 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| 5 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 3440 | 回復: 15 | |||
| 當前只顯示滿足指定條件的回帖，點擊這里查看本話題的所有回帖 | |||
wutongshun金蟲 (正式寫手)
|
[求助]
用高斯09計算的tddft方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)出現問題如何解決？
|
||
|
用高斯09計算的tddft方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài) #p opt=maxcyc=300 td(triplets,nstates=6,root=1) b3lyp/genecp 1 3 出錯信息是： You need to solve for more vectors in order to follow this state. Error termination via Lnk1e in /public1/soft/Gauss09/g09/l914.exe at Tue Apr 26 04:00:18 2011. 請教達人，如何解決？ |
回復此樓» 收錄本帖的淘帖專輯推薦
 Gaussian |
» 猜你喜歡
PbS量子點紫外吸收
已經有0人回復
-
比利時魯汶大學與國家留學基金委共同資助博士研究生CSC-KU Leuven PhD Scholarship
已經有0人回復
-
物理化學論文潤色/翻譯怎么收費?
已經有268人回復
-
[電子教材]天津大學物理化學（第七版）上、下冊
已經有3人回復
-
半透性容器進行高濕或者低濕研究
已經有0人回復
-
陰離子交換膜電解二氧化碳還原
已經有0人回復
-
倫敦大學學院Benjamin Moss博士招收人工智能、原位光譜、催化相關26年博士生
已經有11人回復
-
中國科學院成都山地災害與環(huán)境研究所2026年特別研究助理（博士后）招聘啟事
已經有0人回復
-
九江學院2026年最新高層次人才招聘公告
已經有0人回復
-
深圳信息職業(yè)技術學院2026年教師招聘公告（最新）
已經有0人回復
-
研究生招生
已經有0人回復
» 本主題相關價值貼推薦，對您同樣有幫助:
- 配置一臺1萬左右的計算機跑Fortran程序以及高斯的計算
已經有8人回復
- 高斯計算激發(fā)態(tài)并行問題
已經有6人回復
- 用TDDFT優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài) l914 錯誤，怎么解決�。�
已經有6人回復
- [求助]：高斯中的CIS是否能夠優(yōu)化開殼層的激發(fā)態(tài)結構，例如雙重態(tài)，四重態(tài)的激發(fā)態(tài)
已經有8人回復
- 【求助】TDDFT方法優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)問題
已經有5人回復
- 【求助】高斯09優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)幾何后算頻率出錯。求教改正方案。
已經有4人回復
- 【求助】TDDFT優(yōu)化激發(fā)態(tài)是否一定要用基態(tài)構型做為輸入構型
已經有5人回復
- 【求助】請教高手，如何用高斯09的tddft方法計算激發(fā)態(tài)
已經有7人回復
- 【求助】用TDDFT優(yōu)化出來激發(fā)態(tài)之后的布居分析
已經有20人回復
- 【求助】關于TDDFT計算激發(fā)態(tài)的問題
已經有7人回復
- 【求助】單重激發(fā)態(tài)的高斯算法
已經有29人回復
lihb734
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
站在計算化學入門的門檻上
- QC強帖: 2
- 應助: 132 (高中生)
- 金幣: 7495.4
- 散金: 9378
- 紅花: 74
- 帖子: 3107
- 在線: 1177.3小時
- 蟲號: 448403
- 注冊: 2007-11-01
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 理論和計算化學
7樓2011-04-26 12:46:54
lihb734
鐵桿木蟲 (職業(yè)作家)
站在計算化學入門的門檻上
- QC強帖: 2
- 應助: 132 (高中生)
- 金幣: 7495.4
- 散金: 9378
- 紅花: 74
- 帖子: 3107
- 在線: 1177.3小時
- 蟲號: 448403
- 注冊: 2007-11-01
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 理論和計算化學
2樓2011-04-26 11:56:19
pwzhou
鐵桿木蟲 (正式寫手)
- QC強帖: 2
- 應助: 51 (初中生)
- 金幣: 7551.4
- 散金: 13
- 紅花: 14
- 帖子: 412
- 在線: 316.9小時
- 蟲號: 56225
- 注冊: 2005-01-07
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 化學動力學
【答案】應助回帖
wutongshun(金幣+1): 2011-04-26 12:40:52
|
我再把Gaussian公司的回信附上來，希望這是最后一次有人問這個問題，我實在不記得這已經是多少次有人問這一個同樣的問題了。問問題之前搜索一下很難嗎？ In the case of "No map to state **, you need to resolve more vectors" messages, this is usually an indication that one did not include enough excited states in the TD or CIS calculation. The "States=N" option to the "TD" or "CIS" keywords tells how many excited states to include in an excited state energy calculation. If this is not specified, the default value will be "States=3". The recommended value is to include a minimum of 2 or 3 more states than the state of interest. Thus, if you want to perform a geometry optimization for excited state 5, for example, I would recommend at least using "States=7" or "States=8". The geometry optimization will be done for one excited state M, selected with "Root=M", and one has to make sure that enough states are included in the CIS or TD expansion by having "States=N" where N is larger than M. It is possible that, at some point during an optimization of an excited state, the order of the excited states changes and the CIS or TD expansion might need to include more states in order to be able to follow correctly the state of interest. This is essentially what that message about including more vectors mean, that is that at that point, the number of states that you originally specified with "States=N" was not enough in order to solve for the state of interest, so a larger number "N" will need to be used for "States=N". Other times, the problem is that the ground state wavefunction becomes unstable, that is one of the states that was an excited at the initial geometry now becomes lower in energy than the state that was the ground state at the initial geometry. This kind of