 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3441 | 回復(fù): 15 | |||
| 當(dāng)前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
wutongshun金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[求助]
用高斯09計算的tddft方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)出現(xiàn)問題如何解決？
|
||
|
用高斯09計算的tddft方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài) #p opt=maxcyc=300 td(triplets,nstates=6,root=1) b3lyp/genecp 1 3 出錯信息是： You need to solve for more vectors in order to follow this state. Error termination via Lnk1e in /public1/soft/Gauss09/g09/l914.exe at Tue Apr 26 04:00:18 2011. 請教達人，如何解決？ |
回復(fù)此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 Gaussian |
» 猜你喜歡
中國科學(xué)院成都山地災(zāi)害與環(huán)境研究所2026年特別研究助理（博士后）招聘啟事
已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
-
全獎博士 英國利物浦大學(xué) × 臺灣清華大學(xué) 聯(lián)合培養(yǎng)
已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
-
物理化學(xué)論文潤色/翻譯怎么收費?
已經(jīng)有91人回復(fù)
-
尋博導(dǎo)
已經(jīng)有13人回復(fù)
-
基金正文30頁指的是報告正文還是整個申請書
已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
-
哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué)（深圳）綠色化學(xué)團隊招收2026年秋季入學(xué)博士生
已經(jīng)有11人回復(fù)
-
澳大利亞昆士蘭科技大學(xué)PhD博士獎學(xué)金
已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 配置一臺1萬左右的計算機跑Fortran程序以及高斯的計算
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 高斯計算激發(fā)態(tài)并行問題
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 用TDDFT優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài) l914 錯誤，怎么解決��？
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- [求助]：高斯中的CIS是否能夠優(yōu)化開殼層的激發(fā)態(tài)結(jié)構(gòu)，例如雙重態(tài)，四重態(tài)的激發(fā)態(tài)
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 【求助】TDDFT方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)問題
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 【求助】高斯09優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)幾何后算頻率出錯。求教改正方案。
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 【求助】TDDFT優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)是否一定要用基態(tài)構(gòu)型做為輸入構(gòu)型
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 【求助】請教高手，如何用高斯09的tddft方法計算激發(fā)態(tài)
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 【求助】用TDDFT優(yōu)化出來激發(fā)態(tài)之后的布居分析
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
- 【求助】關(guān)于TDDFT計算激發(fā)態(tài)的問題
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 【求助】單重激發(fā)態(tài)的高斯算法
已經(jīng)有29人回復(fù)
wutongshun
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1654.7
- 散金: 49
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 303
- 在線: 116.1小時
- 蟲號: 542858
- 注冊: 2008-04-10
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機材料化學(xué)
4樓2011-04-26 12:09:21
lihb734
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
站在計算化學(xué)入門的門檻上
- QC強帖: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 132 (高中生)
- 金幣: 7495.4
- 散金: 9378
- 紅花: 74
- 帖子: 3107
- 在線: 1177.3小時
- 蟲號: 448403
- 注冊: 2007-11-01
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 理論和計算化學(xué)
2樓2011-04-26 11:56:19
pwzhou
鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)
- QC強帖: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 51 (初中生)
- 金幣: 7551.4
- 散金: 13
- 紅花: 14
- 帖子: 412
- 在線: 316.9小時
- 蟲號: 56225
- 注冊: 2005-01-07
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 化學(xué)動力學(xué)
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
wutongshun(金幣+1): 2011-04-26 12:40:52
|
我再把Gaussian公司的回信附上來，希望這是最后一次有人問這個問題，我實在不記得這已經(jīng)是多少次有人問這一個同樣的問題了。問問題之前搜索一下很難嗎？ In the case of "No map to state **, you need to resolve more vectors" messages, this is usually an indication that one did not include enough excited states in the TD or CIS calculation. The "States=N" option to the "TD" or "CIS" keywords tells how many excited states to include in an excited state energy calculation. If this is not specified, the default value will be "States=3". The recommended value is to include a minimum of 2 or 3 more states than the state of interest. Thus, if you want to perform a geometry optimization for excited state 5, for example, I would recommend at least using "States=7" or "States=8". The geometry optimization will be done for one excited state M, selected with "Root=M", and one has to make sure that enough states are included in the CIS or TD expansion by having "States=N" where N is larger than M. It is possible that, at some point during an optimization of an excited state, the order of the excited states changes and the CIS or TD expansion might need to include more states in order to be able to follow correctly the state of interest. This is essentially what that message about including more vectors mean, that is that at that point, the number of states that you originally specified with "States=N" was not enough in order to solve for the state of interest, so a larger number "N" will need to be used