| 24小時(shí)熱門(mén)版塊排行榜 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2163 | 回復(fù): 9 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
thinking木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
[交流]
編輯發(fā)錯(cuò)審稿意見(jiàn),但文章無(wú)進(jìn)展,如何處理 已有5人參與
|
||
| 一審回來(lái),期刊給的意見(jiàn)是小修,其中A評(píng)價(jià)很高,建議發(fā)表,B評(píng)價(jià)一般,提出了很多問(wèn)題,但是仔細(xì)一看,B的意見(jiàn)根本不是我文章的,然后寫(xiě)信說(shuō)明,主編向本人致歉,并將正確審稿意見(jiàn)發(fā)給我,而此意見(jiàn)評(píng)價(jià)很低,建議拒掉。一般這種情況,編輯應(yīng)該會(huì)找第三人審稿,因此,我寫(xiě)信問(wèn)編輯,說(shuō)期刊的意見(jiàn)是什么,直接拒、大修還是第三人審?不過(guò)一直沒(méi)有回信,從網(wǎng)上查詢文章?tīng)顟B(tài)與一審結(jié)果一模一樣(包括錯(cuò)誤的意見(jiàn)),請(qǐng)教下大家,這種情況是什么意思,文章基本沒(méi)戲了?有沒(méi)有必要再寫(xiě)封信問(wèn)下。 |
木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
至尊木蟲(chóng) (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
|
比這里的第一個(gè)審稿人的意見(jiàn)還嚴(yán)重?那就發(fā)出來(lái)看看! http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2387663 |
木蟲(chóng) (正式寫(xiě)手)
|
This paper describes numerical results obtained by the authors of the XXX. This is an extensively studied problem both numerically and experimentally. The difficulty for the authors in this case is to bring something new or innovative to our understanding of the problem. Unfortunately, the manuscript as well as the presented research fails to do so. Despite the fact that the authors have gone through English edition of their manuscript, important parts of the papers are very poorly written and it is sometimes quite difficult to understand the points made and the authors appear to make vague, imprecise, qualitative comments to describe the method and the already known results, which do not teach the reader anything new about the phenomena. The manuscript describes numerical results obtained a commercial code. The assumptions of the code, the equations it solves, its limits of application, its validity for the problem at hand, gridding used, convergence, and so on, are not addressed or described in any fashion. The authors instead just describe results obtained with a code they have not developed, describe unimportant minute details and discuss already known results from either the references cited by the manuscript authors or by other published studies (e.g. see additional references at the end of this review). The following are some additional detailed comments: (以下有7條具體內(nèi)容,前六條都是針對(duì)文中內(nèi)容的,比較好回答,但最后一條說(shuō)結(jié)論很早就知道了,其實(shí)還是有差異的...) In conclusion, I unfortunately did not learn anything reading this manuscript and cannot therefore recommend it to the permanent literature. I therefore recommend rejection. |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 298求調(diào)劑 +8 | 上岸6666@ 2026-03-20 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +6 | Zhao anqi 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0856材料專碩353求調(diào)劑 +4 | NIFFFfff 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601調(diào)劑 358分 +3 | zzzzggh 2026-03-20 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械專碩299求調(diào)劑至材料 +3 | kkcoco25 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿天津大學(xué)化學(xué)工藝專業(yè)(081702)315分求調(diào)劑 +12 | yangfz 2026-03-17 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 324分 085600材料化工求調(diào)劑 +4 | llllkkkhh 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩英一數(shù)二306 +7 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +9 | 何潤(rùn)采123 2026-03-18 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +7 | 司空. 2026-03-18 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南京理工大學(xué)085701資源與環(huán)境302分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 葵梓衛(wèi)隊(duì) 2026-03-18 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ^O^乜 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] A區(qū)線材料學(xué)調(diào)劑 +5 | 周周無(wú)極 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 298-一志愿中國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)-求調(diào)劑 +9 | 手機(jī)用戶 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)碩318求調(diào)劑 +5 | February_Feb 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +6 | lemonzzn 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 【同濟(jì)軟件】軟件(085405)考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2026eternal 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 收復(fù)試調(diào)劑生 +4 | 雨后秋荷 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 有沒(méi)有道鐵/土木的想調(diào)劑南林,給自己招師弟中~ +3 | TqlXswl 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|