| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2497 | 回復(fù): 5 | ||
| 【懸賞金幣】回答本帖問題,作者三流作者將贈送您 5 個金幣 | ||
三流作者金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[求助]
Optical Engineering投稿被拒,兩個評審意見相差很大,有必要申訴嗎?
|
|
|
以下為編輯拒稿信: The reviewers of the manuscript you submitted find that, although your work appears to be correct, the specific subject is not appropriate for Optical Engineering. After careful thought, I have decided to follow their recommendation. The reviewers' comments are included below. Perhaps they will be of help in finding a more appropriate journal for your work. I regret having to decline your manuscript. I appreciate the time and effort required to carry out this type of study. 以下為評審意見: Reviewer Comments: Reviewer #1 Evaluations: Appropriateness for OE: Good Quality of writing: Good Clarity: Good Conciseness: Satisfactory References to literature: Good Relevance of figures: Good Originality: Good Significance of results: Good Technical accuracy of results: Marginal Rigor: Satisfactory Detail level of procedures: Good Substantiation of conclusions: Satisfactory Reviewer #1 (Reviewer Comments Required): It is quite interesting paper, however I would recommend that you revise conclusion. There are sentences(form and length), which could be generally used in the discussion parts. ……后面提了一些中肯的問題和修改意見 Reviewer #2 Evaluations: Appropriateness for OE: Satisfactory Quality of writing: Satisfactory Clarity: Satisfactory Conciseness: Satisfactory References to literature: Satisfactory Relevance of figures: Poor Originality: Satisfactory Significance of results: Marginal Technical accuracy of results: Satisfactory Rigor: Poor Detail level of procedures: Marginal Substantiation of conclusions: Marginal Reviewer #2 (Reviewer Comments Required): The structure to built a simple and mobile laser scanner is the only strong point of the research. The paper is too poor and the gives few examples to test the accuracy of the new tool. Then is not evaluated so much for mobile purpose and indoor to make a correct comparison with SLAM 。 我論文提到了SLAM,但是第二個評審提到的跟slam對比啥的beyond the scope of our paper,沒提什么跟論文相關(guān)的問題,不知道他有沒有認(rèn)真看一遍論文……可能是我給自己挖了個坑,送審的時候送到了做slam的人手里,然而那并不是我的內(nèi)容啊。。。 我給編輯發(fā)了個申訴信,死馬當(dāng)活馬醫(yī)了,不行就修改重投或改投了,網(wǎng)上之前沒看到過這個期刊的申訴案例,第一次投外國期刊,不知道大家有何高見? |

新蟲 (知名作家)
金蟲 (正式寫手)

金蟲 (正式寫手)

| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué) 305求調(diào)劑 +5 | FY_yy 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境總分308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-20 | 7/350 |
|
|
[基金申請]
學(xué)校已經(jīng)提交到NSFC,還能修改嗎?
40+4
|
babangida 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西安交通大學(xué)材料工程專業(yè) 282分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 楓橋ZL 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +12 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-19 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +9 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 296求調(diào)劑 +6 | www_q 2026-03-18 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武漢理工材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +9 | Doleres 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿:南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩,總分289分 +4 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 295材料求調(diào)劑,一志愿武漢理工085601專碩 +5 | Charlieyq 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南理工085701環(huán)境302求調(diào)劑院校 +3 | 葵梓衛(wèi)隊 2026-03-20 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 工科材料085601 279求調(diào)劑 +7 | 困于星晨 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)調(diào)劑招人!。 +3 | 山海天嵐 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿蘇州大學(xué)材料工程(085601)專碩有科研經(jīng)歷三項國獎兩個實(shí)用型專利一項省級立項 +6 | 大火山小火山 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 淇ya_~ 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] [導(dǎo)師推薦]西南科技大學(xué)國防/材料導(dǎo)師推薦 +3 | 尖角小荷 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 中科院材料273求調(diào)劑 +4 | yzydy 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|