| 3 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 7383 | 回復(fù): 2 | |||
Math露珠木蟲(chóng) (知名作家)
|
[交流]
別人家的論文評(píng)審意見(jiàn) 已有2人參與
|
|
來(lái)源:https://blog.sciencenet.cn/blog-288924-953710.html 審稿人什么的最令人討厭了!花費(fèi)數(shù)以周記甚至數(shù)以月計(jì)的時(shí)間,終于把論文寫(xiě)到自己覺(jué)得完美無(wú)缺,滿懷希望把論文投遞出去。你心想發(fā)表論文的過(guò)程肯定會(huì)非常輕松,仿佛看到自己的論文印成鉛字在你眼前,別做夢(mèng)了! 審稿人會(huì)讓你感到絕望甚至想自殺的,當(dāng)然,如果他們心情好的話,可能只需要你回到電腦前做一下修改。說(shuō)真的,審稿人提出的那些無(wú)關(guān)緊要,毫無(wú)意義的問(wèn)題和評(píng)論到底有什么用? 審稿人跟你的溝通要么熱情誠(chéng)懇,要么鄭重其事,但是審稿人與期刊編輯之間的溝通就隨意多了。你知道審稿人在背著你說(shuō)你的哪些壞話嗎?請(qǐng)往下看。 2010年Environmental Microbiology雜志刊登了一部分雜志的審稿意見(jiàn),讓人在學(xué)術(shù)研究嚴(yán)肅、認(rèn)真的前提下充分體會(huì)了下,審稿人的幽默與詼諧,有的審稿意見(jiàn)甚至讓人啼笑皆非,下面列舉了一部分經(jīng)典的審稿意見(jiàn),讓大家也見(jiàn)識(shí)一下史上最狠的評(píng)審意見(jiàn),其他的內(nèi)容見(jiàn)文后附件,有興趣的可以繼續(xù)尋找。 PS:翻譯純屬搞笑,不喜勿拍! 毒舌搞笑篇: This paper is desperate. Please reject it completely and then block the author’s email ID so they can’t use the online system in future. 這文章太不給力了…請(qǐng)萬(wàn)勿發(fā)表。此外,建議鎖定該作者的電子郵件ID,避免此人日后繼續(xù)投稿。。 The writing and data presentation are so bad that I had to leave work and go home early and then spend time to wonder what life is about. 寫(xiě)作水平和展示的數(shù)據(jù)無(wú)敵了,哥不得不提前下班,匆匆回家,然后花時(shí)間思考下人活著是為了蝦米。。。 Reject – More holes than my grandad’s string vest! 拒發(fā),必須的。本文的漏洞比我爺爺網(wǎng)眼背心上的洞還多! I would suggest that EM set up a fund that pays for the red wine reviewers may need to digest manuscripts like this one. 哥建議貴刊(環(huán)境微生物學(xué)雜志)成立基金,以買單審稿人審閱時(shí)可能需要的紅酒,哥上火呀。 The biggest problem with this manuscript, which has nearly sucked the will to live out of me, is the terrible writing style. 這篇文章問(wèn)題多多,寫(xiě)作格式尤其可怕,簡(jiǎn)直摧殘了哥身體里求生的意志。 Hopeless – Seems like they have been asleep and are not up on recent work on metagenomics. 哥真的不能淡定了。顯然作者要么睡著了,要么完全沒(méi)跟上宏基因組學(xué)的前沿發(fā)展。 A weak paper, poor experimental design, comparison of sequences using different primers, no statistical analysis possible, carelessly written, poorly thought through. 文章很弱。實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)很銼,使用不同的引物序列比較;統(tǒng)計(jì)分析不置可否;寫(xiě)作粗獷。徹頭徹尾的悲劇呀。。。 I agreed to review this Ms whilst answering e-mails in the golden glow of a balmy evening on the terrace of our holiday hotel on Lake Como. Back in the harsh light of reality in Belfast I realize that it’s just on the limit of my comfort zone and that it would probably have been better not to have volunteered. 迷人的傍晚,金色的夕照,如果此時(shí)哥在科莫湖的假日酒店那鋪灑著余輝的露臺(tái)上,我會(huì)欣然同意審閱這篇文章。然而,在貝爾法斯特殘酷的日光里,我想剛才我那么想是被酒店啥的爽到了,文章么,咱能不提這事行嗎。。。 The presentation is of a standard that I would reject from an undergraduate student. 哥從本科開(kāi)始就不看這種操性的文章了。 The lack of negative controls. . . . results in the authors being lost in the funhouse. Unfortunately, I do not think they even realize this. 陰性對(duì)照實(shí)驗(yàn)的缺乏導(dǎo)致作者在游樂(lè)場(chǎng)里完全迷失了,不幸的是,我看他們現(xiàn)在還沒(méi)意識(shí)到。 "Season’s Greetings! I apologise for my slow response but a roast goose prevented me from answering emails for a few days." 節(jié)日快樂(lè)!回復(fù)慢了,真抱歉。有一只烤鵝妨礙我,讓我?guī)滋於紱](méi)顧得上回郵件。 "This paper is awfully written. There is no adequate objective and no reasonable conclusion. The literature is quoted at random and not in the context of argument. I have doubts about the methods and whether the effort of data gathering is sufficient to arrive at a useful conclusion." 這篇論文寫(xiě)得太爛了。目的不明確,結(jié)論不合理。引文都是亂引的,跟正文的論證完全對(duì)不上號(hào)。我懷疑這樣的實(shí)驗(yàn)方法,也懷疑他們收集的數(shù)據(jù)不足以得出有效結(jié)論。 見(jiàn)識(shí)過(guò)了審稿人的毒舌和幽默,再來(lái)見(jiàn)識(shí)一下審稿人怎么夸人。但當(dāng)審稿人遇到非常棒的論文,也會(huì)給出衷心的好評(píng)。 好評(píng)點(diǎn)贊篇: “Very much enjoyed reading this one, and do not have any significant comments. Wish I had thought of this one.” 這篇論文讀起來(lái)簡(jiǎn)直是一種享受,沒(méi)有任何意見(jiàn)。這么好的點(diǎn)子我當(dāng)初怎么沒(méi)想到! “There was little I could think of to improve this nice paper.” 這篇論文好得我都不知道要怎么改了。 "This is as solid a write up as I have seen, many spend much more time and space to say considerably less. It is a perfect example of a compact report." 這是我見(jiàn)過(guò)的最確鑿的報(bào)告,許多人花更多時(shí)間精力寫(xiě)出來(lái)的比這個(gè)差多了。作為一篇翔實(shí)的報(bào)告,這是一個(gè)完美的例子。 "landmark paper on P. putida physiology." 假單胞菌生理學(xué)研究的里程碑 "It is always a joy to review manuscripts such as this. Well conceived, well executed, well edited. Clean. Pristine. From start to finish." 評(píng)審這樣的稿件是件人生樂(lè)事:構(gòu)思周詳,實(shí)施得當(dāng),寫(xiě)得漂亮。干凈,純樸,從頭至尾。 以上審稿意見(jiàn)摘自于Referees‘ quotes - 2010. (2010) Environmental Microbiology,還有更多,理文編輯收集了2001年至2011年的每期內(nèi)容,讀起來(lái)完全停不下來(lái),越讀越上癮。 發(fā)自小木蟲(chóng)Android客戶端 |
|
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
| 3 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +8 | Y-cap 2026-03-29 | 11/550 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | AZMK 2026-03-29 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +8 | 十閑wx 2026-03-24 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 309求調(diào)劑 +15 | 誰(shuí)不是少年 2026-03-29 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研]
|
gr哈哈哈 2026-03-28 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿廈門(mén)大學(xué)材料工程專碩354找調(diào)劑。。 +5 | 貝唄鋇鋇 2026-03-30 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩調(diào)劑 +11 | 椰椰。 2026-03-29 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 262求調(diào)劑 +4 | ZZ..000 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航 335分 | 0856 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷 +8 | cccchenso 2026-03-29 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博自薦 +6 | whh869393 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 311(085601)求調(diào)劑 +4 | liziyeyeye 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +7 | A child 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑,各位老師看看我。! +5 | 祁祺祺 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 315調(diào)劑 +4 | 0860求調(diào)劑 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 081200-11408-276學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +4 | 崔wj 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間安全0839招調(diào)劑 +4 | w320357296 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0854人工智能方向招收調(diào)劑 +4 | 章小魚(yú)567 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +3 | AZMK 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | zzzzfan 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|