| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2169 | 回復(fù): 9 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
thinking木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[交流]
編輯發(fā)錯(cuò)審稿意見,但文章無進(jìn)展,如何處理 已有5人參與
|
||
| 一審回來,期刊給的意見是小修,其中A評(píng)價(jià)很高,建議發(fā)表,B評(píng)價(jià)一般,提出了很多問題,但是仔細(xì)一看,B的意見根本不是我文章的,然后寫信說明,主編向本人致歉,并將正確審稿意見發(fā)給我,而此意見評(píng)價(jià)很低,建議拒掉。一般這種情況,編輯應(yīng)該會(huì)找第三人審稿,因此,我寫信問編輯,說期刊的意見是什么,直接拒、大修還是第三人審?不過一直沒有回信,從網(wǎng)上查詢文章狀態(tài)與一審結(jié)果一模一樣(包括錯(cuò)誤的意見),請(qǐng)教下大家,這種情況是什么意思,文章基本沒戲了?有沒有必要再寫封信問下。 |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
|
比這里的第一個(gè)審稿人的意見還嚴(yán)重?那就發(fā)出來看看! http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=2387663 |
至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)
IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家
木蟲 (正式寫手)
木蟲 (正式寫手)
|
This paper describes numerical results obtained by the authors of the XXX. This is an extensively studied problem both numerically and experimentally. The difficulty for the authors in this case is to bring something new or innovative to our understanding of the problem. Unfortunately, the manuscript as well as the presented research fails to do so. Despite the fact that the authors have gone through English edition of their manuscript, important parts of the papers are very poorly written and it is sometimes quite difficult to understand the points made and the authors appear to make vague, imprecise, qualitative comments to describe the method and the already known results, which do not teach the reader anything new about the phenomena. The manuscript describes numerical results obtained a commercial code. The assumptions of the code, the equations it solves, its limits of application, its validity for the problem at hand, gridding used, convergence, and so on, are not addressed or described in any fashion. The authors instead just describe results obtained with a code they have not developed, describe unimportant minute details and discuss already known results from either the references cited by the manuscript authors or by other published studies (e.g. see additional references at the end of this review). The following are some additional detailed comments: (以下有7條具體內(nèi)容,前六條都是針對(duì)文中內(nèi)容的,比較好回答,但最后一條說結(jié)論很早就知道了,其實(shí)還是有差異的...) In conclusion, I unfortunately did not learn anything reading this manuscript and cannot therefore recommend it to the permanent literature. I therefore recommend rejection. |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 327求調(diào)劑 +6 | 汲亦昊 2026-03-29 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 349求調(diào)劑 +6 | 李木子啊哈哈 2026-03-25 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 375求調(diào)劑 +4 | 雨夏整夜 2026-03-29 | 4/200 |
|
|
[碩博家園] 招收生物學(xué)/細(xì)胞生物學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | IceGuo 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 生物學(xué)學(xué)碩,一志愿湖南大學(xué),初試成績338 +6 | YYYYYNNNNN 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 071000生物學(xué)求調(diào)劑,初試成績343 +7 | 小小甜面團(tuán) 2026-03-25 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 347求調(diào)劑 +3 | 山頂見α 2026-03-25 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +9 | 奶油草莓. 2026-03-22 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 322求調(diào)劑 +5 | 舊吢 2026-03-24 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑 +7 | 嗯滴的基本都 2026-03-27 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 材料292調(diào)劑 +12 | 橘頌思美人 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 085600,材料與化工321分調(diào)劑 +4 | 大饞小子 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)308分求調(diào)劑 +8 | 你好明天你好 2026-03-23 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑。有半年電池和半年高分子實(shí)習(xí)經(jīng)歷 +10 | 材料學(xué)257求調(diào)劑 2026-03-23 | 11/550 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 林之夕 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 336材料求調(diào)劑 +7 | 陳瀅瑩 2026-03-26 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 335 分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拒絕冷暴力 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 上海電力大學(xué)材料防護(hù)與新材料重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室招收調(diào)劑研究生(材料、化學(xué)、電化學(xué),環(huán)境) +4 | 我愛學(xué)電池 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研]
|
13659058978 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑 +7 | jhybd 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|