| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3523 | 回復(fù): 29 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
hudasuhai木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 意見回來了!! 已有17人參與
|
||
|
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 意見回來了!!三個(gè)專家,兩個(gè)同意,意見還是不錯(cuò),另外一個(gè)專家的意見極差。 怎么辦?而且差意見的專家就是否定了工作,都不知道怎么回復(fù)好,編輯給了大修,蟲蟲們有這樣的經(jīng)歷不。 指望這文章呢。。。。。!哎 Review has been completed on your paper. Based on the detailed comments of the reviewers, I am recommending to the Journal Editor that your paper be considered for publication as a Research Paper in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering pending further revision. My recommendation is: Major revisions required. Reviewer 1: -this paper has many grammatical and writing errors which are very distracting -the size of the vessel for the simulations conducted is very small wrt industrial sized vessels, with only minor mentioning of scaling -No experimental validation or testing to show that this work is valid -Significance of the work is shallow. Not worthy of this journal. Reviewer 2: This manuscript presents the numerical analysis of stir casting of aluminum matrix composites using a commercial software package, ANSYS/Fluent. The flow patterns associated with various stirrer configurations, stirring speeds, and stirrer angles were analyzed and the regions and volumes of stagnant and dead zones were examined to determine the optimal process conditions and stirrer and crucible designs. Overall, the study is fairly complete and the predictions seem to be reasonable. However, there are a number of areas that need to be revised, as listed below, for purposes of clarification or completeness prior to publication. 1. While the results were shown on the axis cross sections, the flow field should be three-dimensional because the geometry of the stirrer blades is not axis symmetrical. Please clarify if the analysis was done in three-dimensions or not. In addition, it looks like only the velocity components are on the plane of the axis cross sections. The authors should also include some prediction results on the planes (r-theta plane) that are perpendicular to the axis of the crucible. 2. The authors stated that “From initial trials and Reynolds number examination, the k-(zeta) turbulent model and the laminar flow model were chosen to model the mixer system.” However, in the results subsequently presented, it is not clear at all which model (turbulent or laminar) they corresponded to. The authors should include the corresponding Reynolds number and model type in the tables. This will help to substantiate the remarks made by the authors corresponding to Figs. 7 (d) and (e) that state: “.. the turbulence was apparently viewed in the crucible…” 3. Please include the criteria of stagnant and dead zones (in terms of velocity or other criterion). 4. The stirrer angle information is missing for Figure 3 and Table 1. 5. The following sentence (above Table 1) needs to be rewritten: “While the multi-stage stirrer yielded the relatively satisfactory flow pattern to disperse the ceramic particles in the molten matrix compared with the other two stirrer geometries.” 6. It is not clear what criterion was used to determine that the axial velocity is large enough to suck the air from the fluid surface and cause gas entrapment. 7. Please elaborate on why the “frictionless” (instead of “no-slip”) boundary condition was imposed on the surface of the crucible. 8. Page 3: “…, polymerization, etc [15, 16].” should be ““…, polymerization, etc. [15, 16].” 9. Page 8: “… without a axial suction …” should be “… without an axial suction …” Reviewer 3: This paper reports theoretical work on the flow behavior of fluid in a stir casting. A finite element method was used to simulate the flow pattern of fluid in a vassal during stir casting. The authors discussed the several parameters that affect the flowing patterns and particle distributions. This is an interesting paper and it is recommended for publication. 文章經(jīng)歷: 這篇文章去年底投了MMP,就一個(gè)專家意見,還不錯(cuò),編輯給大修,返回后,再審,結(jié)果被槍斃了,后來按照給的意見,修改投了這期刊,現(xiàn)在還是大修。 苦!苦行僧 真的是大修,修怕了! 這些專家一個(gè)意見在天上,一個(gè)意見在地下,一個(gè)意見這么懸在中間!怎么回復(fù)好???????????????? [ Last edited by hudasuhai on 2010-6-18 at 08:28 ] |

木蟲 (正式寫手)

木蟲 (著名寫手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0817 化學(xué)工程 299分求調(diào)劑 有科研經(jīng)歷 有二區(qū)文章 +14 | rare12345 2026-03-18 | 14/700 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 288求調(diào)劑 +14 | 于海海海海 2026-03-19 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國海洋大學(xué),生物學(xué),301分,求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1孫悟空 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武漢理工材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +4 | Doleres 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +3 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調(diào)劑 +3 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿985,本科211,0817化學(xué)工程與技術(shù)319求調(diào)劑 +10 | Liwangman 2026-03-15 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 085700資源與環(huán)境308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑,一作一項(xiàng)核心論文五項(xiàng)專利,省、國級(jí)證書40+數(shù)一英一287 +8 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大,求調(diào)劑 +4 | 材化逐夢人 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小賈同學(xué)123 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 26考研一志愿中國石油大學(xué)(華東)305分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 嘉年新程 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 070305求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +4 | 這么名字咋樣 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個(gè)專家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | ?醬給調(diào)劑跪了 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +4 | 學(xué)員97LZgn 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 085600 260分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 天空還下雨么 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 是Lupa啊 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|