 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 2282 | 回復(fù): 19 | |||
[交流]
對(duì)所謂磚家也不要太在意 已有17人參與
|
|
本人現(xiàn)在美國(guó)讀博士，前段時(shí)間給碩士老板寫(xiě)了個(gè)本子，前后花了2個(gè)晚上的時(shí)間。因?yàn)槭亲鳛閼?yīng)付差事來(lái)寫(xiě)的（主要是考慮到將來(lái)要回國(guó)的話，還得有人罩著），很多圖都懶得畫(huà)了。最后給報(bào)銷(xiāo)了臺(tái)筆記本，呵呵，真夠廉價(jià)的。 碩士老板是985院校老師，從來(lái)沒(méi)有申到自然科學(xué)基金，其他基金好像不少。最后結(jié)果，3A1B1C 資助60多萬(wàn)。至于他是不是找關(guān)系我就不知道了，我感覺(jué)應(yīng)該是沒(méi)那么大的能量。因?yàn)樗膊皇鞘裁创u家，當(dāng)初他的博士論文還是我讀碩士的時(shí)候給他寫(xiě)的。 今天收到評(píng)審意見(jiàn)，我笑了。這些所謂磚家的評(píng)審意見(jiàn)，要是從conference reviewer的角度來(lái)說(shuō)，狗屁都不是�；旧戏悍憾�， 比如最后的結(jié)論基本上是： “課題對(duì)該國(guó)內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究情況作了細(xì)致的綜述和分析,文獻(xiàn)介紹非常全面，表明作者對(duì)該領(lǐng)域研究現(xiàn)狀作了一定調(diào)研” ”申請(qǐng)書(shū)對(duì)研究中擬解決的問(wèn)題和可行性進(jìn)行了充分地分析論證，研究方案合理可行。 建議予以優(yōu)先資助“ 呵呵，從此可以看出，每個(gè)磚家花在看評(píng)審書(shū)的時(shí)間上不會(huì)超過(guò)15分鐘... 此外，所謂的磚家對(duì)相應(yīng)的領(lǐng)域，一無(wú)所知，所以只能泛泛而談。 給C的那個(gè)，連評(píng)審書(shū)估計(jì)都沒(méi)看，提的問(wèn)題我在申請(qǐng)書(shū)里反復(fù)說(shuō)明了。 沾我現(xiàn)在大牛老板的光，我也給我們專業(yè)的top conference和期刊申過(guò)稿，看過(guò)領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的牛人的評(píng)審意見(jiàn)。別人那叫一個(gè)認(rèn)真，不過(guò)給出很仔細(xì)的建議，就連語(yǔ)法錯(cuò)誤，圖里面的小錯(cuò)誤也都一一給指出來(lái)了。比如（有些信息刪除了）： ==================================== blalbal ...說(shuō)了一大堆技術(shù)意見(jiàn)，然后： The presentation is pretty good, but can still be improved. What follows is not complete, but it's pretty detailed. I'm giving you all this nit-picky feedback because I really like the paper, and I want it to be as perfect as possible. Please give the text a thorough editing pass to look for errors similar to what I list below. * The final paper will be in black and white, so you cannot refer to colors in the graphs (page x, Figure *******). Please refer to shades of gray. * In Section V subsection B, your explanation of how you chose the 10 applications is out of order and confusing. Please rework those two paragraphs so the reader isn't left wondering about how the 10 relate to the seven that you begin discussing in detail (things are clear by the end of the paragraph, but anything that confuses the reader gets in the way of the points you're trying to make). * There are far too few references for a paper on cache models. If you clean up your prose (eliminate some redundancy) and use less space for Figure x and Figure x (each would be readable even at the width of a single column), you will have room for more related work. Figure x could use much less space, too. You have many paragraphs with a single word on the last line -- modifying your prose to be more concise will also give you a much better layout (no more widows and orphans). * The references are inconsistent in format. Please give names consistently. Always give page numbers for conference and journal papers. Either always use a comma before the last author name in a list or always omit it. If you're going to give location information for one conference, you should do so for all (but I'd omit that -- easy enough to look up, and it's not essentially for tracking down a reference). Finally, I rather doubt that Harvard has a single system for all tech reports across the university. Please give the department and the report number. * Do not use references as if they were nouns in the text. They are not parts of speech! I know that many people do this, but it's a bad habit, and is completely illogical. Besides, if someone is citing your work, isn't it better to have your name show up in the text wrt that work? It's easier on the reader -- no need to flip back and forth to the references all the time. Again, you don't want to slow the reader down. * There are several punctuation errors, mostly due to extraneous or missing commas. - generally, you don't use a comma after "that", since it introduces a dependent clause. - funny spacing before period after "Out Boundary" on page x. - "i.e." and "e.g." are always parenthetical, which means that a comma has to come both before and after (the one after is consistently omitted in the paper). - there are some run-on sentences that are missing commas. "... is attenuated and the error of ******** increases by