| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 7381 | 回復(fù): 2 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
Math露珠木蟲 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
別人家的論文評(píng)審意見 已有2人參與
|
||
|
來源:https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-288924-953710.html 審稿人什么的最令人討厭了!花費(fèi)數(shù)以周記甚至數(shù)以月計(jì)的時(shí)間,終于把論文寫到自己覺得完美無缺,滿懷希望把論文投遞出去。你心想發(fā)表論文的過程肯定會(huì)非常輕松,仿佛看到自己的論文印成鉛字在你眼前,別做夢(mèng)了! 審稿人會(huì)讓你感到絕望甚至想自殺的,當(dāng)然,如果他們心情好的話,可能只需要你回到電腦前做一下修改。說真的,審稿人提出的那些無關(guān)緊要,毫無意義的問題和評(píng)論到底有什么用? 審稿人跟你的溝通要么熱情誠(chéng)懇,要么鄭重其事,但是審稿人與期刊編輯之間的溝通就隨意多了。你知道審稿人在背著你說你的哪些壞話嗎?請(qǐng)往下看。 2010年Environmental Microbiology雜志刊登了一部分雜志的審稿意見,讓人在學(xué)術(shù)研究嚴(yán)肅、認(rèn)真的前提下充分體會(huì)了下,審稿人的幽默與詼諧,有的審稿意見甚至讓人啼笑皆非,下面列舉了一部分經(jīng)典的審稿意見,讓大家也見識(shí)一下史上最狠的評(píng)審意見,其他的內(nèi)容見文后附件,有興趣的可以繼續(xù)尋找。 PS:翻譯純屬搞笑,不喜勿拍! 毒舌搞笑篇: This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future. 這文章太不給力了…請(qǐng)萬勿發(fā)表。此外,建議鎖定該作者的電子郵件ID,避免此人日后繼續(xù)投稿。。 The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about. 寫作水平和展示的數(shù)據(jù)無敵了,哥不得不提前下班,匆匆回家,然后花時(shí)間思考下人活著是為了蝦米。。。 Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest! 拒發(fā),必須的。本文的漏洞比我爺爺網(wǎng)眼背心上的洞還多! I would suggest that EM set up a fund that pays for the red wine reviewers may need to digest manuscripts like this one. 哥建議貴刊(環(huán)境微生物學(xué)雜志)成立基金,以買單審稿人審閱時(shí)可能需要的紅酒,哥上火呀。 The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style. 這篇文章問題多多,寫作格式尤其可怕,簡(jiǎn)直摧殘了哥身體里求生的意志。 Hopeless – Seems like they have been asleep and are not up on recent work on metagenomics. 哥真的不能淡定了。顯然作者要么睡著了,要么完全沒跟上宏基因組學(xué)的前沿發(fā)展。 A weak paper, poor experimental design, comparison of sequences using different primers, no statistical analysis possible, carelessly written, poorly thought through. 文章很弱。實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)很銼,使用不同的引物序列比較;統(tǒng)計(jì)分析不置可否;寫作粗獷。徹頭徹尾的悲劇呀。。。 I agreed to review this Ms whilst answering e-mails in the golden glow of a balmy evening on the terrace of our holiday hotel on Lake Como. Back in the harsh light of reality in Belfast I realize that it’s just on the limit of my comfort zone and that it would probably have been better not to have volunteered. 迷人的傍晚,金色的夕照,如果此時(shí)哥在科莫湖的假日酒店那鋪灑著余輝的露臺(tái)上,我會(huì)欣然同意審閱這篇文章。然而,在貝爾法斯特殘酷的日光里,我想剛才我那么想是被酒店啥的爽到了,文章么,咱能不提這事行嗎。。。 The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student. 哥從本科開始就不看這種操性的文章了。 The lack of negative controls. . . . results in the authors being lost in the funhouse. Unfortunately, I do not think they even realize this. 陰性對(duì)照實(shí)驗(yàn)的缺乏導(dǎo)致作者在游樂場(chǎng)里完全迷失了,不幸的是,我看他們現(xiàn)在還沒意識(shí)到。 "Season’s Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days." 節(jié)日快樂!回復(fù)慢了,真抱歉。有一只烤鵝妨礙我,讓我?guī)滋於紱]顧得上回郵件。 "This paper is awfully written. There is no adequate objective and no reasonable conclusion. The literature is quoted at random and not in the context of argument. I have doubts about the methods and whether the effort of data gathering is sufficient to arrive at a useful conclusion." 這篇論文寫得太爛了。目的不明確,結(jié)論不合理。引文都是亂引的,跟正文的論證完全對(duì)不上號(hào)。我懷疑這樣的實(shí)驗(yàn)方法,也懷疑他們收集的數(shù)據(jù)不足以得出有效結(jié)論。 見識(shí)過了審稿人的毒舌和幽默,再來見識(shí)一下審稿人怎么夸人。但當(dāng)審稿人遇到非常棒的論文,也會(huì)給出衷心的好評(píng)。 好評(píng)點(diǎn)贊篇: “Very much enjoyed reading this one, and do not have any significant comments. Wish I had thought of this one.” 這篇論文讀起來簡(jiǎn)直是一種享受,沒有任何意見。這么好的點(diǎn)子我當(dāng)初怎么沒想到! “There was little I could think of to improve this nice paper.” 這篇論文好得我都不知道要怎么改了。 "This is as solid a write up as I have seen, many spend much more time and space to say considerably less. It is a perfect example of a compact report." 這是我見過的最確鑿的報(bào)告,許多人花更多時(shí)間精力寫出來的比這個(gè)差多了。作為一篇翔實(shí)的報(bào)告,這是一個(gè)完美的例子。 "landmark paper on P. putida physiology." 假單胞菌生理學(xué)研究的里程碑 "It is always a joy to review manuscripts such as this. Well conceived, well executed, well edited. Clean. Pristine. From start to finish." 評(píng)審這樣的稿件是件人生樂事:構(gòu)思周詳,實(shí)施得當(dāng),寫得漂亮。干凈,純樸,從頭至尾。 以上審稿意見摘自于Referees‘ quotes - 2010. (2010) Environmental Microbiology,還有更多,理文編輯收集了2001年至2011年的每期內(nèi)容,讀起來完全停不下來,越讀越上癮。 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料專碩調(diào)劑 +10 | 椰椰。 2026-03-29 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +5 | Sanmu-124 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)308分調(diào)劑 +7 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +6 | j的立方 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +10 | 張zz111 2026-03-27 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)材料與化工方向336分 +11 | 辰沐5211314 2026-03-26 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 318一志愿吉林大學(xué)生物與醫(yī)藥 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 篤行致遠(yuǎn). 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航 335分 | 0856 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷 +8 | cccchenso 2026-03-29 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 2026年華南師范大學(xué)歡迎化學(xué),化工,生物,生醫(yī)工等專業(yè)優(yōu)秀學(xué)子加入! +3 | llss0711 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +7 | 璞玉~~ 2026-03-25 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 蘆lty 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-314 +3 | LILIQQ 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +10 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-24 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 劉柯@ 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿鄭大085600,310分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 李瀟可 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 341求調(diào)劑 +7 | 青檸檬1 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 中國(guó)科學(xué)院深圳先進(jìn)技術(shù)研究院-光纖傳感課題組招生-中國(guó)科學(xué)院大學(xué)、深圳理工大學(xué)聯(lián)培 +5 | YangTyu1 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 07化學(xué)303求調(diào)劑 +5 | 睿08 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | 李李不服輸 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +7 | 小羊睡著了? 2026-03-23 | 10/500 |
|