| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 2436 | 回復(fù): 7 | ||||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖,點(diǎn)擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | ||||
[交流]
請(qǐng)教organic letter 如何申訴?
|
||||
|
請(qǐng)教各位高手, 稿件被拒,但是覺得拒的不合理,如何進(jìn)行organic letter 申訴?在什么條件下可以申訴?申訴應(yīng)該注意那些問(wèn)題? [ Last edited by 小皮憨妮8692 on 2011-1-16 at 15:50 ] |
淘帖 |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/190
+1/89
+1/49
+1/33
+1/32
+1/29
+1/22
+3/19
+1/18
+1/13
+1/11
+1/9
+1/7
+1/7
+1/7
+1/6
+1/6
+1/5
+1/5
+1/5
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
|
[quote]Originally posted by 小皮憨妮8692 at 2011-01-16 12:16:28: 想跟您問(wèn)下您有沒有過(guò)申訴經(jīng)歷?我是新手,不是很懂。要不要一一的回復(fù)審稿人的意見?原稿件中要不要修改,比如說(shuō)要加入的數(shù)據(jù),或者是語(yǔ)法或格式的修改這樣的?多謝!如果方便的話,能不能給我發(fā)份申訴信?十分 ... [/q 我沒有申述過(guò)! 給你一些模板吧,謹(jǐn)慎使用: Dear Editor Thank you and the reviewers very much for your helpful and kindly comments on our manuscript titled "…" . However, we think that your decision on refusing publication of this work in your journal is cursory, inappropriate and disappointing. At first, this work has its important practice significance and application values in … Unfortunately, …. We carried out this work in order to … Second, Journal of … as the first-rate journal in … should accept the publication of the important work in this journal. … Third, this work related to … is within the scope of this journal. We believe that this paper is suitable for the journal, because the Journal publishes research results dealing with… with a focus on original research representing complete studies, rather than incremental studies, and the topics covered include …, in particular, it covers … In a word, we mightily ask you to reconsider the publication of this work in your journal, and hope that you can make a positive decision which is beneficial to…in the world and can improve the quality of the manuscript according to the comments of the reviewers. With best wishes, Sincerely, … 作者: zhxd86 發(fā)布日期: 2008-10-27 Dear editor: Author would like to thank reviewing the manuscript by referee. Indded, some unnecessary spelling error is existed, and author feel embarrassed. This can due to careless omission and poor english. However,auther feel that the revised chance should be given for improving the manusript, because author conceive that the paper quality is not so bad. Author has read the suggestions from the reviewer, and conceive that the paper can be revised as following: 1.The more clear figure. 2.Improving the english. 3.The more calculated details. 4.Rewriten the Abstract and Conclusions. Author hope that the editor can give the revised chance,and give some appropriate tolerance for the young and non-native author. After all, the most important is paper quality. Meanwhile, author suggest that the e-mail should also be sent to reviewer. Thank your very much. Best Regards 作者: woodbeing 發(fā)布日期: 2008-10-27 偶最近自己寫的,申述是成功了。但文章還在審稿中。。。 Dear editor, This mail comes to request a chance for reconsidering our manuscript (No. XXX) submitted to the Journal of Applied Physics. "Name of your manuscript" (No. XXX) Our manuscript can be roughly divided into two parts, XX and XX, respectively. The first part, as evaluated by the referee, "is a worthwhile effort". For the second part, the referee pointed out three questions on the completeness of the physical explanation of our data. As to the three questions, we admit that one or two are indeed neglected by us in the original manuscript and following the referee's advice we have made some substantial revisions. After the revisions, we are sure, we have well handled all the three questions in the report and the referee will be ready to accept the new manuscript. The recommendation of the original manuscript from the referee is "Major Revision". Besides, at the end of the report his/her thinks "After that (address the three questions) the revised manuscript can be reviewed again to determine its suitability for publication." Together with the positive evaluation of the first part of our manuscript, all of these deliver us the information that the referee is expecting our revised manuscript. Thus, we ask for an new evaluation from the original referee for the revised version. We are very confident of the quality of the new manuscript and believe that it now meets the standard of the Journal of Applied Physics. Please note that the editor has rejected our original manuscript and the online submission for revised version does not show up. If you are willing to take our request and send our revised version to the original referee, please tell us how to submit the revised version. Dear Editor, As the corresponding author, I received an e-mail which informed me that our manuscript (ID xxxxxxx) has been rejected. A referee’s report, as a standard procedure, has been attached to it. I have not the slightest grudge against the rejection. However, the referee’s report is quite unconvincing, or, if I may say, somewhat irresponsible. I understand that Inorganic Chemistry is an honorable organization which has a distinct reputation of being most conscientious toward all the submissions around the world. Those careless remarks in the report might jeopardize the good image which Inorganic Chemistry has been well upholding. So I consider it a self-imposed obligation to point it out. Just for the sake of argument, please allow me to cite the second referee's report below. Quote: (1)xxxx (2)xxxxx .................. There are mainly 3 arguments against our manuscript. (1)xxxxx (2)xxxx ...... It’s absurd for the referee to accuse us for the error we are striving to correct, and it’s also narrow-minded for him to deny any other theories that he hasn’t met or could not comprehend. So, I’m not content with the remarks this referee made. Since I haven’t found a second referee who can provide some potent opinions, I am hereby appealing for reconsideration. Please appoint us a new unbiased referee. Thank you very much for your patience and understanding. |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料學(xué)求調(diào)劑 +5 | Stella_Yao 2026-03-20 | 5/250 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 0856材料專碩353求調(diào)劑 +6 | NIFFFfff 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿華東理工大學(xué)081700,初試分?jǐn)?shù)271 +5 | kotoko_ik 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿國(guó)科過(guò)程所081700,274求調(diào)劑 +3 | 三水研0水立方 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 335分 | 材料與化工專碩 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷 +4 | cccchenso 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +3 | yanzhixue111 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 269求調(diào)劑 +4 | 我想讀研11 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境,總分308求調(diào)劑 +7 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-23 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | ALULU4408 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 316求調(diào)劑 +7 | 梁茜雯 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 291求調(diào)劑 +5 | 孅華 2026-03-22 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 276求調(diào)劑 +3 | YNRYG 2026-03-21 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 317求調(diào)劑 +12 | 申子申申 2026-03-19 | 18/900 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +10 | Faune 2026-03-21 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 南昌大學(xué)材料專碩311分求調(diào)劑 +6 | 77chaselx 2026-03-20 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿重慶大學(xué)085700資源與環(huán)境專碩,總分308求調(diào)劑 +3 | 墨墨漠 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑求學(xué)校推薦 +3 | 伯樂29 2026-03-18 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿蘇州大學(xué)材料求調(diào)劑,總分315(英一) +5 | sbdksD 2026-03-19 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 290求調(diào)劑 +7 | ^O^乜 2026-03-19 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 【同濟(jì)軟件】軟件(085405)考研求調(diào)劑 +3 | 2026eternal 2026-03-18 | 3/150 |
|