| 查看: 2124 | 回復: 11 | |||
jinronghua至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
|
[交流]
稿件被拒,打算回信力爭 已有7人參與
|
| The manuscript contains little new information that is not already available in the literature. The target application is new but there are 10 papers (Scopus search) that describe a similar set of experiments for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source. Thus, the current manuscript lacks the novelty required for publication in the Journal of Chromatography. The manuscript is well-written and the application should be of interest to a phytoanalytical journal since ionic liquids are considered novel solvents with respect to their use in practical applications. |

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
|
Dear editors: I have read your comments: “The manuscript contains little new information that is not already available in the literature. The target application is new but there are 10 papers (Scopus search) that describe a similar set of experiments for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source. Thus, the current manuscript lacks the novelty required for publication in the Journal of Chromatography. The manuscript is well-written and the application should be of interest to a phytoanalytical journal since ionic liquids are considered novel solvents with respect to their use in practical applications.” And I have also read the 10 papers as you describe using ionic liquids and microwaves as a heating source for the isolation of active ingredients from plant materials. Admittedly, we exploit the same method apparently. However, The mechanisms applied are different. Their extraction methods as you mention use ionic liquid as microwave absorbing medium. On the contrary, we use ionic liquid as 。。。。. It is well known that the ionic liquid 1-N-butyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride can dissolve a great quantity of cellulose. Therefore, we exploit this property and use [C4mim)Cl 。。。。. Several solvents were used to extract active ingredients from plant materials when cellulose was dissolved in the 。。。. Microwave just improve the 。。。 rate. I wish you can reconsider our manuscript. Thank you Best regards Sincerely, Dr Xiaoning An |

至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會議專家
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會議專家
金蟲 (正式寫手)
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)

木蟲 (正式寫手)
是牛不是牛人

|
我剛一篇申訴的文章被JMC接受,感覺確實不容易,關鍵是你的文章是否真的有價值以及審稿人的意見是否片面或者不正確。如果審稿人確實有不對的地方,先自己心平氣和幾天然后再做申訴,重要的是審稿人不可能全為錯誤,畢竟有些意見是好的,而且可能自己的工作確實有不到位的,仔細修改,語氣很重要,一定要緩和要不連編輯這關也通過不了。申訴最重要的是你反駁的有理有據,多引用文獻去解釋你的問題,或者干脆補做試驗去證明審稿人的不足。千萬別改都不改就直接去申訴,這樣幾乎不可能。我的這篇文章實際上審稿人很不講道理的,但是畢竟人家花時間去看你文章,所以還是要溫和的反駁,別直接就說“你是錯的”,記住編輯是站在審稿人一邊的。 總之,樓主要先冷靜下來,在有理有據的申訴。祝你好運! PS:看了下樓主的申訴信,語氣不行,建議還是冷下來一兩天,重新寫下! [ Last edited by mouse3511 on 2010-7-5 at 09:53 ] |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學,080502,354分求調劑 +4 | 守候夕陽CF 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 328求調劑,英語六級551,有科研經歷 +3 | 生物工程調劑 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學調劑 +7 | 妮妮ninicgb 2026-03-15 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿武理材料305分求調劑 +5 | 想上岸的鯉魚 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 314求調劑 +8 | 無懈可擊的巨人 2026-03-12 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 化工學碩306求調劑 +10 | 42838695 2026-03-12 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 297求調劑 +8 | 戲精丹丹丹 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 299求調劑 +5 | △小透明* 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學求調劑 總分331 +3 | ZY-05 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 293求調劑 +11 | zjl的號 2026-03-16 | 16/800 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學 生命科學與健康學院-課題組招收2026級食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研化學學碩調劑,一志愿985 +4 | 張vvvv 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調劑 +3 | p asserby. 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 0854控制工程 359求調劑 可跨專業(yè) +3 | 626776879 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 0703 物理化學調劑 +3 | 我可以上岸的對?/a> 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 327求調劑 +6 | 拾光任染 2026-03-15 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 080500,材料學碩302分求調劑學校 +4 | 初識可樂 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 復試調劑 +3 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調劑 +3 | 程雨杭 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|