| 23 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 查看: 4169 | 回復(fù): 22 | |||
[交流]
幫看看es&t 審稿意見
|
|
文章被拒,3個(gè)意見,第1個(gè)審稿人,拒絕,意見只有2句不痛不癢的話,第2個(gè)審稿人,拒絕,意見一般,不過里面的問題基本上都是不重要或者審稿人由于沒仔細(xì)看文章而下的論斷。第3個(gè)建議大修,但是對文章的重要性和創(chuàng)新性予以的好評。而且看得出來,這個(gè)人對我做的東西比較了解。此外,評審人所有問題都可以比較好的回答或者反駁。 請各位專家?guī)涂纯聪旅孢@個(gè)編輯意見怎么樣?個(gè)人感覺編輯沒完全否定文章:I have concluded that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in ES&T in its current form. I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal.是否有重投的必要性?或是編輯拒絕文章都是這種的口氣,即使很爛也是這樣拒絕? 意見如下: Your manuscript was assigned to me for editorial handling by ES&T Editor Dr. Jerald Schnoor. I have received three reviews of your manuscript (attached). As you will see, two of the reviewers noted that the research was quite thorough and included a substantial amount of new information that might be valuable to the research community. However, all three reviewers noted significant shortcomings. In particular, Reviewer 2 indicated that the manuscript lacked novelty and included numerous statements that were not well supported by data. Reviewers 2 and 3 both noted a lack of information on the reproducibility of experiments while Reviewer 1 questioned the relevance of using pure cyanobacteria cultures to gain insight into this problem. On the basis of these concerns, I have concluded that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in ES&T in its current form. I believe that the findings presented in this manuscript is potentially interesting to researchers studying water treatment and algal blooms and I encourage you to submit it to a journal specializing in that topic. Although this manuscript is not appropriate for publication in ES&T, your interest in publishing your work in ES&T is appreciated. I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal. [ Last edited by lilei119 on 2011-5-14 at 15:46 ] |
» 搶金幣啦!回帖就可以得到:
+1/97
+1/84
+1/81
+1/80
+1/78
+1/71
+2/44
+1/39
+1/36
+1/34
+1/25
+1/12
+1/7
+1/7
+1/6
+1/6
+1/5
+1/3
+1/3
+1/1
榮譽(yù)版主 (文學(xué)泰斗)
|
I believe that the findings presented in this manuscript is potentially interesting to researchers studying water treatment and algal blooms and I encourage you to submit it to a journal specializing in that topic. 編輯的意思感覺應(yīng)該是委婉的 不再考慮了 不過如果lz感覺能夠120%的回復(fù)審稿人的意見后,也可以再resubmit試試運(yùn)氣,畢竟est還是壞境領(lǐng)域的NO.1 |
|
不要那么懷疑編輯。為什么不看這兩句?審稿人的意見及花的時(shí)間,編輯也不會(huì)想浪費(fèi)。。。 two of the reviewers noted that the research was quite thorough and included a substantial amount of new information that might be valuable to the research community I hope that the reviewers' comments are of help to you if you choose to revise and resubmit the manuscript or if you decide to submit it to another journal. 還有,樓主說可以解決提的問題。 |
|
我剛有篇文章也是要求重投的,花了很大精力,結(jié)果二審的意見比一審還要差。 如果要求重投的話,你的文章狀態(tài)會(huì)改為Revision or resubmission requested。 如果沒有出現(xiàn)這個(gè)欄目,估計(jì)是不能重投了。 Note:重投要重新選評審,我一審的三個(gè)都是大改,結(jié)果我按要求大改了。二審的三個(gè)專家感覺只有一個(gè)來自前面的三個(gè),另外兩個(gè)是新增了,又提了不同角度的問題。個(gè)人感覺重投很麻煩,完全按照一審的意見來修改不一定合適。我的經(jīng)驗(yàn)告訴我,完全按一審的意見改后有些局部的內(nèi)容會(huì)有所改變,結(jié)果二審有重新提出新的問題。所以,對于一些自己認(rèn)為比較新的內(nèi)容一定要堅(jiān)持。 |
|
這個(gè)不是花多少精力的問題,而是審稿人的意見(直接或間接的意見)能否解決。一次類似情況,被拒后重投,主要是把題目改了一下,內(nèi)容稍微修改,強(qiáng)調(diào)與雜志相關(guān)的貢獻(xiàn),也都小修接收了。當(dāng)然,口氣也很重要,要謝謝審稿人,意見對修改很有幫助。。。 被拒后都可以重投,為什么這樣不能? http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1917936 |
|
I believe that the findings presented in this manuscript is potentially interesting to researchers studying water treatment and algal blooms and I encourage you to submit it to a journal specializing in that topic. 編輯傾向于讓你投專業(yè)雜志。感覺三個(gè)審稿人說創(chuàng)新不夠,編輯還是同意三個(gè)審稿人說的。建議改投其他雜志。 |
至尊木蟲 (知名作家)
|
重投接收的希望應(yīng)該很大。我建議重投的原因很清楚了。 http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?fid=125&tid=3190892&authorid=489254 不知道你是針對這個(gè)雜志這樣說,還是根據(jù)審稿意見?我的話也是從編輯角度說的。大家盡量找機(jī)會(huì)與各種編輯討論討論,就知道了。 http://www.gaoyang168.com/bbs/viewthread.php?tid=1922573 |
| 23 | 1/1 | 返回列表 |
| 最具人氣熱帖推薦 [查看全部] | 作者 | 回/看 | 最后發(fā)表 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 271求調(diào)劑 +12 | 生如夏花… 2026-03-11 | 14/700 |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
[考研] 285化工學(xué)碩求調(diào)劑(081700) +9 | 柴郡貓_ 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
[論文投稿] 有沒有大佬發(fā)小論文能帶我個(gè)二作 +3 | 增銳漏人 2026-03-17 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 考研調(diào)劑 +3 | 淇ya_~ 2026-03-17 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑 +3 | 聽風(fēng)就是雨; 2026-03-16 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 化學(xué)工程321分求調(diào)劑 +10 | 大米飯! 2026-03-15 | 13/650 |
|
|
[考研] 東南大學(xué)364求調(diào)劑 +5 | JasonYuiui 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 304求調(diào)劑 +5 | 素年祭語 2026-03-15 | 5/250 |
|
|
[考研] 070305求調(diào)劑 +3 | mlpqaz03 2026-03-14 | 4/200 |
|
|
[基金申請] 現(xiàn)在如何回避去年的某一個(gè)專家,不知道名字 +3 | zk200107 2026-03-12 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 255求調(diào)劑 +3 | 李嘉慧, 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料080500調(diào)劑求收留 +3 | 一顆meteor 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 330求調(diào)劑 +3 | ?醬給調(diào)劑跪了 2026-03-13 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 0805,333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 112253525 2026-03-10 | 3/150 |
|
|
[考研] 一志愿中科院,化學(xué)方向,295求調(diào)劑 +4 | 一氧二氮 2026-03-11 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 材料工程調(diào)劑 +9 | 咪咪空空 2026-03-12 | 9/450 |
|
|
[考研] 26調(diào)劑/材料/英一數(shù)二/總分289/已過A區(qū)線 +6 | 步川酷紫123 2026-03-13 | 6/300 |
|
|
[考研] 328化工專碩求調(diào)劑 +4 | 。,。,。,。i 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|
|
[考研] 283求調(diào)劑,材料、化工皆可 +8 | 蘇打水7777 2026-03-11 | 10/500 |
|
|
[考研] 333求調(diào)劑 +3 | 152697 2026-03-12 | 4/200 |
|