for "States=N". Other times, the problem is that the ground state wavefunction becomes unstable, that is one of the states that was an excited at the initial geometry now becomes lower in energy than the state that was the ground state at the initial geometry. This kind of situation, unfortunately, cannot be modeled properly with single determinant expansions such as CIS or TD, and one would need to use CAS in order to be able to deal with the conical intersection or avoided crossing of states. Another thing to note is that one should be much more careful with geometry optimizations on excited states than for the ground state. Typically the energy differences among excited states are smaller than between the ground state and the first excited state. Thus, one can afford to perform larger geometry optimization steps when optimizing the ground state than in the case of optimizing an excited state. A "bad" geometry optimization step in the optimization of the ground state, may take you a bit off track but in following steps the optimization might find the way back and approach the converged structure. In the case of an optimization of an excited state, a "bad" geometry optimization step will also take you off track but, since other electronic states are close in energy, it is possible that at the new geometry the order of the excited states change and now the geometry optimization follows a different electronic state. This is not only a problem because the optimization could be pursuing a different state than the one you were interested in, but also because, if several of these changes occur during a geometry optimization, it may even be hopeless to continue with the optimization because the gradient information and the estimated hessian could be useless (since not all the previous points in the geometry optimization where points from the same potential energy surface). As a first measure to increase the reliability of the geometry optimization of excited states, I recommend to reduce the maximum allowed step size during geometry optimizations. Try "Opt=(MaxStep=10)" to set this value to 0.10 Bohr, or a smaller value if you still have problems. The default value is typically 0.30 Bohr. Reducing the maximum allowed step size will result in the geometry optimization taking more steps to reach convergence than with the default value. This will be true obviously for well-behaved geometry optimizations, but for problematic cases it will be the other way around, i.e. it will take fewer steps (and may even be impossible with the default step size) because it will be easier for the optimizer to follow a particular electronic state if the changes from step to step are not very drastic. |
3樓2011-04-26 12:02:55
wutongshun
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1654.7
- 散金: 49
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 303
- 在線: 116.1小時
- 蟲號: 542858
- 注冊: 2008-04-10
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機材料化學(xué)
5樓2011-04-26 12:14:09
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 311求調(diào)劑 +9 | 冬十三 2026-03-15 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 296求調(diào)劑 +5 | 大口吃飯 身體健 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 328求調(diào)劑，英語六級551，有科研經(jīng)歷 +3 | 生物工程調(diào)劑 2026-03-16 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +8 | 小熊joy 2026-03-14 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 湖北工業(yè)大學(xué) 生命科學(xué)與健康學(xué)院-課題組招收2026級食品/生物方向碩士 +3 | 1喜春8 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +9 | 負(fù)心者當(dāng)誅 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑 +11 | 大米飯！ 2026-03-15 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 【0856】化學(xué)工程（085602）313 分，本科學(xué)科評估A類院校化學(xué)工程與工藝，誠求調(diào)劑 +7 | 小劉快快上岸 2026-03-11 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +12 | 生如夏花… 2026-03-11 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 302求調(diào)劑 +4 | 小賈同學(xué)123 2026-03-15 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 274求調(diào)劑 +5 | 時間點 2026-03-13 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600調(diào)劑 +5 | 漾漾123sun 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 070303 總分349求調(diào)劑 +3 | LJY9966 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 290分有科研經(jīng)歷，論文在投 +7 | 膩膩gk 2026-03-14 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個專家，不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +4 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-14 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 快樂的香蕉 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 315求調(diào)劑 +9 | 小羊小羊_ 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +4 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 土木第一志愿276求調(diào)劑，科研和技能十分豐富，求新興方向的導(dǎo)師收留 +3 | 土木小天才 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|