 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 10 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2820 | 回復(fù): 9 | ||||
wxchen326銀蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
幫忙分析一下這個(gè)審稿意見如何？先謝謝各位 已有7人參與
|
|
大家?guī)兔纯?這個(gè)審稿意如何。尤其是第二個(gè)審稿人，他的潛意思是什么？ 因?yàn)闆]有提到關(guān)于大修還是小修的問題，所以比較迷茫，再次真誠的希望大牛們給予指導(dǎo)。 Reviewers have now commented on your paper. You will see that they are advising that you revise your manuscript. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be pleased to reconsider my decision. For your guidance, reviewers' comments are appended below. If you decide to revise the work, please submit a list of changes or a rebuttal against each point which is being raised when you submit the revised manuscript. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1: The paper is appropriate for a journal like IJTS. However, prior to publishing, some adjustments to the paper must be added. The paper is generally well written, overall information on ejectors seems appropriate but the paper lacks adequate details to fully describe the methodology and discussion presented in the paper. Accordingly, the authors should consider revising their paper, based on the following comments: Figure 11: specify the discharge pressure Figure 7: the symbol Pi should be added in the nomenclature English: please ensure that the document is checked for spelling mistakes P.6: the statement: 'Therefore only heat between motive and induced NG has been taken into consideration in the present simulation' should be more detailed in its meaning and clearly stated. Account of this heat exchange being implicit (through the energy equation). P.9: In the optimization approach described in this page, there are a number of information elements missing and/or leading to confusion: - was an initial size used? On what method was it based? - are the other 'independent' parameters fixed while Pp9-11: The entrainment ratio is indicated to be around 10% while it is stated elsewhere that (in the abstract and/or the introduction) to reach over 90%. Clarify to lift inconsistencies. P.11, eq. 3: use tan-1 symbol which is more common for the co-tangent. P.11, model validation: Validation in general understanding means that a comparison between numerical/experimental results under controlled conditions is made. It does not appear to be the case here because what is presented is a comparison between predictions from two models. This can be considered as an analysis example based on the developed model(s). The authors should therefore clarify this (link with $4 p.13, experimental verification which may be considered as a form of validation). P.13, The uncertainty on induced flow rate is high. Authors should evaluate the impact on model validation when using these results. Reviewer #3: The submitted manuscript presents the numerical and experimental analysis of an ejector for boosting gas removal from low pressure wells. The subject of the paper is interesting and relevant to the profile of International Journal of Thermal Sciences. However in the present form, it is not recommended for publication. Comments: Language: The English of the manuscript is relatively poor. It should be significantly improved before re-submission. Scientific issues: - On page 3, the authors claim that 1D models are useful "to understand the basic flow physics in the ejector". I do not agree with the statement since these models provide very little information on flow physics. They are more useful for evaluating the effect of the operating conditions on ejector performance or designing "baseline" ejector geometry. - On page 6, reference [15] is used to justify the turbulence model applied. I think correctly it should be another one: Bartosiewicz, Y., Aidoun, Z., Desevaux, P., Mercadier, Y., 2005. Numerical and experimental investigations on supersonic ejectors. Int. J. of Heat and Fluid Flow 26, 56-70. - On page 7-8, it is explained how the length of a component is related to the converging/diverging angles, etc. It is trivial; there is no need to discuss that. - Information is not given how the baseline model, used as a starting point for geometrical optimisation, was chosen. There were four design variables for the performance optimisation. Only one was varied at a time defining such its optimal value. This process could be argued to be the best one… - Section 3 is referred to as model validation, however model validation is carried out in section 4. Because of that it is confusing whether the results in section 3 come from simulations or experiments. All the figures related to this section include a "fitting curve", however it is not mentioned in the text how those curves were obtained. - On page 14 and under point 2 in Conclusions, the authors claim that the entrainment ratio showed an optimum value as a function of the primary inlet pressure for suction pressures below 4.5 MPa. It is not obvious from the data presented for 2MPa. Also there is no physical explanation why it should not be the case for suction pressures higher than 4.5 MPa. The author's statement is probably true only for the range of operating conditions (motive fluid pressure) considered! - Table 1 compares the present ejector design to previously published one. Very little difference can be observed. |
回復(fù)此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 Publication tips |
» 猜你喜歡
304求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
326求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
一志愿蘇州大學(xué)材料工程（085601）專碩有科研經(jīng)歷三項(xiàng)國獎(jiǎng)兩個(gè)實(shí)用型專利一項(xiàng)省級(jí)立項(xiàng)
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
-
環(huán)境工程調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
本人考085602 化學(xué)工程 專碩
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
一志愿211 0703方向310分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)336分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
318求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 大家?guī)臀曳治鲆幌�，這種情況對(duì)投稿影響大么
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)幫忙看看這個(gè)審稿意見
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)大家?guī)兔聪逻@個(gè)審稿意見怎么處理好
已經(jīng)有22人回復(fù)
- by independent method是什么意思？
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 大牛幫忙分析一下專家意見，下次希望大不大？
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)大家?guī)兔纯磳徃迦说囊庖�，謝謝!
