| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1592 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
yinhailiang木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
catalysis letter 拒稿后能申訴么? 已有5人參與
|
|
向catalysis letter投一篇催化脫硫的稿件,審稿后主編給拒了,但是兩個(gè)審稿人的意見都是修改后接收阿,這種情況下申訴有用么?各位有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的專家給個(gè)建議吧。另外,主編參考審稿人的意見說我的稿子原創(chuàng)性不強(qiáng),但是兩位審稿專家都沒有提出這樣的問題啊,是不是主編搞錯(cuò)稿件了? 從審稿人意見看的話,最大就是大修,意見都不尖銳。 Dear Dr. xxx: Enclosed please find the comments of the reviewers on your manuscript entitled "xxx". They both recommend against publication of the manuscript in its present form. They find that the originality is not sufficently strong for Catalysis Letters and that there are a a number of additional peices of work that need to be done to make this acceptable. I must uphold the judgment of the referees and decline the publication of the paper in Catalysis Letters at this time. With best regards, Prof. Andrew Gellman Catalysis Letters gellman@cmu.edu Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 1 Comments to the Author The paper describes synthesis and characterization xxx with the application in HDS and HDN. The paper is of good quality with respect to preparation and characterization of catalysts. However there are some concern and these are follows: 1) xxx. 2) It would be useful if authors measure the dispersion of metals using H2 chemisorption technique. It is well known that this technique can provide valuable information regarding the active site density. In addition, activity of two catalysts should be also determined in terms of turnover number. 3) In order to determine the exact coordination of molybdenum species, authors should characterized catalysts using diffuse reflectance UV–visible Spectroscopy. In conclusion, the manuscript can be published, if authors address above concerns in their revised manuscript. Referee: 2 Comments to the Author In this manuscript, author explored xxx. Authors’ work has exhibited sufficient contribution in this field to publish in Catalysis Letter. After some revision as following problems, the manuscript should be accepted. 1. In the introduction part, authors may display the important difference between xxx to emphasize the importance of this work. 2. If the preparation of xxx followed the literature, authors should cite the references. 3. To verify the structure of catalyst, authors have to provide the data of textural properties of xxx in table 2. 4. Author should also give the standard deviations of xxx. |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
前輩你好,我現(xiàn)在想投這個(gè)期刊,可是看格式方面要求比較簡(jiǎn)單,不知道格式該怎么調(diào)整,請(qǐng)問您那兒有模板嗎?可以給我發(fā)一份嗎? 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)

| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 085701環(huán)境工程,267求調(diào)劑 +13 | minht 2026-03-26 | 13/650 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[有機(jī)交流]
高溫高壓反應(yīng)求助
10+4
|
chibby 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 286求調(diào)劑 +8 | PolarBear11 2026-03-26 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 08開頭275求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拉誰不重要 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +8 | @taotao 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 349求調(diào)劑 +4 | 李木子啊哈哈 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 085601求調(diào)劑總分293英一數(shù)二 +4 | 鋼鐵大炮 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +17 | 碩星赴 2026-03-23 | 17/850 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩 335 分求調(diào)劑 +4 | 拒絕冷暴力 2026-03-25 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 282求調(diào)劑 +3 | wcq131415 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 318求調(diào)劑 +5 | plum李子 2026-03-21 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 上海電力大學(xué)材料防護(hù)與新材料重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室招收調(diào)劑研究生(材料、化學(xué)、電化學(xué),環(huán)境) +4 | 我愛學(xué)電池 2026-03-23 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料專碩找調(diào)劑 +5 | 哈哈哈吼吼吼哈 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 277分求調(diào)劑,跨調(diào)材料 +3 | 考研調(diào)劑lxh 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿吉大化學(xué)322求調(diào)劑 +4 | 17501029541 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿河北工業(yè)大學(xué)0817化工278分求調(diào)劑 +7 | jhybd 2026-03-23 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 335求調(diào)劑 +4 | yuyu宇 2026-03-23 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿國(guó)科過程所081700,274求調(diào)劑 +3 | 三水研0水立方 2026-03-23 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +5 | Zhangbod 2026-03-21 | 7/350 |
|
|
[考研] 285求調(diào)劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-22 | 6/300 |
|