| 查看: 5356 | 回復: 24 | |||
[交流]
第一次投稿SCI期刊,這是編輯的回復,各位大神誰給分析一下是沒有機會了嗎 已有20人參與
|
|||
|
編輯的回復如下: I am writing to let you know that, after a careful editorial reading, we do not feel that your paper is suitable for publication in Physica A, and we will not therefore send it for further review. We emphasize that this decision has nothing to do with the quality of your work, nor its presentation. On the contrary, we feel that by taking this decision we are protecting your interests by precluding a lengthy review process that would likely not lead to acceptance. The basis of our decision is as follows. It has become increasingly apparent in the last few years that the centre of gravity of the journal has moved in such a manner that some topics are now not significantly represented in it. In our experience, some papers, whose fields are not well represented in the journal, have difficulty in obtaining expert reviews, incurring very long delays along the way. This situation is clearly unsatisfactory for both the Authors and Editors, and we now wish to avoid otherwise excellent work being drawn into such a process. We conclude that the journal should not try to serve all possible arenas, but (while remaining quite broad) we should focus sufficiently to ensure that a high quality of service is delivered to our Authors and Readers in those arenas. Obviously Physica A has in the past published several (too many in my opinion) papers around this theme. We hope that you understand our reasons for the decision. We also emphasize that this is in no way a reflection on the quality of your work on a variation of epidemic models for rumor spreading by information/rumor suppression or manipulation as presented in this paper, and indeed, we would welcome future submissions from you that seem closer to the main interest of the journal. |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
寫信是為了讓你知道,經(jīng)過仔細的編輯閱讀,我們覺得你的論文不適合發(fā)表在物理a雜志上,我們不會因此寄給你進一步的評論。我們強調(diào),這個決定與你的工作質量無關,也與它的表現(xiàn)無關。相反,我們認為通過這個決定,我們是在保護你的利益,因為它排除了一個很可能不會讓你接受的冗長的審查程序。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
鐵蟲 (正式寫手)
|
完全拒搞且不希望再投,但不是完全因為你的文章質量,還因為你的方向和期刊不鍥合問題。 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |

至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
這種AE拒稿是他個人認為不適合該刊,模板化拒稿,沒有送審自然不可能給建設性意見,沒必要給他寫郵件,他沒有義務給你提供意見和建議,你給他寫郵件反而顯得你不專業(yè),會覺得你自己連目標期刊是什么都不能判斷 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (知名作家)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料調(diào)劑 +12 | 匹克i 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 295材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +10 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 346求調(diào)劑 一志愿070303有機化學 +6 | 蘿卜燉青菜 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +5 | Sanmu-124 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 環(huán)境科學與工程334分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 王一一依依 2026-03-30 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑,一志愿 南京航空航天大學大學 ,080500材料科學與工程學碩 +6 | @taotao 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +15 | Micky11223 2026-03-25 | 20/1000 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京理工大學本科211材料工程294求調(diào)劑 +8 | mikasa的圍巾 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料化工調(diào)劑 總分330 +14 | zhubinhao 2026-03-27 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑求院校招收 +6 | 鶴鯨鴿 2026-03-28 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 083000學碩274求調(diào)劑 +8 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 本科新能源科學與工程,一志愿華理能動285求調(diào)劑 +3 | AZMK 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +5 | 舊吢 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑推薦 材料 304 +15 | 荷包蛋hyj 2026-03-26 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 331環(huán)境科學與工程求調(diào)劑 +3 | 熠然好運氣 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程求調(diào)劑 +9 | 多久上課 2026-03-27 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 335 分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拒絕冷暴力 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 網(wǎng)絡空間安全0839招調(diào)劑 +4 | w320357296 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|