| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2503 | 回復(fù): 5 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者三流作者將贈送您 5 個金幣 | ||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||
三流作者金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[求助]
Optical Engineering投稿被拒,兩個評審意見相差很大,有必要申訴嗎?
|
|
|
以下為編輯拒稿信: The reviewers of the manuscript you submitted find that, although your work appears to be correct, the specific subject is not appropriate for Optical Engineering. After careful thought, I have decided to follow their recommendation. The reviewers' comments are included below. Perhaps they will be of help in finding a more appropriate journal for your work. I regret having to decline your manuscript. I appreciate the time and effort required to carry out this type of study. 以下為評審意見: Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: Appropriateness for OE: Good Quality of writing: Good Clarity: Good Conciseness: Satisfactory References to literature: Good Relevance of figures: Good Originality: Good Significance of results: Good Technical accuracy of results: Marginal Rigor: Satisfactory Detail level of procedures: Good Substantiation of conclusions: Satisfactory Reviewer #1 (Reviewer Comments Required): It is quite interesting paper, however I would recommend that you revise conclusion. There are sentences(form and length), which could be generally used in the discussion parts. ……后面提了一些中肯的問題和修改意見 Reviewer #2 Evaluations: Appropriateness for OE: Satisfactory Quality of writing: Satisfactory Clarity: Satisfactory Conciseness: Satisfactory References to literature: Satisfactory Relevance of figures: Poor Originality: Satisfactory Significance of results: Marginal Technical accuracy of results: Satisfactory Rigor: Poor Detail level of procedures: Marginal Substantiation of conclusions: Marginal Reviewer #2 (Reviewer Comments Required): The structure to built a simple and mobile laser scanner is the only strong point of the research. The paper is too poor and the gives few examples to test the accuracy of the new tool. Then is not evaluated so much for mobile purpose and indoor to make a correct comparison with SLAM 。 我論文提到了SLAM,但是第二個評審提到的跟slam對比啥的beyond the scope of our paper,沒提什么跟論文相關(guān)的問題,不知道他有沒有認(rèn)真看一遍論文……可能是我給自己挖了個坑,送審的時候送到了做slam的人手里,然而那并不是我的內(nèi)容啊。。。 我給編輯發(fā)了個申訴信,死馬當(dāng)活馬醫(yī)了,不行就修改重投或改投了,網(wǎng)上之前沒看到過這個期刊的申訴案例,第一次投外國期刊,不知道大家有何高見? |

新蟲 (知名作家)
金蟲 (正式寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +12 | 藍(lán)月亮亮 2026-03-30 | 12/600 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 292分,材料與化工,申請調(diào)劑 +19 | 程晴之 2026-04-01 | 22/1100 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211,335分,0856,求調(diào)劑院校和導(dǎo)師 +14 | 傾____蕭 2026-03-27 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 273求調(diào)劑 +19 | 李芷新1 2026-03-31 | 19/950 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +12 | waltzh 2026-04-01 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 省雙一流重點(diǎn)一本大學(xué)招收調(diào)劑 +4 | wwwwffffff 2026-03-31 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料0856 英一數(shù)二 323 求調(diào)劑 +9 | 袁sy 2026-04-01 | 9/450 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 考研調(diào)劑 +5 | 駱駝男人 2026-04-01 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 348求調(diào)劑 +9 | zzzzyk123 2026-04-01 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 262求調(diào)劑 +9 | 勵志一定發(fā)文章 2026-03-31 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +8 | 三水sss 2026-04-01 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西交大080500材料學(xué)碩349 +6 | jqx1258 2026-03-31 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 生醫(yī)工0831調(diào)劑求推薦 +4 | 小熊睿睿_s 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 本科211生物醫(yī)學(xué)工程085409求調(diào)劑339分 +7 | 里子木yy 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿大連理工大學(xué),機(jī)械工程學(xué)碩,341 +3 | 西瓜田的守望者 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085600 286分 材料求調(diào)劑 +11 | 麻辣魷魚 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 317分 一志愿南理工材料工程 本科湖工大 求調(diào)劑 +12 | 芋泥小鈴鐺 2026-03-28 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑考研 +3 | 王杰一 2026-03-29 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085602 化工專碩 338分 求調(diào)劑 +12 | 路癡小琪 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 292求調(diào)劑 +4 | 求求了收下我吧?/a> 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|