版塊導(dǎo)航: 正在加載中...

登錄注冊

應(yīng)《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未進(jìn)行實(shí)名認(rèn)證將不得使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)跟帖服務(wù)。為保障您的帳號(hào)能夠正常使用，請盡快對(duì)帳號(hào)進(jìn)行手機(jī)號(hào)驗(yàn)證，感謝您的理解與支持！

24小時(shí)熱門版塊排行榜

返回列表

zhou_jun

木蟲 (小有名氣)

應(yīng)助: 1 (幼兒園)
金幣: 3148.8
散金: 1800
紅花: 5
帖子: 178
在線: 246小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 816171
注冊: 2009-07-26
性別: GG
專業(yè): 光子與光電子器件

[求助] 關(guān)于論文修改的求助

最近投稿總是不太順利，所以來向各位求助，希望大家多幫幫忙。先謝謝了。

在今年1月份投出去一篇文章，3月份得到回復(fù)如下：

Dear Mr. ***,

We have received the referee's comments on your paper titled "***", which indicate that it is not appropriate for publication in *** in its present form. Please revise your manuscript as suggested and submit a detailed response to the referee, including a detailed description of the revisions made in the paper. The revised manuscript and response are due by May 7, 2011 via the PXP web site. These will then be sent back to the referee for further review.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reviewer Comments:
This paper describe implementation and application of the *** code, and its input and output graphical infrastructure. The authors have been very successful in this large project.
Their algorithms as described are well established in prior practice, as cited in the references. Other algorithms and methods, e.g. ***, and ***, are not described. Results are verified by comparison to other codes.
The development and verification of the code is a creditable accomplishment in providing the authors with a powerful modeling tool. However this reviewer does not find new algorithms or methods, nor new physics or device results, in these manuscripts. Publication in *** is not recommended.

從審稿人的意見來看，先是肯定了我們的研究工作（當(dāng)然也可能是客套話），但最后還是由于沒有提出新的物理和方法，不建議發(fā)表。我們按照審稿人的意見，對(duì)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了修改和充實(shí)，在4月份重新投過去，5月初收到回復(fù)如下：

Dear Mr. ***,

We have received the referee's report on your paper titled "***" The referee's comments indicate that the paper is not appropriate for publication.  You may choose to revise your manuscript to address the referee's concerns.  If you do, you must submit a detailed response to the referee along with the revised manuscript. The revised manuscript is due by July 9, 2011 via the PXP web site. The Editors will then make the decision on the next step in the review process.
Please feel free to contact the Editorial Office if you have any questions or concerns.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reviewer Comments:
In comparison to the original manuscript, the changes found are mainly a discussion of optimization of .  There is no evidence that they have advanced the state of that art.  The main body of algorithms as described are well established in prior practice and documented in publications. This reviewer still does not find new physics or results in this revision.
In the development of the code, the authors have assembled a good selection of algorithms and infrastructure to fit their computer facility and applications.  They then carefully verify their codes by comparison with previous results.  This is a systematic, laudable development of their modeling capability.  But I believe the manuscript does not "contain significant new research contributions" (item 1 in "Publication Standards and Review Procedures).
Publication in *** is not recommended.

審稿意見還是部分肯定后無情地拒絕了。這估計(jì)是編輯給我的最后一次修改和解釋的機(jī)會(huì)了，請幫忙看看怎么來回復(fù)這種審稿意見。（ps：這篇文章是關(guān)于我們開發(fā)的一款大型科學(xué)計(jì)算程序的，實(shí)現(xiàn)起來工作量很大，耗費(fèi)了好幾年的心血，目前應(yīng)用情況良好。這方面研究國內(nèi)還很少，但就是因?yàn)樗惴ㄉ显趪庖掩呌诔墒�，投稿到國外英文�?yīng)用物理類期刊很費(fèi)周折。如果這次還是不中，不知轉(zhuǎn)投到IEEE系列期刊是否更合適一些。）

回復(fù)此樓

» 猜你喜歡

材料考研調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
346求調(diào)劑[0856] 已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
281求調(diào)劑（0805）已經(jīng)有18人回復(fù)
294求調(diào)劑材料與化工專碩已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
288求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
328求調(diào)劑，英語六級(jí)551，有科研經(jīng)歷已經(jīng)有12人回復(fù)
一志愿西安交通大學(xué)材料工程專業(yè) 282分求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
085601材料工程專碩求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
321求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
一志愿中海洋材料工程專碩330分求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)

» 本主題相關(guān)價(jià)值貼推薦，對(duì)您同樣有幫助:

論文被退回，說是英文水平達(dá)不到要求，求助高人哪里有較好的論文修改公司？已經(jīng)有9人回復(fù)
論文修改意見求助已經(jīng)有27人回復(fù)
求助英文文章修改方面的問題已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
《表面技術(shù)》修改意見求助已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
【求助】修改英文論文的靠譜人士已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
20幣求助論文摘要翻譯修改，希望翻譯的專業(yè)點(diǎn) 已經(jīng)有1人回復(fù)
修改稿求助已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
求助關(guān)于論文修改�。�！請大家多多指教.................... 已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
緊急求助，關(guān)于新投稿外審前修改已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
求助，關(guān)于修改稿的問題已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
求助：論文修改稿怎樣發(fā)給編輯？已經(jīng)有8人回復(fù)
論文語法錯(cuò)誤修改求助已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
求助：關(guān)于文章大修已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)
求助關(guān)于修改稿投APL 已經(jīng)有15人回復(fù)

Do NOT Stop Fighting!

1樓 2011-05-17 22:26:43

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

visitor958

至尊木蟲 (文壇精英)

IEEE雜志與會(huì)議專家

應(yīng)助: 2283 (講師)
貴賓: 0.05
金幣: 17310
散金: 2544
紅花: 76
帖子: 15735
在線: 2926.6小時(shí)
蟲號(hào): 489254
注冊: 2008-01-01
專業(yè): IEEE

【答案】應(yīng)助回帖

zhou_jun(金幣+5): 謝謝，很中肯的建議。 2011-05-17 22:52:06

文章介紹 "開發(fā) ... 計(jì)算程序" 的工作，那投物理雜志應(yīng)該不合適吧？除非找學(xué)物理的找些相關(guān)的理由及解釋，否則真的很難。IEEE雜志重視應(yīng)用，但也要有理論，而且要找對(duì)雜志（哪方面的應(yīng)用）。

建議你試著再改一次，不行或不想試了，找個(gè)別的雜志投也可以（不一定是IEEE的，可能要降一檔，的確這樣的文章難發(fā)）。

贊一下