| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3525 | 回復(fù): 29 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
hudasuhai木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 意見(jiàn)回來(lái)了!! 已有17人參與
|
||
|
Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 意見(jiàn)回來(lái)了!三個(gè)專家,兩個(gè)同意,意見(jiàn)還是不錯(cuò),另外一個(gè)專家的意見(jiàn)極差。 怎么辦?而且差意見(jiàn)的專家就是否定了工作,都不知道怎么回復(fù)好,編輯給了大修,蟲(chóng)蟲(chóng)們有這樣的經(jīng)歷不? 指望這文章呢。。。。。。“ Review has been completed on your paper. Based on the detailed comments of the reviewers, I am recommending to the Journal Editor that your paper be considered for publication as a Research Paper in the Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering pending further revision. My recommendation is: Major revisions required. Reviewer 1: -this paper has many grammatical and writing errors which are very distracting -the size of the vessel for the simulations conducted is very small wrt industrial sized vessels, with only minor mentioning of scaling -No experimental validation or testing to show that this work is valid -Significance of the work is shallow. Not worthy of this journal. Reviewer 2: This manuscript presents the numerical analysis of stir casting of aluminum matrix composites using a commercial software package, ANSYS/Fluent. The flow patterns associated with various stirrer configurations, stirring speeds, and stirrer angles were analyzed and the regions and volumes of stagnant and dead zones were examined to determine the optimal process conditions and stirrer and crucible designs. Overall, the study is fairly complete and the predictions seem to be reasonable. However, there are a number of areas that need to be revised, as listed below, for purposes of clarification or completeness prior to publication. 1. While the results were shown on the axis cross sections, the flow field should be three-dimensional because the geometry of the stirrer blades is not axis symmetrical. Please clarify if the analysis was done in three-dimensions or not. In addition, it looks like only the velocity components are on the plane of the axis cross sections. The authors should also include some prediction results on the planes (r-theta plane) that are perpendicular to the axis of the crucible. 2. The authors stated that “From initial trials and Reynolds number examination, the k-(zeta) turbulent model and the laminar flow model were chosen to model the mixer system.” However, in the results subsequently presented, it is not clear at all which model (turbulent or laminar) they corresponded to. The authors should include the corresponding Reynolds number and model type in the tables. This will help to substantiate the remarks made by the authors corresponding to Figs. 7 (d) and (e) that state: “.. the turbulence was apparently viewed in the crucible…” 3. Please include the criteria of stagnant and dead zones (in terms of velocity or other criterion). 4. The stirrer angle information is missing for Figure 3 and Table 1. 5. The following sentence (above Table 1) needs to be rewritten: “While the multi-stage stirrer yielded the relatively satisfactory flow pattern to disperse the ceramic particles in the molten matrix compared with the other two stirrer geometries.” 6. It is not clear what criterion was used to determine that the axial velocity is large enough to suck the air from the fluid surface and cause gas entrapment. 7. Please elaborate on why the “frictionless” (instead of “no-slip”) boundary condition was imposed on the surface of the crucible. 8. Page 3: “…, polymerization, etc [15, 16].” should be ““…, polymerization, etc. [15, 16].” 9. Page 8: “… without a axial suction …” should be “… without an axial suction …” Reviewer 3: This paper reports theoretical work on the flow behavior of fluid in a stir casting. A finite element method was used to simulate the flow pattern of fluid in a vassal during stir casting. The authors discussed the several parameters that affect the flowing patterns and particle distributions. This is an interesting paper and it is recommended for publication. 文章經(jīng)歷: 這篇文章去年底投了MMP,就一個(gè)專家意見(jiàn),還不錯(cuò),編輯給大修,返回后,再審,結(jié)果被槍斃了,后來(lái)按照給的意見(jiàn),修改投了這期刊,現(xiàn)在還是大修。 苦!苦行僧 真的是大修,修怕了! 這些專家一個(gè)意見(jiàn)在天上,一個(gè)意見(jiàn)在地下,一個(gè)意見(jiàn)這么懸在中間!怎么回復(fù)好???????????????? [ Last edited by hudasuhai on 2010-6-18 at 08:28 ] |

木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)

木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)

| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 08工學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 用戶573181 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 265求調(diào)劑 +8 | 梁梁校校 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211 +7 | chaojifeixia 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[論文投稿]
申請(qǐng)回稿延期一個(gè)月,編輯同意了。但系統(tǒng)上的時(shí)間沒(méi)變,給編輯又寫(xiě)郵件了,沒(méi)回復(fù)
10+3
|
wangf9518 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +9 | 冷笙123 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 294求調(diào)劑材料與化工專碩 +14 | 陌の森林 2026-03-18 | 14/700 |
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑 +10 | 慕寒mio 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工求調(diào)劑 +7 | 為學(xué)666 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調(diào)劑 +3 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 287求調(diào)劑 +3 | 晨昏線與星海 2026-03-19 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專業(yè)求調(diào)劑 +5 | hanamiko 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工 +5 | 安全上岸! 2026-03-16 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +8 | 一定有學(xué)上- 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | 八6八68 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京大學(xué),080500材料科學(xué)與工程,調(diào)劑 +4 | Jy? 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 太陽(yáng)花天天開(kāi)心 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +5 | 時(shí)間點(diǎn) 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +4 | ahbd 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑 +6 | 太想進(jìn)步了0608 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 中科大材料專碩319求調(diào)劑 +3 | 孟鑫材料 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|