版塊導(dǎo)航: 正在加載中...

登錄注冊

應(yīng)《網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全法》要求，自2017年10月1日起，未進(jìn)行實(shí)名認(rèn)證將不得使用互聯(lián)網(wǎng)跟帖服務(wù)。為保障您的帳號能夠正常使用，請盡快對帳號進(jìn)行手機(jī)號驗(yàn)證，感謝您的理解與支持！

24小時熱門版塊排行榜

返回列表

本帖產(chǎn)生 1 個翻譯EPI ，點(diǎn)擊這里進(jìn)行查看

安娜8885

木蟲 (著名寫手)

應(yīng)助: 0 (幼兒園)
金幣: 3029.6
紅花: 1
帖子: 1345
在線: 211.5小時
蟲號: 708618
注冊: 2009-02-25
性別: MM
專業(yè): 人工晶體

[求助] 請幫助英譯漢，謝謝

A number of scholarly papers and articles discussed later in chapter 2 focused on
academic performance comparisons between charter schools and traditional public
schools. Casey et al. (2002) argued that very little research was devoted to whether the presence of charter schools management created market like environments that enhance systemic improvements in public education. More detailed analysis will be provided in chapter 2. One important element remained similar throughout the research: school management companies were an integrated element in a successful charter school strategy (Bohte, 2004; Becker, Nakagawa & Corwin, 1997; Casey et al., 2002; Finn & Kanstoroom, 2002, Johnson & Landman, 2000). Since administrative performance was repeatedly used to demonstrate the difference between a typical public school administration and charter school management, more time needs to be spent to analyze primary differences between those two models.

回復(fù)此樓

» 猜你喜歡

303求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
一志愿武理085500機(jī)械專業(yè)總分300求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有7人回復(fù)
材料學(xué)求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有5人回復(fù)
考研調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
281求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
0805 316求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有6人回復(fù)
085601求調(diào)劑總分293英一數(shù)二已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)
08工學(xué)調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有17人回復(fù)
340求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有4人回復(fù)
311求調(diào)劑已經(jīng)有3人回復(fù)

奮斗中

1樓 2011-08-23 20:58:18

已閱回復(fù)此樓關(guān)注TA 給TA發(fā)消息送TA紅花 TA的回帖

lflflflflf88

至尊木蟲 (著名寫手)

翻譯EPI: 8
應(yīng)助: 11 (小學(xué)生)
金幣: 12188.6
紅花: 16
帖子: 1909
在線: 386.6小時
蟲號: 1244293
注冊: 2011-03-25
性別: GG
專業(yè): 催化化學(xué)

【答案】應(yīng)助回帖

★
愛與雨下(金幣+1): ~! 2011-08-23 22:11:34
安娜8885(金幣+45, 翻譯EPI+1): 2011-08-24 18:41:45

在接下來的第二章中，有一些學(xué)術(shù)論文著眼于政府特許學(xué)校和傳統(tǒng)公立學(xué)校的學(xué)業(yè)成績的比較。Casey等（2002）認(rèn)為我們很少有研究關(guān)注政府特許學(xué)校管理機(jī)構(gòu)的出現(xiàn)是否創(chuàng)造出了一種能系統(tǒng)提高公眾教育的氛圍。而在第二章中我們將會有更詳盡的分析。在整個研究中，有一點(diǎn)毋庸置疑：學(xué)校管理公司是成功的政府特許學(xué)校管理模式中的一個綜合要素(Bohte, 2004; Becker, Nakagawa & Corwin, 1997; Casey et al., 2002; Finn & Kanstoroom, 2002, Johnson & Landman, 2000)。在以往行政效能經(jīng)常被用作區(qū)分典型的公立學(xué)校和政府特許學(xué)校之間的管理模式之別，（而現(xiàn)在）我們要花費(fèi)更多時間研究以上兩種模式的本質(zhì)區(qū)別。

呵呵,樓主見笑了啊~你再看著改改吧^

贊一下(1人)

回復(fù)此樓

識不足則多慮,威不足則多怒,信不足則多言

2樓2011-08-23 22:04:16