situation, unfortunately, cannot be modeled properly with single determinant expansions such as CIS or TD, and one would need to use CAS in order to be able to deal with the conical intersection or avoided crossing of states. Another thing to note is that one should be much more careful with geometry optimizations on excited states than for the ground state. Typically the energy differences among excited states are smaller than between the ground state and the first excited state. Thus, one can afford to perform larger geometry optimization steps when optimizing the ground state than in the case of optimizing an excited state. A "bad" geometry optimization step in the optimization of the ground state, may take you a bit off track but in following steps the optimization might find the way back and approach the converged structure. In the case of an optimization of an excited state, a "bad" geometry optimization step will also take you off track but, since other electronic states are close in energy, it is possible that at the new geometry the order of the excited states change and now the geometry optimization follows a different electronic state. This is not only a problem because the optimization could be pursuing a different state than the one you were interested in, but also because, if several of these changes occur during a geometry optimization, it may even be hopeless to continue with the optimization because the gradient information and the estimated hessian could be useless (since not all the previous points in the geometry optimization where points from the same potential energy surface). As a first measure to increase the reliability of the geometry optimization of excited states, I recommend to reduce the maximum allowed step size during geometry optimizations. Try "Opt=(MaxStep=10)" to set this value to 0.10 Bohr, or a smaller value if you still have problems. The default value is typically 0.30 Bohr. Reducing the maximum allowed step size will result in the geometry optimization taking more steps to reach convergence than with the default value. This will be true obviously for well-behaved geometry optimizations, but for problematic cases it will be the other way around, i.e. it will take fewer steps (and may even be impossible with the default step size) because it will be easier for the optimizer to follow a particular electronic state if the changes from step to step are not very drastic. |
3樓2011-04-26 12:02:55
wutongshun
金蟲 (正式寫手)
- 應助: 4 (幼兒園)
- 金幣: 1654.7
- 散金: 49
- 紅花: 3
- 帖子: 303
- 在線: 116.1小時
- 蟲號: 542858
- 注冊: 2008-04-10
- 性別: GG
- 專業(yè): 無機材料化學
4樓2011-04-26 12:09:21
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 材料專碩306英一數二 +8 | z1z2z3879 2026-03-16 | 10/500 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
[考博] 26博士申請 +3 | 1042136743 2026-03-17 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 能源材料化學課題組招收碩士研究生8-10名 +3 | 脫穎而出 2026-03-16 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 293求調劑 +7 | zjl的號 2026-03-16 | 12/600 |
|
|
|
[考博] 26申博 +4 | 八旬速覽 2026-03-16 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[碩博家園] 深圳大學碩士招生（2026秋，傳感器方向，僅錄取第一志愿） +4 | xujiaoszu 2026-03-11 | 9/450 |
|
|
|
[基金申請]
今年的國基金是打分制嗎？
 50+3
|
zhanghaozhu 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 311求調劑 +5 | 26研0 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 085600調劑 +5 | 漾漾123sun 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 285求調劑 +6 | ytter 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料與化工一志愿南昌大學327求調劑推薦 +7 | Ncdx123456 2026-03-13 | 8/400 |
|
|
|
[考研] 294求調劑 +3 | Zys010410@ 2026-03-13 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 本科南京大學一志愿川大藥學327 +3 | 麥田耕者 2026-03-14 | 3/150 |
|
|
|
[考研] 332求調劑 +3 | zjy101327 2026-03-11 | 6/300 |
|
|
|
[考研] 一志愿西南交大，材料專碩317求調劑 +5 | lx8568 2026-03-11 | 5/250 |
|
|
|
[考研] 315求調劑 +9 | 小羊小羊_ 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調劑 +4 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 考研調劑 +4 | 芬達46 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
|
[考研] 314求調劑 +7 | 無懈可擊的巨人 2026-03-12 | 7/350 |
|
|
|
[考研] 283求調劑，材料、化工皆可 +8 | 蘇打水7777 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|