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見分析與修改
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
- 編輯給的審稿意見，怎么解答啊~~謝謝親們~~
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)大家?guī)臀曳治鱿聦徃逡庖?/a>
已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
- 二審審稿意見怎么回復(fù)？謝謝大家，幫忙看看吧，給點(diǎn)意見
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- Energy的審稿意見，望各位大俠指導(dǎo)
已經(jīng)有22人回復(fù)
- 大家?guī)头治鱿聦徃逡庖?/a>
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- ECM審稿意見返回了，求各位幫忙解讀一下，謝謝
已經(jīng)有28人回復(fù)
- 大家請(qǐng)幫我看看這個(gè)審稿意見是什么意思？
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)各位幫忙看看審稿意見
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)各位SCI大�？纯丛搶徃逡庖娙绾位貜�(fù)
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
- 大家?guī)涂匆幌逻@個(gè)審稿意見棘手不，謝謝了。
已經(jīng)有22人回復(fù)
- International Journal of Thermal Sciences,4個(gè)審稿人，3個(gè)修改后接收，1個(gè)拒
已經(jīng)有19人回復(fù)
- 文章第二次修改，有點(diǎn)迷茫
已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
- 求高人幫忙分析下APL審稿意見
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見回來了，大家?guī)兔Ψ治鲆幌�，有些意見看不懂�?/a>
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
- 專家審稿意見，請(qǐng)大家?guī)兔Ψ治觯?/a>
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 幫忙看下審稿意見
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 大家?guī)臀曳治鲆幌耺aterial and design的審稿意見，錄用幾率大不？
已經(jīng)有24人回復(fù)
- 審稿意見回來了，大家?guī)兔匆幌��！?/a>
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
- 【求助】大家?guī)臀曳治鱿聦徃迦私o的評(píng)語 （關(guān)于納米顆粒細(xì)胞內(nèi)化）
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
whutxdh
至尊木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 10951.6
- 散金: 6
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 732
- 在線: 791.9小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 954877
- 注冊(cè): 2010-02-11
- 專業(yè): 無機(jī)非金屬類光電信息與功
2樓2010-07-19 16:56:54
wxchen326
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1458.6
- 散金: 100
- 帖子: 166
- 在線: 146小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 757925
- 注冊(cè): 2009-04-26
3樓2010-07-19 16:59:11
4樓2010-07-19 19:06:58
wxchen326
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1458.6
- 散金: 100
- 帖子: 166
- 在線: 146小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 757925
- 注冊(cè): 2009-04-26
5樓2010-07-19 20:28:33
screw
木蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 949.1
- 散金: 86
- 帖子: 867
- 在線: 95.1小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 447690
- 注冊(cè): 2007-11-01
- 性別: GG
6樓2010-07-19 20:32:01
bighead8012
金蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 805.6
- 散金: 102
- 帖子: 147
- 在線: 31.6小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 531012
- 注冊(cè): 2008-03-22
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 理論和計(jì)算化學(xué)
7樓2010-07-19 20:41:29
sunke
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
- 應(yīng)助: 172 (高中生)
- 貴賓: 0.417
- 金幣: 15024.8
- 散金: 687
- 紅花: 7
- 沙發(fā): 8
- 帖子: 8688
- 在線: 535.1小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 461515
- 注冊(cè): 2007-11-18
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機(jī)非金屬類高溫超導(dǎo)與磁
8樓2010-07-19 20:47:40
zhaoyuehong
金蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 769.1
- 散金: 15
- 帖子: 234
- 在線: 23.6小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 1029633
- 注冊(cè): 2010-05-27
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 催化化學(xué)
9樓2010-07-19 20:57:17
wxchen326
銀蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1458.6
- 散金: 100
- 帖子: 166
- 在線: 146小時(shí)
- 蟲號(hào): 757925
- 注冊(cè): 2009-04-26
10樓2010-07-19 21:09:16
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 wxchen326 的主題更新
| 10 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +6 | 小熊joy 2026-03-14 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +6 | 冬十三 2026-03-15 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 326求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩274一志愿211求調(diào)劑 +5 | 薛云鵬 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求老師收留調(diào)劑 +4 | jiang姜66 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩326求調(diào)劑 +4 | 墨煜姒莘 2026-03-15 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085601材料工程315分求調(diào)劑 +3 | yang_0104 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 297一志愿上交085600求調(diào)劑 +5 | 指尖八千里 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑】-一志愿華中師范大學(xué)-六級(jí)475 +5 | Becho359 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 328，0703考生求調(diào)劑，一志愿為東北師范大學(xué) +4 | 觀素律 2026-03-09 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +4 | 唐薏薏 2026-03-09 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] b區(qū)環(huán)境工程求調(diào)劑 +4 | Maps1 2026-03-10 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +3 | Dizzy123@ 2026-03-10 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求材料調(diào)劑 +5 | 隔壁陳先生 2026-03-12 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 281求調(diào)劑 +9 | Koxui 2026-03-12 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 296求調(diào)劑 +3 | 大口吃飯 身體健 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +3 | ADT 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑（食品/專碩） +3 | xc321 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 279求調(diào)劑 +3 | 莫xiao 2026-03-10 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 哈工大材料324求調(diào)劑 +6 | 閆旭東 2026-03-10 | 8/400 |
|