 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2299 | 回復: 19 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
[交流]
對所謂磚家也不要太在意 已有17人參與
|
|||
|
本人現(xiàn)在美國讀博士，前段時間給碩士老板寫了個本子，前后花了2個晚上的時間。因為是作為應(yīng)付差事來寫的（主要是考慮到將來要回國的話，還得有人罩著），很多圖都懶得畫了。最后給報銷了臺筆記本，呵呵，真夠廉價的。 碩士老板是985院校老師，從來沒有申到自然科學基金，其他基金好像不少。最后結(jié)果，3A1B1C 資助60多萬。至于他是不是找關(guān)系我就不知道了，我感覺應(yīng)該是沒那么大的能量。因為他也不是什么磚家，當初他的博士論文還是我讀碩士的時候給他寫的。 今天收到評審意見，我笑了。這些所謂磚家的評審意見，要是從conference reviewer的角度來說，狗屁都不是�；旧戏悍憾�， 比如最后的結(jié)論基本上是： “課題對該國內(nèi)外相關(guān)研究情況作了細致的綜述和分析,文獻介紹非常全面，表明作者對該領(lǐng)域研究現(xiàn)狀作了一定調(diào)研” ”申請書對研究中擬解決的問題和可行性進行了充分地分析論證，研究方案合理可行。 建議予以優(yōu)先資助“ 呵呵，從此可以看出，每個磚家花在看評審書的時間上不會超過15分鐘... 此外，所謂的磚家對相應(yīng)的領(lǐng)域，一無所知，所以只能泛泛而談。 給C的那個，連評審書估計都沒看，提的問題我在申請書里反復說明了。 沾我現(xiàn)在大牛老板的光，我也給我們專業(yè)的top conference和期刊申過稿，看過領(lǐng)域內(nèi)的牛人的評審意見。別人那叫一個認真，不過給出很仔細的建議，就連語法錯誤，圖里面的小錯誤也都一一給指出來了。比如（有些信息刪除了）： ==================================== blalbal ...說了一大堆技術(shù)意見，然后： The presentation is pretty good, but can still be improved. What follows is not complete, but it's pretty detailed. I'm giving you all this nit-picky feedback because I really like the paper, and I want it to be as perfect as possible. Please give the text a thorough editing pass to look for errors similar to what I list below. * The final paper will be in black and white, so you cannot refer to colors in the graphs (page x, Figure *******). Please refer to shades of gray. * In Section V subsection B, your explanation of how you chose the 10 applications is out of order and confusing. Please rework those two paragraphs so the reader isn't left wondering about how the 10 relate to the seven that you begin discussing in detail (things are clear by the end of the paragraph, but anything that confuses the reader gets in the way of the points you're trying to make). * There are far too few references for a paper on cache models. If you clean up your prose (eliminate some redundancy) and use less space for Figure x and Figure x (each would be readable even at the width of a single column), you will have room for more related work. Figure x could use much less space, too. You have many paragraphs with a single word on the last line -- modifying your prose to be more concise will also give you a much better layout (no more widows and orphans). * The references are inconsistent in format. Please give names consistently. Always give page numbers for conference and journal papers. Either always use a comma before the last author name in a list or always omit it. If you're going to give location information for one conference, you should do so for all (but I'd omit that -- easy enough to look up, and it's not essentially for tracking down a reference). Finally, I rather doubt that Harvard has a single system for all tech reports across the university. Please give the department and the report number. * Do not use references as if they were nouns in the text. They are not parts of speech! I know that many people do this, but it's a bad habit, and is completely illogical. Besides, if someone is citing your work, isn't it better to have your name show up in the text wrt that work? It's easier on the reader -- no need to flip back and forth to the references all the time. Again, you don't want to slow the reader down. * There are several punctuation errors, mostly due to extraneous or missing commas. - generally, you don't use a comma after "that", since it introduces a dependent clause. - funny spacing before period after "Out Boundary" on page x. - "i.e." and "e.g." are always parenthetical, which means that a comma has to come both before and after (the one after is consistently omitted in the paper). - there are some run-on sentences that are missing commas. "... is attenuated and the error of ******** increases by only 1%" needs a comma before the conjunction (page x), and "Table x, shows the errors ...." is two sentences strung together (page x). The latter needs a comma and a conjunction. - no comma should be placed between subject and verb, so "Table III, shows" needs no comma. This error occurs in several places. - "During the next time interval, T between the two accesses ...." either needs no comma or a comma after T, also. - no hyphen is used between an adverb and the adjective it modifies (only between two adjectives where the first modifies the second, and together they modify a noun), so "independently-collected" is wrong (lots of people -- even native speakers -- get this one wrong, usually when using the adverb "well", as in "well designed"  .