 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 查看: 3439 | 回復(fù): 15 | |||
wutongshun金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[求助]
用高斯09計算的tddft方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)出現(xiàn)問題如何解決？
|
||
|
用高斯09計算的tddft方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài) #p opt=maxcyc=300 td(triplets,nstates=6,root=1) b3lyp/genecp 1 3 出錯信息是： You need to solve for more vectors in order to follow this state. Error termination via Lnk1e in /public1/soft/Gauss09/g09/l914.exe at Tue Apr 26 04:00:18 2011. 請教達(dá)人，如何解決？ |
回復(fù)此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 Gaussian |
» 猜你喜歡
cif求助下載
已經(jīng)有1人回復(fù)
-
高效微納米儲能材料與產(chǎn)業(yè)化推進(jìn)實驗室 蘇州 招收碩士研究生（含調(diào)劑）
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
物理化學(xué)論文潤色/翻譯怎么收費?
已經(jīng)有278人回復(fù)
-
高效微納米儲能材料與產(chǎn)業(yè)化推進(jìn)實驗室 蘇州 招收碩士研究生（含調(diào)劑）
已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
-
高效微納米儲能材料與產(chǎn)業(yè)化推進(jìn)實驗室 蘇州 招收碩士研究生（含調(diào)劑）
已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
-
化學(xué)化工學(xué)院 招收化工、化學(xué)、材料等相關(guān)方向研究生（學(xué)碩、專碩都有調(diào)劑名額）
已經(jīng)有1人回復(fù)
-
高效微納米儲能材料與產(chǎn)業(yè)化推進(jìn)實驗室 蘇州 招收碩士研究生（含調(diào)劑）
已經(jīng)有0人回復(fù)
-
溫州大學(xué)新能源材料微觀溯源課題組招收2026級博士研究生（材料、化學(xué)方向）
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
-
材料與化工 323 英一+數(shù)二+物化，一志愿：哈工大 本人本科雙一流
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
-
26申博
已經(jīng)有2人回復(fù)
» 本主題相關(guān)價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 配置一臺1萬左右的計算機(jī)跑Fortran程序以及高斯的計算
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 高斯計算激發(fā)態(tài)并行問題
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- 用TDDFT優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài) l914 錯誤，怎么解決�。�
已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
- [求助]：高斯中的CIS是否能夠優(yōu)化開殼層的激發(fā)態(tài)結(jié)構(gòu)，例如雙重態(tài)，四重態(tài)的激發(fā)態(tài)
已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
- 【求助】TDDFT方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)問題
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 【求助】高斯09優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)幾何后算頻率出錯。求教改正方案。
已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
- 【求助】TDDFT優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)是否一定要用基態(tài)構(gòu)型做為輸入構(gòu)型
已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
- 【求助】請教高手，如何用高斯09的tddft方法計算激發(fā)態(tài)
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 【求助】用TDDFT優(yōu)化出來激發(fā)態(tài)之后的布居分析
已經(jīng)有20人回復(fù)
- 【求助】關(guān)于TDDFT計算激發(fā)態(tài)的問題
已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
- 【求助】單重激發(fā)態(tài)的高斯算法
已經(jīng)有29人回復(fù)
pwzhou
鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)
- QC強(qiáng)帖: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 51 (初中生)
- 金幣: 7551.4
- 散金: 13
- 紅花: 14
- 帖子: 412
- 在線: 316.9小時
- 蟲號: 56225
- 注冊: 2005-01-07
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 化學(xué)動力學(xué)
【答案】應(yīng)助回帖
wutongshun(金幣+1): 2011-04-26 12:40:52
|
我再把Gaussian公司的回信附上來，希望這是最后一次有人問這個問題，我實在不記得這已經(jīng)是多少次有人問這一個同樣的問題了。問問題之前搜索一下很難嗎？ In the case of "No map to state **, you need to resolve more vectors" messages, this is usually an indication that one did not include enough excited states in the TD or CIS calculation. The "States=N" option to the "TD" or "CIS" keywords tells how many excited states to include in an excited state energy calculation. If this is not specified, the default value will be "States=3". The recommended value is to include a minimum of 2 or 3 more states than the state of interest. Thus, if you want to perform a geometry optimization for excited state 5, for example, I would recommend at least using "States=7" or "States=8". The geometry optimization will be done for one excited state M, selected with "Root=M", and one has to make sure that enough states are included in the CIS or TD expansion by having "States=N" where N is larger than M. It is possible that, at