only 1%" needs a comma before the conjunction (page x), and "Table x, shows the errors ...." is two sentences strung together (page x). The latter needs a comma and a conjunction. - no comma should be placed between subject and verb, so "Table III, shows" needs no comma. This error occurs in several places. - "During the next time interval, T between the two accesses ...." either needs no comma or a comma after T, also. - no hyphen is used between an adverb and the adjective it modifies (only between two adjectives where the first modifies the second, and together they modify a noun), so "independently-collected" is wrong (lots of people -- even native speakers -- get this one wrong, usually when using the adverb "well", as in "well designed"  .- no comma is needed before "that", since it introduces a dependent clause. If what follows the comma is really parenthetical, you want to use "which", instead (page x). - "solving the *********, ...." needs no commas, since the information about what is being solved for is essential to the sentence (page x). * There are many grammatical errors with respect to agreement in number between subject and verb or between subject and a following pronoun. I'm including other typos/mistakes wrt singular/plural nouns, too. - (page x) "using a ... distributions" - (page x) "This data is" is wrong -- "data" is a plural noun (IEEE says so) - (page x) "The length of the arcs . . . are" -- "length" is singular, so "is" - (page x) "independent memory accesses streams" -- "access streams" is what you want - (page x) "based on the ... distribution" -- you're talking about more than one distribution, so make that noun plural - (page x) "xxx of the two xx and their proportion" has the same problem -- the two threads do not share one proportion of memory instructions - (pages xxx) "each ******** ... when they are********* ... including themselves" should use the singluar "it" and "itself" - "Table II, show" (no comma, noted above) needs a singular verb * "straightforward" is a single word (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/straightforward) * "with a factor of ..." should be "by a factor of ..." * "using sparse sampled" -- should be "sparsely" * "harder to predict an more important interesting to study" needs to be reworked (page x * "is itself is" (page x) * most of the places that you use "if" you really want "when". "if" applies to situations contrary to fact, and then what follows must be in the subjunctive. * "*********" should be followed by "of" * "pairs********* " should either be "pairs of ************" or just "**********", since you're talking about two applications, not four * (page *****) "solver i a *******************" -- typo for "in" ======================================= 試問(wèn)，國(guó)內(nèi)的磚家看評(píng)審書(shū)，能做到這一步么？ 另外說(shuō)說(shuō)我對(duì)自然科學(xué)基金的看法。我給老板寫(xiě)申請(qǐng)書(shū)之前，看了去年院里15篇申請(qǐng)下來(lái)的自然科學(xué)基金�？梢哉f(shuō)，任何一篇拿到美國(guó)來(lái)，結(jié)果都是不予資助。 個(gè)人覺(jué)得國(guó)內(nèi)的申請(qǐng)書(shū)有兩大缺點(diǎn)： 1. 喜歡搞新名詞，忽悠 2. 內(nèi)容假大空 3. 沒(méi)有新意 ======================================= 對(duì)于青椒的建議是，一開(kāi)以跟蹤國(guó)外的研究為主�？纯茨銈冾I(lǐng)域的最好的5個(gè)研究小組都做些什么，不要盲目的跟國(guó)內(nèi)的熱點(diǎn)。另外，研究方法，內(nèi)容有創(chuàng)新是最重要的，不要把自己的申請(qǐng)書(shū)寫(xiě)成工程性的研究。 ============================================= 我發(fā)文的目的不是顯擺，而是希望青椒們不要太把這些磚家當(dāng)回事，只要是能夠跟蹤哦國(guó)際的前沿，那在國(guó)內(nèi)就是創(chuàng)新了。我也深?lèi)和唇^國(guó)內(nèi)的學(xué)霸... 祝大家好運(yùn)吧。 |
回復(fù)此樓» 猜你喜歡
299求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
286分人工智能專業(yè)請(qǐng)求調(diào)劑愿意跨考！
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
279求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
336求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
286求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
一志愿華中科技大學(xué)071000，求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
279分求調(diào)劑 一志愿211
已經(jīng)有14人回復(fù)
-
332求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
0856材料專碩353求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
-
材料學(xué)學(xué)碩080502 337求調(diào)劑-一志愿華中科技大學(xué)
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:
- 大家?guī)头治鲆幌�，�?guó)外導(dǎo)師這樣回復(fù)有沒(méi)有希望得到博后資助？謝謝！
