| 查看: 2374 | 回復(fù): 17 | |||
abrastein金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
可以申訴不? 已有15人參與
|
|
http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1860420 上次的審稿意見。 編輯給出同樣的意見,如下。是同一的審稿人,仍然是拒稿。這種情況下可以申訴不? 怎么寫? Dear Dr. : I have received two reviews of your manuscript. One reviewer suggests relatively minor revisions. However, the other reviewer has found that the manuscript does not provide sufficient new physical insight to warrant publication in the Journal of Physical Chemistry. I’m sorry, but based on the serious concerns of this reviewer, I cannot accept your manuscript for publication at this time. However, if you believe that you can adequately address the concerns of this reviewer, then you are welcome to resubmit a revised version of your manuscript at a later date, in which case your manuscript will receive a new submittal date and new manuscript number. Thank you for considering the Journal of Physical Chemistry for the publication of your manuscript. With sincere regards, Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: This paper is not recommended because it does not provide new physical insights. Comments:Main comment:The authors carefully studied the possible origin of peak C2, which indeed seems specific to Fe/316 ss electrode in contact with the Ni bath. The data are rather convincing. As discussed below the title of this paper is totally misleading as Ni UPD is not yet proved. In fact, a quantitative analysis of the present data, which was not performed by the authors (charge measured under peak C2 in Fig. 3, mass change during fist scan in Fug. 4, charge under peak 3 in Fig. 5a), rather indicate that the observed phenomenon is not related to so-called metal UPD but to some other reacrtion, which needs to be identified. Metal UPD refers to the formation of one monolayer (very occasionally 2 monolayers) of a metal on a substrate. All quantitative estimates below are inconsistent with the formation of 1-2 Ni MLs. - The charge under peak C2 (100 µC/cm2) is far larger than that of a monolayer (0.59 µC/cm2). We agree with authors that this peak may be assigned to HER. Actually this would be a more pertinent conclusion than assigning peak C2 to NI UPD, because the charge associated with NI UPD (if it occurs) is negligible compared to the measured one. - The QCMB data are also showing that “something” occurs on the surface during the first negative scan of potential and then vanishes upon subsequent scanning. The authors should have converted the mass into a Ni thickness. A mass change of a few µg/cm2 is several orders of magnitude larger than the mass of a Ni monolayer (see Lachenwitzer and Magnussen in J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 7424-7430). The question therefore remains open concerning the observed phenomenon. - Also the anodic charge measured in Fig. 5, curve 2 (blue line) should be converted into a Ni thickness. This is not done. However, one may already estimate that it is again very large for a Ni monolayer as it is comparable to the charge corresponding to the dissolution of the Fe film from the Fe/316ss electrode.- Fig. 7 gives strong support that the phenomenon is related to HER and not Ni UPD. Other comments:- In introduction, in some references about Ni UPD, the solution composition plays a decisive role as anions are necessary to induce the phenomenon. In ionic liquids, the Au surface is also covered by an adlayer formed by the Al species. - pg 2 : The definition of Fe/316ss or Ni/316 ss electrodes should be complete. Give an estimate of the Fe and Ni thickness. - AFM imaging (Fig. 6) cannot be exploited as the features reflect “tip imaging” rather than surface imaging. These images must be removed or, better, done again with a fine AFM tip. Conclusion:In conclusion the authors have evidenced a real effect (related to peak C2 at a Fe/316 ss electrode in a Ni solution). However the conclusions they derive from their data are inconsistent with a Ni UPD process. This paper must therefore be rejected again as the conclusions are not supported by results. Alternatively the paper might be published after revision if the authors find a relevant conclusion to their study. Reviewer: 2 Recommendation: This paper is publishable subject to minor revisions noted. Further review is not needed. Comments:The manuscript is dealing with an interesting topic, the UPD of Ni on the Fe surface.Due to the revisions made the manuscript is better understandable now. However before publication the following points should be clarified: Experimental section lease note the current which flows during the preparation of Ni and Fe electrodes. If both electrodes were prepared at -1.2V, what is then the current efficiency for both processes and the thickness of film produced? What is the absolute current efficiency? How was the QMB calibrated, means how was exact determined the Factor C?from what kind of calculation one knows the current efficiency of the process?[ Last edited by abrastein on 2010-5-14 at 11:59 ] |
至尊木蟲 (正式寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
s

銅蟲 (正式寫手)
銅蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
能否把前因后果介紹清楚,是已經(jīng)重投一次后,被同一審稿人據(jù)稿,還是投到新的雜志又被同一審稿人據(jù)稿? 再者,審稿人說的意見樓主認不認可?你想申訴是因為審稿人誤讀了你的論文還是覺得他故意針對你們?應(yīng)該解釋清楚。 按照第一個審稿人的意見,他承認你的論文有一定的研究價值,但對你的結(jié)論不滿意,認為你的很多推斷是錯誤的。希望你修改后再投,重新考慮。我認為這和大修差不多。最好仔細研究審稿人的意見,做相應(yīng)的修改,引用其提供的論文,改后再投還是很有希望的。 祝好運~ ![]() [ Last edited by very2 on 2010-5-14 at 06:48 ] |

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 086502化學工程342求調(diào)劑 +4 | 阿姨復(fù)古不過 2026-03-27 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯滴的基本都 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 340求調(diào)劑 +5 | jhx777 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿哈爾濱工業(yè)大學材料與化工方向336分 +6 | 辰沐5211314 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學 +6 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 298調(diào)劑 +3 | jiyingjie123 2026-03-27 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿211,335分,0856,求調(diào)劑院校和導(dǎo)師 +4 | 傾____蕭 2026-03-27 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +5 | .m.. 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學一志愿南京師范大學303求調(diào)劑 +3 | zzffylgg 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 359求調(diào)劑 +4 | 王了個楠 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 290分調(diào)劑求助 +3 | 吉祥止止陳 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 錦衣衛(wèi)藤椒 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +15 | Zhao anqi 2026-03-22 | 15/750 |
|
|
[考研] 086003食品工程求調(diào)劑 +6 | 淼淼111 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 上海電力大學材料防護與新材料重點實驗室招收調(diào)劑研究生(材料、化學、電化學,環(huán)境) +4 | 我愛學電池 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | 13853210211 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑,跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Zhangbod 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研]
|
Grand777 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 336求調(diào)劑 +5 | rmc8866 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|