| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 969 | 回復(fù): 3 | |||
又個(gè)七年木蟲 (著名寫手)
|
[交流]
這樣的修改意見是積極的嗎? 已有2人參與
|
|
各位蟲友大家好啊: 這次投了一篇文章到NEW journal of chemistry,終于等到了消息,但我總感覺到兇多吉少,以前也碰見過大修的狀況,但感覺都不如這一次更嚴(yán)峻,小弟只有求助各位大俠了,看看是個(gè)什么情況,畢竟我現(xiàn)在在準(zhǔn)備十月9號(hào)的雅思考試,肯定沒那多精力搞論文了,但是這也是我放的心血最多的一篇論文了,小弟拜謝各位了: 以下是修改意見,貌似第一個(gè)審稿人就直接拒掉了 In view of the criticisms of the reviewers, I must decline the manuscript for publication in New Journal of Chemistry at this time. However, a new manuscript may be submitted which takes into consideration these comments and which resolves the problems raised by the reviewers. Please note that resubmitting your manuscript does not guarantee eventual acceptance, and that your resubmission will be subject to re-review by the reviewers before a decision is taken. Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 1 Comments to the Author The manuscript describes a facile, environmentally friendly hydrothermal route with tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) as surfactant to prepare PbS macrostructures. The morphology of the final product can be easily controlled by changing the reaction parameters. Furthermore, the proposed formation mechanism and optical property of the PbS macrostructures are also presented. Unfortunately, there are still left many unclear questions in the manuscript. In addition, the contents of the manuscript lack novelty, logicality and significance. Specifically, there are some technical problems as listed below. (1) The language is OK but still needs some improvement. There are also some spelling errors, such as Page 7: line 3“CBAB”; Page 10: last line “PS”; Page 16: line 8“smoot”. (2) The authors claimed that the biggest advantage is to use TBAB as surfactant, and it has similar chemical structure with CTAB. So what’s the difference between them on manipulating the morphology of PbS crystals? Please cite reference or discuss about it. (3) As shown in Figure 2e, many nanocubes are observed through the magnified TEM image. Why these nanoparticles could exist? The authors just said that they prepared two different products from the same reaction process instead of explaining the reason and the reaction process is not reasonable. (4) Page 10: line 25“……as shown in Figure 5e.” The curve and labeling isn't matching in Figure 5. (5) The manuscript emphasizes on the adsorption and sustained release of S2+ by TBAB. However, the explanation of molecular structure is not clear in Figure 8. Even the chemical reaction equation can't explain how TBAB release of S2+? In conclusion, this manuscript does not reach the standard of New Journal of Chemistry. I do not recommend it for publication in New Journal of Chemistry. Referee: 2 Comments to the Author The manuscript describes the synthesis of hierarchical structures of PbS by employing a hydrothermal method. A surfactant, TBAB is used for sustained release of sulfide ions, which the authors claim to be crucial for the control of material architecture. The reaction product is analyzed by various microscopic and spectroscopic techniques. Authors varied the TBAB concentrations and other experimental parameters systematically and investigated its effect on morphology. The product morphology is not very attractive and there are many reports in the literature showing better control of morphology. The prospect of encasing H2S inside the precursor is interesting, and should be pursued by experimental verification. Therefore this part should be more convincingly stated. The important point in the article is the role of different reactants and the growth mechanism. The following questions should be more clearly addressed: 1. Why branching takes place at certain concentrations? What is the role of surfactant in branching? 2. How can the size of the product be reduced in order to obtain nanostructures? 3. If possible, a schematic should be provided to illustrate the growth mechanism. 4. The optical properties are rather preliminary and are not relevant to the study and therefore should be removed. There are several careless mistakes such as CTAB should be TBAB in line 3 of the section ‘effect of TBAB’. The manuscript should be accepted upon suitable modification by the authors. |
木蟲 (著名寫手)
| 4 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 08工科 320總分 求調(diào)劑 +8 | 梨花珞晚風(fēng) 2026-03-17 | 8/400 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +4 | 來好運(yùn)來來來 2026-03-22 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +9 | 簡單點(diǎn)0 2026-03-17 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑0854 +3 | assdll 2026-03-21 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 306求調(diào)劑 +4 | chuanzhu川燭 2026-03-18 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)319求調(diào)劑 +7 | 錦鯉0909 2026-03-17 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 083200學(xué)碩321分一志愿暨南大學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +3 | innocenceF 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 初始318分求調(diào)劑(有工作經(jīng)驗(yàn)) +3 | 1911236844 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中國石油大學(xué)(華東) 本科齊魯工業(yè)大學(xué) +3 | 石能偉 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華中科技大學(xué),080502,354分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 守候夕陽CF 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿蘇州大學(xué)材料求調(diào)劑,總分315(英一) +5 | sbdksD 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 329求調(diào)劑 +9 | 想上學(xué)吖吖 2026-03-19 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑一志愿南京航空航天大學(xué)289分 +3 | @taotao 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +6 | 懷瑾握瑜l 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿 南京航空航天大學(xué)大學(xué) ,080500材料科學(xué)與工程學(xué)碩 +5 | @taotao 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研]
|
不想起名字112 2026-03-19 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程專碩調(diào)劑 +5 | 204818@lcx 2026-03-17 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 344求調(diào)劑 +6 | knight344 2026-03-16 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 【同濟(jì)軟件】軟件(085405)考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2026eternal 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085601求調(diào)劑 +4 | Du.11 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|