some point during an optimization of an excited state, the order of the excited states changes and the CIS or TD expansion might need to include more states in order to be able to follow correctly the state of interest. This is essentially what that message about including more vectors mean, that is that at that point, the number of states that you originally specified with "States=N" was not enough in order to solve for the state of interest, so a larger number "N" will need to be used for "States=N". Other times, the problem is that the ground state wavefunction becomes unstable, that is one of the states that was an excited at the initial geometry now becomes lower in energy than the state that was the ground state at the initial geometry. This kind of situation, unfortunately, cannot be modeled properly with single determinant expansions such as CIS or TD, and one would need to use CAS in order to be able to deal with the conical intersection or avoided crossing of states. Another thing to note is that one should be much more careful with geometry optimizations on excited states than for the ground state. Typically the energy differences among excited states are smaller than between the ground state and the first excited state. Thus, one can afford to perform larger geometry optimization steps when optimizing the ground state than in the case of optimizing an excited state. A "bad" geometry optimization step in the optimization of the ground state, may take you a bit off track but in following steps the optimization might find the way back and approach the converged structure. In the case of an optimization of an excited state, a "bad" geometry optimization step will also take you off track but, since other electronic states are close in energy, it is possible that at the new geometry the order of the excited states change and now the geometry optimization follows a different electronic state. This is not only a problem because the optimization could be pursuing a different state than the one you were interested in, but also because, if several of these changes occur during a geometry optimization, it may even be hopeless to continue with the optimization because the gradient information and the estimated hessian could be useless (since not all the previous points in the geometry optimization where points from the same potential energy surface). As a first measure to increase the reliability of the geometry optimization of excited states, I recommend to reduce the maximum allowed step size during geometry optimizations. Try "Opt=(MaxStep=10)" to set this value to 0.10 Bohr, or a smaller value if you still have problems. The default value is typically 0.30 Bohr. Reducing the maximum allowed step size will result in the geometry optimization taking more steps to reach convergence than with the default value. This will be true obviously for well-behaved geometry optimizations, but for problematic cases it will be the other way around, i.e. it will take fewer steps (and may even be impossible with the default step size) because it will be easier for the optimizer to follow a particular electronic state if the changes from step to step are not very drastic. |
3樓2011-04-26 12:02:55
lihb734
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
站在計算化學(xué)入門的門檻上
- QC強(qiáng)帖: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 132 (高中生)
- 金幣: 7495.4
- 散金: 9378
- 紅花: 74
- 帖子: 3107
- 在線: 1177.3小時
- 蟲號: 448403
- 注冊: 2007-11-01
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 理論和計算化學(xué)
7樓2011-04-26 12:46:54
exabyss916
新蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 177
- 散金: 65
- 帖子: 78
- 在線: 57小時
- 蟲號: 507882
- 注冊: 2008-02-20
- 專業(yè): 理論和計算化學(xué)
11樓2011-05-19 19:02:18
lihb734
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
站在計算化學(xué)入門的門檻上
- QC強(qiáng)帖: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 132 (高中生)
- 金幣: 7495.4
- 散金: 9378
- 紅花: 74
- 帖子: 3107