已經(jīng)有61人回復(fù)
- 27歲海歸女碩，各位指點(diǎn)考博迷茫�。∨拇u也歡迎
已經(jīng)有36人回復(fù)
- 選擇了，我太軟弱了嗎
已經(jīng)有37人回復(fù)
- 強(qiáng)烈鄙視那些提出“該項(xiàng)目是前期工作的延續(xù)和提高”而不予資助的評(píng)審
已經(jīng)有48人回復(fù)
- 請(qǐng)專家不要成為磚家
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
pmsl
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
院士
- 應(yīng)助: 7 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 13448.2
- 散金: 3843
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 1985
- 在線: 404.3小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 423152
- 注冊(cè): 2007-07-21
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 軍事教育學(xué)
2樓2010-08-27 20:49:52
htchen
木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1440.7
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 764
- 在線: 149.1小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 314308
- 注冊(cè): 2007-02-25
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 凝聚態(tài)物理
3樓2010-08-27 21:05:37
huasheng75
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1323.7
- 散金: 10
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 317
- 在線: 157.7小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 940459
- 注冊(cè): 2010-01-11
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 機(jī)器人學(xué)及機(jī)器人技術(shù)
4樓2010-08-27 21:14:41
goodluckxie
金蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 2139.2
- 帖子: 864
- 在線: 20.3小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 400805
- 注冊(cè): 2007-06-13
- 專業(yè): 金融工程
5樓2010-08-27 21:17:20
jjg2010
木蟲(chóng) (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 4649.4
- 帖子: 52
- 在線: 22小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 969996
- 注冊(cè): 2010-03-13
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 信息系統(tǒng)與管理
6樓2010-08-27 21:28:28
7樓2010-08-27 22:25:55
★
小木蟲(chóng)(金幣+0.5):給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖交流
小木蟲(chóng)(金幣+0.5):給個(gè)紅包，謝謝回帖交流
 |
8樓2010-08-27 22:28:14
one23
木蟲(chóng) (著名寫(xiě)手)
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 3087.4
- 帖子: 2567
- 在線: 154.2小時(shí)
- 蟲(chóng)號(hào): 586983
- 注冊(cè): 2008-08-15
- 專業(yè): 中國(guó)少數(shù)民族語(yǔ)言文字
9樓2010-08-27 22:38:51
10樓2010-08-27 22:54:58
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 iamgreat 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856 271求調(diào)劑 +3 | 展信悅_ 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +4 | chuanzhu川燭 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)319求調(diào)劑 +7 | 錦鯉0909 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 307求調(diào)劑 +3 | wyyyqx 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +3 | Ma_xt 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 280求調(diào)劑 +7 | 咕嚕曉曉 2026-03-18 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京理工大學(xué)085701資源與環(huán)境302分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 葵梓衛(wèi)隊(duì) 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 323求調(diào)劑 +3 | 洼小桶 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +9 | 想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 中南大學(xué)化學(xué)學(xué)碩337求調(diào)劑 +3 | niko- 2026-03-19 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +4 | Stella_Yao 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉林大學(xué)材料學(xué)碩321求調(diào)劑 +11 | Ymlll 2026-03-18 | 15/750 |
|
|
|
[基金申請(qǐng)]
學(xué)校已經(jīng)提交到NSFC，還能修改嗎？
 40+4
|
babangida 2026-03-19 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085410人工智能專碩317求調(diào)劑（0854都可以） +4 | xbxudjdn 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本科鄭州大學(xué)物理學(xué)院，一志愿華科070200學(xué)碩，346求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我不是一根蔥 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +11 | 冬十三 2026-03-15 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0854可跨調(diào)劑，一作一項(xiàng)核心論文五項(xiàng)專利，省、國(guó)級(jí)證書(shū)40+數(shù)一英一287 +8 | 小李0854 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 293求調(diào)劑 +11 | zjl的號(hào) 2026-03-16 | 16/800 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿，福州大學(xué)材料專碩339分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 木子momo青爭(zhēng) 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070305求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|