| 查看: 5352 | 回復(fù): 24 | |||
逍遙客89新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
[交流]
第一次投稿SCI期刊,這是編輯的回復(fù),各位大神誰給分析一下是沒有機(jī)會(huì)了嗎 已有20人參與
|
||
|
編輯的回復(fù)如下: I am writing to let you know that, after a careful editorial reading, we do not feel that your paper is suitable for publication in Physica A, and we will not therefore send it for further review. We emphasize that this decision has nothing to do with the quality of your work, nor its presentation. On the contrary, we feel that by taking this decision we are protecting your interests by precluding a lengthy review process that would likely not lead to acceptance. The basis of our decision is as follows. It has become increasingly apparent in the last few years that the centre of gravity of the journal has moved in such a manner that some topics are now not significantly represented in it. In our experience, some papers, whose fields are not well represented in the journal, have difficulty in obtaining expert reviews, incurring very long delays along the way. This situation is clearly unsatisfactory for both the Authors and Editors, and we now wish to avoid otherwise excellent work being drawn into such a process. We conclude that the journal should not try to serve all possible arenas, but (while remaining quite broad) we should focus sufficiently to ensure that a high quality of service is delivered to our Authors and Readers in those arenas. Obviously Physica A has in the past published several (too many in my opinion) papers around this theme. We hope that you understand our reasons for the decision. We also emphasize that this is in no way a reflection on the quality of your work on a variation of epidemic models for rumor spreading by information/rumor suppression or manipulation as presented in this paper, and indeed, we would welcome future submissions from you that seem closer to the main interest of the journal. |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
寫信是為了讓你知道,經(jīng)過仔細(xì)的編輯閱讀,我們覺得你的論文不適合發(fā)表在物理a雜志上,我們不會(huì)因此寄給你進(jìn)一步的評(píng)論。我們強(qiáng)調(diào),這個(gè)決定與你的工作質(zhì)量無關(guān),也與它的表現(xiàn)無關(guān)。相反,我們認(rèn)為通過這個(gè)決定,我們是在保護(hù)你的利益,因?yàn)樗懦艘粋(gè)很可能不會(huì)讓你接受的冗長的審查程序。 發(fā)自小木蟲IOS客戶端 |
鐵蟲 (正式寫手)
|
完全拒搞且不希望再投,但不是完全因?yàn)槟愕奈恼沦|(zhì)量,還因?yàn)槟愕姆较蚝推诳诲浐蠁栴}。 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |

至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
這種AE拒稿是他個(gè)人認(rèn)為不適合該刊,模板化拒稿,沒有送審自然不可能給建設(shè)性意見,沒必要給他寫郵件,他沒有義務(wù)給你提供意見和建議,你給他寫郵件反而顯得你不專業(yè),會(huì)覺得你自己連目標(biāo)期刊是什么都不能判斷 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)
至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (正式寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
新蟲 (知名作家)
新蟲 (著名寫手)
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿南昌大學(xué)324求調(diào)劑 +8 | hanamiko 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +7 | 青春裁為三截 2026-03-29 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程找調(diào)劑 +16 | oatmealR 2026-03-29 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 求化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +11 | wulanna 2026-03-28 | 11/550 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
arxiv背書人郵件求助
20+3
|
redcom 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 318一志愿吉林大學(xué)生物與醫(yī)藥 求調(diào)劑 +5 | 篤行致遠(yuǎn). 2026-03-28 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料科學(xué)與工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 深V宿舍吧 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 各位老師好,我的一志愿為北京科技大學(xué)085601材料專碩 +9 | Koxui 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華北電力大學(xué)能動(dòng)專碩,293,求調(diào)劑 +3 | 15537177284 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 394求調(diào)劑 +3 | 好事多磨靜候佳?/a> 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑一志愿哈工大324 +7 | 閆旭東 2026-03-28 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +6 | HanBeiNingZC 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +4 | 零八# 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 安徽大學(xué)專碩生物與醫(yī)藥專業(yè)(086000)324分,英語已過四六級(jí),六級(jí)521,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 美味可樂雞翅 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 359求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王了個(gè)楠 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
平樂樂樂 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械學(xué)碩310分,數(shù)一英一,一志愿211本科雙非找調(diào)劑信息 +3 | @357 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 打過很多競賽,085406控制工程300分,求調(diào)劑 +3 | askeladz 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
13659058978 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大化學(xué)322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 17501029541 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|