a more appropriate journal for your work. I regret having to decline your manuscript. I appreciate the time and effort required to carry out this type of study. 以下為評(píng)審意見: Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: Appropriateness for OE: Good Quality of writing: Good Clarity: Good Conciseness: Satisfactory References to literature: Good Relevance of figures: Good Originality: Good Significance of results: Good Technical accuracy of results: Marginal Rigor: Satisfactory Detail level of procedures: Good Substantiation of conclusions: Satisfactory Reviewer #1 (Reviewer Comments Required): It is quite interesting paper, however I would recommend that you revise conclusion. There are sentences(form and length), which could be generally used in the discussion parts. ……后面提了一些中肯的問題和修改意見 Reviewer #2 Evaluations: Appropriateness for OE: Satisfactory Quality of writing: Satisfactory Clarity: Satisfactory Conciseness: Satisfactory References to literature: Satisfactory Relevance of figures: Poor Originality: Satisfactory Significance of results: Marginal Technical accuracy of results: Satisfactory Rigor: Poor Detail level of procedures: Marginal Substantiation of conclusions: Marginal Reviewer #2 (Reviewer Comments Required): The structure to built a simple and mobile laser scanner is the only strong point of the research. The paper is too poor and the gives few examples to test the accuracy of the new tool. Then is not evaluated so much for mobile purpose and indoor to make a correct comparison with SLAM 。 我論文提到了SLAM,但是第二個(gè)評(píng)審提到的跟slam對(duì)比啥的beyond the scope of our paper,沒提什么跟論文相關(guān)的問題,不知道他有沒有認(rèn)真看一遍論文……可能是我給自己挖了個(gè)坑,送審的時(shí)候送到了做slam的人手里,然而那并不是我的內(nèi)容啊。。。 我給編輯發(fā)了個(gè)申訴信,死馬當(dāng)活馬醫(yī)了,不行就修改重投或改投了,網(wǎng)上之前沒看到過這個(gè)期刊的申訴案例,第一次投外國(guó)期刊,不知道大家有何高見? |

新蟲 (初入文壇)
新蟲 (知名作家)
金蟲 (正式寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料 336 求調(diào)劑 +3 | An@. 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調(diào)劑 +4 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 西北大學(xué) ,070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩,總分287,雙非一本,求調(diào)劑。 +3 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 323求調(diào)劑 +3 | 洼小桶 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿:南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩,總分289分 +4 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料工程348求調(diào)劑 +3 |  ̄^ ̄゜汗 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | Stella_Yao 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學(xué) 學(xué)碩 354求調(diào)劑 +3 | 我想要讀研究生 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 319求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小力氣珂珂 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 ,六級(jí)已過,有科研經(jīng)歷 +13 | 曦熙兮 2026-03-15 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 081700化工學(xué)碩調(diào)劑 +3 | 【1】 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑,英語六級(jí)551,有科研經(jīng)歷 +3 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑,一作一項(xiàng)核心論文五項(xiàng)專利,省、國(guó)級(jí)證書40+數(shù)一英一287 +8 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +5 | 上岸的小葡 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩274一志愿211求調(diào)劑 +6 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +3 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 290分有科研經(jīng)歷,論文在投 +7 | 膩膩gk 2026-03-14 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 拾光任染 2026-03-15 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 0856專碩279求調(diào)劑 +5 | 加油加油!? 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|