| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 1593 | 回復(fù): 5 | |||
yinhailiang木蟲 (小有名氣)
|
[交流]
catalysis letter 拒稿后能申訴么? 已有5人參與
|
|
向catalysis letter投一篇催化脫硫的稿件,審稿后主編給拒了,但是兩個審稿人的意見都是修改后接收阿,這種情況下申訴有用么?各位有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的專家給個建議吧。另外,主編參考審稿人的意見說我的稿子原創(chuàng)性不強(qiáng),但是兩位審稿專家都沒有提出這樣的問題啊,是不是主編搞錯稿件了? 從審稿人意見看的話,最大就是大修,意見都不尖銳。 Dear Dr. xxx: Enclosed please find the comments of the reviewers on your manuscript entitled "xxx". They both recommend against publication of the manuscript in its present form. They find that the originality is not sufficently strong for Catalysis Letters and that there are a a number of additional peices of work that need to be done to make this acceptable. I must uphold the judgment of the referees and decline the publication of the paper in Catalysis Letters at this time. With best regards, Prof. Andrew Gellman Catalysis Letters gellman@cmu.edu Reviewer(s)' Comments to Author: Referee: 1 Comments to the Author The paper describes synthesis and characterization xxx with the application in HDS and HDN. The paper is of good quality with respect to preparation and characterization of catalysts. However there are some concern and these are follows: 1) xxx. 2) It would be useful if authors measure the dispersion of metals using H2 chemisorption technique. It is well known that this technique can provide valuable information regarding the active site density. In addition, activity of two catalysts should be also determined in terms of turnover number. 3) In order to determine the exact coordination of molybdenum species, authors should characterized catalysts using diffuse reflectance UV–visible Spectroscopy. In conclusion, the manuscript can be published, if authors address above concerns in their revised manuscript. Referee: 2 Comments to the Author In this manuscript, author explored xxx. Authors’ work has exhibited sufficient contribution in this field to publish in Catalysis Letter. After some revision as following problems, the manuscript should be accepted. 1. In the introduction part, authors may display the important difference between xxx to emphasize the importance of this work. 2. If the preparation of xxx followed the literature, authors should cite the references. 3. To verify the structure of catalyst, authors have to provide the data of textural properties of xxx in table 2. 4. Author should also give the standard deviations of xxx. |
木蟲 (正式寫手)
鐵桿木蟲 (著名寫手)
新蟲 (初入文壇)
|
前輩你好,我現(xiàn)在想投這個期刊,可是看格式方面要求比較簡單,不知道格式該怎么調(diào)整,請問您那兒有模板嗎?可以給我發(fā)一份嗎? 發(fā)自小木蟲Android客戶端 |
新蟲 (著名寫手)

| 6 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 083000學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑 +7 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 7/350 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 266分,求材料冶金能源化工等調(diào)劑 +6 | 哇呼哼呼哼 2026-03-27 | 8/400 |
|
|
[考研] 295求調(diào)劑 +5 | 1428151015 2026-03-27 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 學(xué)碩274求調(diào)劑 +5 | Li李魚 2026-03-26 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +4 | Sanmu-124 2026-03-26 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +3 | 加油沖。 2026-03-26 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 085600材料與化工調(diào)劑 +10 | A-哆啦Z夢 2026-03-23 | 16/800 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿北京化工大學(xué)材料與化工 264分各科過A區(qū)國家線 +10 | 哈哈157349 2026-03-21 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +10 | 呼呼?~+123456 2026-03-24 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 312求調(diào)劑 +9 | 上岸吧ZJY 2026-03-22 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 材料求調(diào)劑 +5 | .m.. 2026-03-25 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 求調(diào)劑 +6 | 林之夕 2026-03-24 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 284求調(diào)劑 +11 | junqihahaha 2026-03-26 | 12/600 |
|
|
[考研] 321求調(diào)劑 +5 | 材料cailiao 2026-03-21 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 資源與環(huán)境 調(diào)劑申請(333分) +9 | holy J 2026-03-21 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工328分調(diào)劑 +6 | 。,。,。,。i 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿南航 335分 | 0856材料化工 | GPA 4.07 | 有科研經(jīng)歷 +6 | cccchenso 2026-03-23 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 0854電子信息求調(diào)劑 +7 | α____ 2026-03-22 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 080500求調(diào)劑 +3 | zzzzfan 2026-03-24 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研]
|
13659058978 2026-03-24 | 4/200 |
|