- 在線: 1177.3小時
- 蟲號: 448403
- 注冊: 2007-11-01
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 理論和計算化學(xué)
2樓2011-04-26 11:56:19
wutongshun
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1654.7
- 散金: 49
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 303
- 在線: 116.1小時
- 蟲號: 542858
- 注冊: 2008-04-10
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機(jī)材料化學(xué)
4樓2011-04-26 12:09:21
wutongshun
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1654.7
- 散金: 49
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 303
- 在線: 116.1小時
- 蟲號: 542858
- 注冊: 2008-04-10
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機(jī)材料化學(xué)
5樓2011-04-26 12:14:09
wutongshun
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1654.7
- 散金: 49
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 303
- 在線: 116.1小時
- 蟲號: 542858
- 注冊: 2008-04-10
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機(jī)材料化學(xué)
|
也是用g09tddft優(yōu)化最低激發(fā)三重態(tài) 而且我用了同樣的說明，分子也是一樣的，居然出錯信息不一樣 #p opt=maxcyc=300 td(triplets,nstates=6,root=1) b3lyp/genecp 1 3 出錯信息是 Convergence failure -- run terminated. Error termination via Lnk1e in /public1/Gauss09.B01/g09/l502.exe at Tue Apr 26 10:39:24 2011. 請教達(dá)人為什么會這樣？如何處理呢？ |
6樓2011-04-26 12:21:02
lihb734
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
站在計算化學(xué)入門的門檻上
- QC強(qiáng)帖: 2
- 應(yīng)助: 132 (高中生)
- 金幣: 7495.4
- 散金: 9378
- 紅花: 74
- 帖子: 3107
- 在線: 1177.3小時
- 蟲號: 448403
- 注冊: 2007-11-01
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 理論和計算化學(xué)
8樓2011-04-26 12:48:29
wutongshun
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應(yīng)助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1654.7
- 散金: 49
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 303
- 在線: 116.1小時
- 蟲號: 542858
- 注冊: 2008-04-10
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機(jī)材料化學(xué)
9樓2011-04-27 21:30:29
huangshp
金蟲 (小有名氣)
- 應(yīng)助: 3 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 3476.9
- 散金: 2
- 紅花: 1
- 帖子: 265
- 在線: 159.6小時
- 蟲號: 748725
- 注冊: 2009-04-14
- 性別: MM
- 專業(yè): 理論和計算化學(xué)
10樓2011-05-19 16:52:54
相關(guān)版塊跳轉(zhuǎn)
我要訂閱樓主 wutongshun 的主題更新
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 277調(diào)劑 +5 | 自由煎餅果子 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考研] 070300化學(xué)319求調(diào)劑 +4 | 錦鯉0909 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 268求調(diào)劑 +8 | 一定有學(xué)上- 2026-03-14 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑 +11 | 大米飯！ 2026-03-15 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 289求調(diào)劑 +6 | 步川酷紫123 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 機(jī)械專碩325，尋找調(diào)劑院校 +3 | y9999 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +3 | 曼殊2266 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 26考研一志愿中國石油大學(xué)(華東)305分求調(diào)劑 +3 | 嘉年新程 2026-03-15 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本科南京大學(xué)一志愿川大藥學(xué)327 +3 | 麥田耕者 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[基金申請] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個專家，不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 復(fù)試調(diào)劑 +3 | 呼呼？~+123456 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 308 085701 四六級已過求調(diào)劑 +7 | 溫喬喬喬喬 2026-03-12 | 14/700 |
|
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | ?醬給調(diào)劑跪了 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 337一志愿華南理工0805材料求調(diào)劑 +7 | mysdl 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[考研] 0703化學(xué)調(diào)劑 +4 | 快樂的香蕉 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大，材料專碩317求調(diào)劑 +5 | lx8568 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 工科，求調(diào)劑 +3 | 我887 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 求b區(qū)學(xué)校調(diào)劑 +3 | 周56 2026-03-11 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 工科278分求調(diào)劑 +5 | 周慢熱啊 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿山大07化學(xué) 332分 四六級已過 本科山東雙非 求調(diào)劑！ +3 | 不想理你 2026-03-12 | 3/150 |
|