- no comma is needed before "that", since it introduces a dependent clause. If what follows the comma is really parenthetical, you want to use "which", instead (page x). - "solving the *********, ...." needs no commas, since the information about what is being solved for is essential to the sentence (page x). * There are many grammatical errors with respect to agreement in number between subject and verb or between subject and a following pronoun. I'm including other typos/mistakes wrt singular/plural nouns, too. - (page x) "using a ... distributions" - (page x) "This data is" is wrong -- "data" is a plural noun (IEEE says so) - (page x) "The length of the arcs . . . are" -- "length" is singular, so "is" - (page x) "independent memory accesses streams" -- "access streams" is what you want - (page x) "based on the ... distribution" -- you're talking about more than one distribution, so make that noun plural - (page x) "xxx of the two xx and their proportion" has the same problem -- the two threads do not share one proportion of memory instructions - (pages xxx) "each ******** ... when they are********* ... including themselves" should use the singluar "it" and "itself" - "Table II, show" (no comma, noted above) needs a singular verb * "straightforward" is a single word (http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/straightforward) * "with a factor of ..." should be "by a factor of ..." * "using sparse sampled" -- should be "sparsely" * "harder to predict an more important interesting to study" needs to be reworked (page x * "is itself is" (page x) * most of the places that you use "if" you really want "when". "if" applies to situations contrary to fact, and then what follows must be in the subjunctive. * "*********" should be followed by "of" * "pairs********* " should either be "pairs of ************" or just "**********", since you're talking about two applications, not four * (page *****) "solver i a *******************" -- typo for "in" ======================================= 試問，國內(nèi)的磚家看評審書，能做到這一步么？ 另外說說我對自然科學基金的看法。我給老板寫申請書之前，看了去年院里15篇申請下來的自然科學基金。可以說，任何一篇拿到美國來，結(jié)果都是不予資助。 個人覺得國內(nèi)的申請書有兩大缺點： 1. 喜歡搞新名詞，忽悠 2. 內(nèi)容假大空 3. 沒有新意 ======================================= 對于青椒的建議是，一開以跟蹤國外的研究為主�？纯茨銈冾I(lǐng)域的最好的5個研究小組都做些什么，不要盲目的跟國內(nèi)的熱點。另外，研究方法，內(nèi)容有創(chuàng)新是最重要的，不要把自己的申請書寫成工程性的研究。 ============================================= 我發(fā)文的目的不是顯擺，而是希望青椒們不要太把這些磚家當回事，只要是能夠跟蹤哦國際的前沿，那在國內(nèi)就是創(chuàng)新了。我也深惡痛絕國內(nèi)的學霸... 祝大家好運吧。 |
回復此樓» 猜你喜歡
找調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有3人回復
-
一志愿南昌大學324求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有7人回復
-
材料專碩322分
已經(jīng)有5人回復
-
材料與化工（0856）304求B區(qū)調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有12人回復
-
材料調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有10人回復
-
省雙一流重點一本大學招收調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
321求調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有6人回復
-
288求調(diào)劑 一志愿哈工大 材料與化工
已經(jīng)有26人回復
-
材料調(diào)劑
已經(jīng)有5人回復
-
一志愿北交大材料工程總分358
已經(jīng)有4人回復
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 大家?guī)头治鲆幌�，國外導師這樣回復有沒有希望得到博后資助？謝謝！
已經(jīng)有61人回復
- 27歲海歸女碩，各位指點考博迷茫��！拍磚也歡迎
已經(jīng)有36人回復
- 選擇了，我太軟弱了嗎
已經(jīng)有37人回復
- 強烈鄙視那些提出“該項目是前期工作的延續(xù)和提高”而不予資助的評審
已經(jīng)有48人回復
- 請專家不要成為磚家
已經(jīng)有20人回復
htchen
主管區(qū)長
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1440.7
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 764
- 在線: 149.1小時
- 蟲號: 314308
- 注冊: 2007-02-25
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 凝聚態(tài)物理
3樓2010-08-27 21:05:37
pmsl
主管區(qū)長
院士
- 應(yīng)助: 7 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 13448.2
- 散金: 3843
- 紅花: 2
- 帖子: 1985
- 在線: 404.3小時
- 蟲號: 423152
- 注冊: 2007-07-21
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 軍事教育學
2樓2010-08-27 20:49:52
huasheng75
超級版主
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1323.7
- 散金: 10
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 317
- 在線: 157.7小時
- 蟲號: 940459
- 注冊: 2010-01-11
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 機器人學及機器人技術(shù)
4樓2010-08-27 21:14:41
one23
實習版主
- 應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 3087.4
- 帖子: 2567
- 在線: 154.2小時
- 蟲號: 586983
- 注冊: 2008-08-15
- 專業(yè): 中國少數(shù)民族語言文字
9樓2010-08-27 22:38:51
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +5 | AZMK 2026-04-01 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學 ，080500材料科學與工程學碩 +10 | @taotao 2026-03-31 | 11/550 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0805求調(diào)劑 +6 | 是水分 2026-03-31 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 初試301，代碼085701環(huán)境工程，本碩一致，四六級已過，有二區(qū)一作，共發(fā)表5篇論文 +3 | axibli 2026-04-01 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料專業(yè)調(diào)劑 +4 | 啦啦啦哭 2026-03-31 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703一志愿南師大334求調(diào)劑 +3 | seven7yu 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東理工大學，080500學碩，317分，求調(diào)劑 +9 | s1145 2026-03-31 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東師范大學有機化學專業(yè)，初試351分，復試被刷求調(diào)劑! +9 | 真名有冰 2026-03-29 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 343求調(diào)劑 +8 | 愛羈絆 2026-03-28 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | Faune 2026-03-30 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑求院校招收 +7 | 鶴鯨鴿 2026-03-28 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-31 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 福建理工大學材料學院先進合金團隊招收考研調(diào)劑學生 +3 | 大華金商都 2026-03-30 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 297 地理學070500 復試求調(diào)劑 +3 | 小圓圈圈ooo 2026-03-30 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中南大學化學0703總分337求調(diào)劑 +6 | niko- 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 356求調(diào)劑 +4 | gysy?s?a 2026-03-28 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 266求調(diào)劑 +11 | 陽陽哇塞 2026-03-27 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0856調(diào)劑 +5 | 求求讓我有書讀?/a> 2026-03-26 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +4 | lim0922 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 調(diào)劑 +4 | 柚柚yoyo 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|